Channel
@LattiEhehe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
108subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003903841900 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LattiEhehe |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 4 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LattiEhehe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 108 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 109 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 109 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,032 |
| Reactions total | 628 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,732 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5445157648083199367 | 573 | 33.1% | |
| custom 5341749008987594957 | 567 | 32.7% | |
| 💘 | 355 | 20.5% | |
| 🦄 | 94 | 5.43% | |
| custom 5292038361719001516 | 55 | 3.18% | |
| custom 5291800192897536736 | 38 | 2.19% | |
| custom 5292031700224725007 | 25 | 1.44% | |
| custom 5291891748715382963 | 24 | 1.39% | |
| custom 5246766734949513288 | 1 | 0.058% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,732reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LattiEhehe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⭐Всем привет, мои хорошие! Извините, что пропала 😴⭐ ⭐️В последнее время вообще не было желания рисовать, но я пытаюсь выйти из этого состояния. К чему я это всё. Думаю, в ближайшее время так точно будут арты, ну, как минимум коллаб точно будет🥰⭐️ #Щп (*у мью поактивлю в день выхода арта😘)
custom 534174900898759495732custom 544515764808319936718💘17
🤩🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤩 🇲🇫🖤🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🖤🇲🇫 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ Я не знаю,что можно тут написать🙊 #Полноценки #Hetalia
custom 544515764808319936730💘19custom 534174900898759495717🦄2
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 😃ℬозможно я его и закончу, но очень в этом не уверена. ℬыложу, чтоб канал не пустовал🤩 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ #Скетч #MyHeroAcademia
custom 534174900898759495739custom 544515764808319936724🦄21💘6
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Сегодня у моей подруни день рождения и в честь этого я нарисовала для неё артик. Давайте поздравим её в комментариях, думаю, она будет этому рада❤️ #Реквест #Полноценки 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
custom 534174900898759495744custom 544515764808319936725💘23🦄3
Posted without readable text
custom 544515764808319936740💘23custom 534174900898759495723
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 —ᴇպᴇ ᴏднᴀ ᴋᴏммиωᴇчкᴀ😻 🧣#Коммишка
custom 544515764808319936770custom 534174900898759495735💘23🦄4
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🫥🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🫥 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Вы даже не представляете, насколько же я люблю опоссумов❤️ #Полноценки #Персонажи
custom 534174900898759495740custom 544515764808319936724🦄21💘5
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 "—Жᥙʙᥙ ᥴчᥲᥴᴛ᧘ᥙʙ᧐." 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #Полноценки #MyHeroAcademia
custom 534174900898759495741custom 544515764808319936727💘22🦄3
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 У меня завалялся очень удачный скетчик с этим бро. Доделывать я его не очень хочу, так как сейчас есть над чем работать🐈⬛ Думаю, завтра или послезавтра у меня уже будет готовая полноценка(*тоже по МГА) У мьюшек поактивлю в день выхода арта😎 #Скетч #MyHeroAcademia
custom 544515764808319936735custom 534174900898759495722💘20🦄1
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Я очень люблю свой скин в роблохе, поэтому нарисовала эту бро. Изменено то, что мне не нравится в скине, но, к сожалению, другой одежды нема😸 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩обычно в анкетках я пишу персонажам имя...но не в этот раз, не заслужила🤩 *правда, я нарисую полноценку.Этот реф просто чтоб канал не пустовал #Референс
custom 544515764808319936736custom 534174900898759495727🦄24💘2
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Ещё одна коммишечка🤩 Напоминаю, что коммиши открыты, дап🤩 #Коммишка
custom 544515764808319936740custom 534174900898759495724💘19🦄2
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Первая коммишка готова. 🌼Вторая, спойлер: там два чибика, но она ещё не готова #Коммишка
custom 544515764808319936739💘27custom 534174900898759495723🦄2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LattiEhehe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 915,106 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@LattiEhehe named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⋆. 𐙚 ˚♡Латти♡⋆. 𐙚 ˚” (@LattiEhehe), 108 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LattiEhehe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.