Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 49 days, net -906. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,273–2,451 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 20:37
1,409
-75
19 Sept 2026, 08:39
1,484
-97
14 Sept 2026, 15:17
1,581
-107
11 Sept 2026, 10:40
1,688
-64
6 Sept 2026, 12:58
1,752
-51
2 Sept 2026, 04:55
1,803
-70
29 Aug 2026, 18:38
1,873
-71
26 Aug 2026, 22:25
1,944
-76
24 Aug 2026, 00:54
2,020
-89
20 Aug 2026, 12:53
2,109
-59
17 Aug 2026, 18:26
2,168
-65
15 Aug 2026, 00:28
2,233
-68
11 Aug 2026, 10:13
2,301
-14
10 Aug 2026, 13:46
2,315
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 18 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18
25.7%
custom 5440543904019539329
7
10.0%
custom 5442716556175890551
7
10.0%
custom 6032991160253811631
7
10.0%
custom 5456611123270794325
6
8.57%
custom 5350291836378307462
5
7.14%
custom 5445362698411853149
3
4.29%
custom 5465673538625092766
3
4.29%
custom 5776169798333371886
3
4.29%
custom 5298838871201561605
2
2.86%
custom 5426918614194218658
2
2.86%
custom 5456205858746680452
2
2.86%
custom 5467416419173939737
2
2.86%
custom 5814531990954712167
1
1.43%
🌚
1
1.43%
💔
1
1.43%
Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 4 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5,929
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 10 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1,210
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @L_tork. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 September 2025 to 4 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
تركي…
مش مجرد شخص ده نظام كامل شغال لوحده بيحلّل النظرة قبل ما تتبعت، وبيفهم المقصود قبل ما يتقال.
أي حد يفكّر يناور…
بيبان قدامه وهو لسه بيقنع نفسه إنه ذكي.
وأي حد يقرّب بنية غدر؟
بيتشال من الصورة كأنه ما عداش أصلًا.
#تركي ما بيتكسرش…
لأن الصدمة بتيجي للي عايش على حسن النية.
وهو؟ حاطط كل الاحتمالات في حسابه.
#تركي شايف آخر الطريق
وهو لسه واقف على أوله، وبيسيبك تمشي بمزاجك لحد ما تقع في الغلطة اللي انت اخترتها بنفسك.…
أنا مش مضطر أبرر نفسي لحد،
ولا مستني تفسير من أي حد.
أنا ماشي بطريقتي… على مهلي… وباختياري.
واللي مش عاجبه؟ عادي جدًا.
اتعلمت إن القوة مش صريخ ولا استعراض،
القوة هدوء… ثبات… ونظرة بتكشف اللي مستخبي.
فاهم كويس الدنيا ماشية إزاي،
عارف الصادق من الممثل،
واللي بيحب بجد من اللي بيقرب لمصلحة.
وعارف مين يستاهل دقيقة من وقتي ومين لأ.
مش بدوّر على اهتمام
ولا محتاج وجودي في حياة حد عشان أثبت حاجه.
أنا وجودي تقيل…
ولو دخلت حياة…
مش كل الناس ينفع تطمّن وتسيب… في ناس لازم تحارب علشان تفضل فوق، ولازم تزعل شوية علشان متتسحلش. الحياة فعلًا بتنتهي،
بس الفرق إن في ناس بتعدّي وفي ناس بتسيب أثر. مش كل حاجة بسيطة، وفي حاجات تستاهل تتاخد بجد، مش علشانها مهمة… علشان أنا مهم. مش بدوّر على رضا حد،
ولا مستني سلام مزيف، أنا الضوضاء اللي الناس بتهرب منها، والهدوء اللي مش أي حد يستحقه. راضي عن نفسي؟ أكتر مما تتخيل.
علشان أنا مش عابر في حياة حد، أنا محطة… والل…
في وقت المصلحة
الكل بيقرب… والكل فاكر إنك موجود دايمًا
تدي دعم، تسمع، تشيل عن غيرك تبقى “الجدع” وقت الحاجة وأول ما تقف على رجليك وتبطل تدي تبقى “بارد”.
اللي كان مش فاضي لك
يطلع فجأة لما يشوف إن وجودك مفيد
واللي سابك وإنت مكسور يرجع يقف جنبك لما تقوى مش عشانك… عشان الحساب اتظبط.
ييجوا مغلفين باهتمام
بس العين بتتكلم والكلمة اللي المفروض تطمّن يبان فيها غرض مستخبي
حتى السلام تحسه تقيل والنبرة مش مريحة.
وأنت ساكت مش ضعف
…
custom 54566111232707943251
Signed 𓆩 𝑫ََ 𝙀َِ 𝑴ََ 𝑶ََ 𝑵َِ °ِْ|ِْ° دَايْـمََـ9نَِ 𓆪
بستغرب من نفسي إني عادي أمشي وأقفل صفحة أي حد…
ما بحبش أعيش ناقص ولا أكمّل على حساب نفسي.
أنا متخصص نسيان بشر، نسخة واحدة… لا بتتكرر ولا بتتعوّض.
ولو زعلان مني؟
دي مش مشكلتي، اخبط دماغك في الحيط. 🚬
#TORKY
بطّلت أحاول أفهم البشر، لأنهم ببساطة مش على مستواي.
اللي بيسيب، واللي بيغدر، واللي بيتقل… كله بيحاول يثبت وجوده في لعبه أنا صاحبها.
أنا ماشي على موجي، لا بانتمي ولا بسمع، واللي يحاول يفرض نفسه بيتكسر قدامي بهدوء.
أنا مش ضد الناس، أنا بس فوقهم…
واللي عايز يعرفني، يبدأ من حيث هو بينتهي.
#TORKY
custom 54566111232707943251
Signed 𓆩 𝑫ََ 𝙀َِ 𝑴ََ 𝑶ََ 𝑵َِ °ِْ|ِْ° دَايْـمََـ9نَِ 𓆪
سبت نفسي، مش ضعف… تمرد.
زهقت أعيش بنصّي، وأرضي الكل وأنا بتهري جوّه.
خلاص بطلت أستنى، لا لحاجة تتظبط ولا لحد يفهم.
اللي راح… راح، واللي اتغير فيا مش هيرجع زي ما كان.
بقيت أختار أوجاعي بإيدي، وأوجّهها بدل ما تبلعني.
مش فارقة مين زعل ومين فهم غلط، أنا فهمت نفسي كفاية.
أنا مش الشخص اللي بيتحكموا فيه
بالعواطف ولا بالذنب، أنا اللي بسيب وقت ما أحب، وبكمّل من غير ما أبص ورا.
كان لازم أسيب علشان أعيش، مش علشان أهرب.
الصدق وج…
في كل
مرة الناس تحاول تحددني بكلمة كنت أهرب أكتر مينفعش تلخص إنسان في صفة. أنا نقي وغامض هادي وعنيف طيب وساخر ومتمرد ومتعب أنا كل التناقضات اللي خلتني أعيش بسلام نسبي في حرب داخلية مستمرة
#TORK
Y
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @L_tork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صدى عن شخص يُدعى التركي (مسودتي)” (@L_tork), 1,409 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/L_tork.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
