Lady on Ton is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human
custom 514131829992089327521❤12custom 513873154419772739111custom 51365170289951386856custom 51389764561178469423💅2💋2custom 51366443232358575442

Channel
@LadyonTon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
72subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002168979107 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LadyonTon |
| Created | 14 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LadyonTon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 72 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 73 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 74 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 74 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 14 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
61 reactions across 1 post, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5141318299920893275 | 21 | 34.4% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 19.7% | |
| custom 5138731544197727391 | 11 | 18.0% | |
| custom 5136517028995138685 | 6 | 9.84% | |
| custom 5138976456117846942 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| custom 5136644323235857544 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5138866105523110764 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 3.28% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2024 to 14 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Lady on Ton is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human
custom 514131829992089327521❤12custom 513873154419772739111custom 51365170289951386856custom 51389764561178469423💅2💋2custom 51366443232358575442
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @LadyonTon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lady on Ton” (@LadyonTon), 72 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LadyonTon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.