Channel
@Laissa9
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
102subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002056451751 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Laissa9 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Laissa9 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 102 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 103 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 101 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 101 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
82 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5215584048314866203 | 23 | 28.0% | |
| custom 5363894620574996310 | 16 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5215666236809044356 | 9 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5348244051806151859 | 9 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5343739644724932198 | 8 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5411262187089971776 | 8 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5463206930317081919 | 8 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5325712322658854095 | 1 | 1.22% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
УРА! мне присвоили 3 спортивный разряд💪 остальных, кто получили другие разряды, тоже поздравляю
custom 52156662368090443567custom 54632069303170819194custom 53437396447249321983custom 53638946205749963103custom 54112621870899717761
#затопило😍
custom 53437396447249321983custom 52156662368090443562custom 52155840483148662031custom 53257123226588540951
🎮
custom 53638946205749963107custom 54632069303170819193custom 53437396447249321981custom 53482440518061518591
мы в Сочах
custom 54112621870899717764
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53638946205749963102
ЧиП Республики Марий Эл 2 место 🥈
custom 52155840483148662039custom 53638946205749963104custom 53437396447249321981custom 54632069303170819191
уже завтра выступаем на ЧиП Республики Марий Эл🙏
custom 53482440518061518598
Со дня рождения🐒 спасибо всем кто пришел🙂
custom 521558404831486620313custom 54112621870899717763
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Laissa9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лейс с крабом” (@Laissa9), 102 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Laissa9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.