Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小嵐牌旺財小狗🐶

Channel

小嵐牌旺財小狗🐶

@LZY5222

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

940subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001457115883
TypeChannel
Username@LZY5222
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/LZY5222

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

940949944.56 August 2026 — 946 subscribers7 August 2026 — 946 subscribers13 August 2026 — 943 subscribers20 August 2026 — 946 subscribers26 August 2026 — 949 subscribers2 September 2026 — 947 subscribers11 September 2026 — 942 subscribers29 September 2026 — 941 subscribers9 October 2026 — 940 subscribers6 August 20269 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 64 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 939–950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 16:57940-1
29 Sept 2026, 07:17941-1
11 Sept 2026, 20:56942-5
2 Sept 2026, 12:54947-2
26 Aug 2026, 07:04949+3
20 Aug 2026, 05:08946+3
13 Aug 2026, 15:26943-3
7 Aug 2026, 00:02946no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:52946first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤642.9%
😁535.7%
👍321.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

我常感歎,我究竟是一個怎樣的人 我好像知道答案 又好像不清除答案,我不願承認自己的性格缺陷,甚至習慣把自己包裝成另一個人,我害怕也不想讓別人知道我的真面目,太狼狽了.... 也許是因為太了解自己,每當崩潰的時候 連自己都不敢面對自己的情緒,因為我知道 那是不為人知的一面,那是醜陋扭曲陰暗的一面. 如果這個世界有矛盾體人類的話,那我一定是超厲害的,總在安慰完自己之後又崩潰,我經常安慰自己 洗腦自己 甚至pua自己,我常常感到很痛苦 可是沒有任何原因.

❤1

17 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC390 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

生活是一碗夾生飯 大家默不作聲的吞了又咽

❤1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LZY5222. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小嵐牌旺財小狗🐶” (@LZY5222), 940 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LZY5222.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.