Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 老群批发 🎩

Channel

老群批发 🎩

@Laoqunpifa

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

208subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002244712020
TypeChannel
Usernames@Laoqunpifa @shituan
Created28 May 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Laoqunpifa

Growth

2089 Aug 2026, 17:15 — 208 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 19:47 — 208 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:11 — 208 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:1510 Aug 2026, 03:11
3 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:11208no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:47208no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:15208first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 28 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
342.9%
👎228.6%
👍114.3%
🥰114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2024 to 6 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Mar 2026, 12:32 UTC267 viewsread 9 August 2026

大量TG原始群批发价,1托5到30群,意向咨询 @cuijiu

15 Jul 2025, 09:22 UTC≈2,440 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

原始老群整号出售一拖十左右 账号年份在5至8年区间 群组年份 能保证最低为2023年 群的年份通常在2017~2023年这个范围 🤖崔九 @cuijiu

👎2🥰1

31 May 2025, 08:41 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 9 August 2026

老频道 老频道 老频道 老频道 这是大概报价,具体要求询问客服 2015年 30u 2016年 26u 2017年 22u 2018年 18u 2019年 14u 2020年 12u 2021年 10u 2022年 8u 2023年 7u 2024年 6U

14 Apr 2025, 13:16 UTC≈2,930 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🅾️原始老群: 私密/不可见历史,可截图证明 2014年 35u 2015年 25u 2016年 20u 2017年 15u 2018年 13u 2019年 12u 2020年 11u 2021年 10u 2022年 9u 2023年 8u 2024年 满年 6u

1

2 Mar 2025, 09:10 UTC≈3,300 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

💥购买须知: 都是私密原始群,新人进群无法查看历史记录,可提供截图证明。 购买前请悉知,过后不扯皮。 🤖崔九 @cuijiu

2👍1

Signed 崔八 老群批发

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Laoqunpifa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 288,353 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“老群批发 🎩” (@Laoqunpifa), 208 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Laoqunpifa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.