七夕.你们都去陪她了 那我呢
🌚1😱1

Channel
@Latyr77
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,928subscribers
+147 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002608217304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Latyr77 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Latyr77 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 2,928 | -445 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 3,373 | +560 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:02 | 2,813 | +20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 2,793 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 2,792 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 2,800 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 2,794 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 2,782 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 2,781 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 45.8% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
七夕.你们都去陪她了 那我呢
🌚1😱1
开课啦
❤1
七七的小花园🦋 pinned «@Latyr7_bot 双向联系»
宝宝们相信光吗
开课啦
❤1👍1
开课啦
❤2🔥1😁1
不要一直问了
❤2👍1🥰1
开课中
❤3
【逍遥楼报告集】: https://t.me/xiaoyaolun 【所在位置】: #白云 【老师艺名】: #七七 【联系方式】: @Latyr7 【验证留名】:望 【验证时间】:0811 【上课价位】: 1200pp 【紧度如何】:几天没开课,今天是休息回来第一课,特别的紧 【颜值身材】: 人照8.5,白皮,胸有点点小,小乳鸽 ( PS: 从人照几成、皮肤、年龄、胸大小、身高、腿长、下面粉/黑、 屌感、情绪价值、等描述 ) 【服务内容】:xcz做了,还挺配合的 (课表都做了吗/技能熟练度如何) 【服务态度】:不错 , 【优点缺点】:优点人照一致,态度好,嫩妹性格不错,缺点暂无,胸偏小吧,匈奴绕道 【推荐程度】:推荐 ( 不推荐/一般/可冲/推荐/强烈推荐 ) 【体验细节】:好久没出🐔了,今天问一下老朋友七七,原来刚好回来开课了,约了第一课pp,老师在上面按电梯你上去,上到所在楼层老师已经在等我了,带着我去了课室,…
❤3
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】七七 【联系方式】@Latyr7 【所在位置】白云区 【验证留名】钢铁 【验证时间】8.6 【修车费用】600p 【颜值身材】嫩妹 【服务内容】频道有的都有 【服务态度】满分💯 【优点缺点】蛮好 【推荐程度】满分💯 【体验细节】身高身材比例刚刚好很合拍,不胖,开心程度满分💯,皮肤很好白白净净,性格开朗,多次约了,蛮好的一个小姑娘,愿意帮她写报告,还会继续约 ♥️温馨提示: 以上仅代表个人体验,报告仅供参考! 👎🏿府上专员严查假报告!写手代谢出门右转! 报告提交:@Chenyaoyao1_bot
还是哥哥买的衣服好看一点♥️
❤3💯1🥰1
🈳
❤2🌭1👏1🥰1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Latyr77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“七七的小花园🦋” (@Latyr77), 2,928 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Latyr77.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.