8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -358. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,499–53,965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 06:26
53,553
-143
12 Aug 2026, 03:03
53,696
-14
11 Aug 2026, 06:02
53,710
-17
10 Aug 2026, 05:12
53,727
-134
9 Aug 2026, 02:31
53,861
-37
7 Aug 2026, 23:07
53,898
-13
6 Aug 2026, 19:00
53,911
no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:49
53,911
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 23 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 53,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,300
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
8 (23 February 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
22,300
Reactions total
1,048
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 27s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,428 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,658
31.5%
👍
1,918
22.8%
🔥
1,560
18.5%
👏
1,228
14.6%
💯
820
9.73%
🎉
242
2.87%
🥰
2
0.024%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,428reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lady_of_Success. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 February 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Когда меня спрашивают: «Как у тебя дома всегда чисто, если ты постоянно в разъездах, работаешь, снимаешь контент и воспитываешь детей?»
Ответ оказался гораздо проще, чем многие думают.
Я перестала пытаться делать всё сама.
Мне нравится окружать себя техникой, которая действительно освобождает время для жизни.
Именно поэтому сейчас у меня дома Dreame Z40 Core Station.
Что особенно понравилось👇
✨ Пылесос сам определ…
Мы отправляемся в наше новое большое приключение — в морской круиз на лайнере Astoria Grande.
Маршрут мечты:
📍Сочи — Амасра — Бозджаада — Кушадасы — Стамбул — Сочи.
И целых 2 дня в открытом море.
Для меня это отдельное удовольствие. Когда вокруг только бескрайняя вода, шум волн, невероятные закаты и ощущение, что время наконец замедляется.
Если честно, морские круизы — это моя настоящая любовь. ❤️
В них есть всё,…
2 года назад мы взяли квартиру в ипотеку в Москве…
на этапе котлована.
Тогда это была просто яма и куча сомнений в голове:
«А вдруг не достроят?»
«А вдруг зря?»
«Может подождать?..»
Но мы не стали ждать.
И знаете, что произошло за эти 2 года?
Квартира выросла в цене в ДВА раза.
Просто потому что мы зашли раньше.
В марте этого года нам выдали ключи —
наша студия 22 квадрата в бизнес-классе стала реальностью.
И в…
Сколько стоит подготовить студию для аренды?
Мы не живём в этой квартире — это инвестиция.
И наша задача была простая: сделать так, чтобы человек заехал и жил с первого дня, без «докуплю потом».
Честно?
Многие говорили: «22 квадрата — это слишком мало»,
«туда ничего не влезет»,
«как там вообще жить?»
А по факту — всё реально, если подойти с умом.
Мы уместили полноценную кухню, всю технику, зоны хранения — и при это…
От мечты до «мы здесь ночуем» - всего 1 месяц. И это, честно, кайф.
Немного выпала из соцсетей, на то были причины!
Месяц назад мы получили ключи от своей квартиры в Москве! Еще недавно у нас были просто 22 пустых квадрата в Москве и куча идей в голове.
И я сразу для себя решила: не буду собирать этот пазл из разных магазинов. Кухня в одном месте, шкафы в другом, диван в третьем — нет, спасибо. Мы живём между Екат…
Сегодня мы прошли очередное ТО на машине
И я снова поймала себя на мысли: мы каждые пол года обслуживаем авто у официального дилера.
Да, переплачиваем.
Да, можно “дешевле у знакомого в гараже”.
Но знаете что?
За 4 года мы НИ РАЗУ ничего не чинили. Вообще.
Сейчас у нас Volkswagen Tiguan R-Line.
До этого был Ford Focus 3 — 10 лет.
И та же история: только плановые ТО, никаких сюрпризов (ну кроме цены)🤭
Когда продав…
Ой, девочки… 💔
Чтобы как-то выжить на такую пенсию - у меня мама получает всего 22 000 рублей - становится по-настоящему тревожно. Это не про «накопить на путешествия», это про «заплатить за лекарства и коммуналку». И каждый раз я думаю: как важно начать думать о деньгах не в 55, а сейчас.
Мы привыкли надеяться на «потом», на государство, на мужа, на удачу. Но реальность такая, что финансовая безопасность - это наш…
Дорогие мужчины!
От всего сердца поздравляю вас с 23 февраля — Днём защитника Отечества!
Этот праздник давно стал символом силы, мужества и надёжности. Он о тех, кто умеет держать слово, брать ответственность, защищать близких и идти вперёд, несмотря ни на что.
Желаю вам крепкого здоровья, внутренней уверенности, стойкости в любых обстоятельствах и мирного неба над головой. Пусть рядом будут люди, ради которых хоч…
❤254💯221👏212👍208
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Lady_of_Success. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 651,160 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Путешествия | ЕДА | Бизнес” (@Lady_of_Success), 53,553 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lady_of_Success.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
