Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 柳州会所95甄选榜

Channel

柳州会所95甄选榜

@LZHS0772

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27,059subscribers

-1,052 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001662641838
TypeChannel
Username@LZHS0772
Description柳州会所资源免费分享
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LZHS0772

Growth

27,05928,11127,58520 Aug 2026, 22:46 — 28,111 subscribers22 Aug 2026, 05:14 — 27,059 subscribers20 Aug 2026, 22:4622 Aug 2026, 05:14
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1,052. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,901–28,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 05:1427,059-1,052
20 Aug 2026, 22:4628,111first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.66%
avg views ÷ 27,059 subscribers
Avg views / post
719
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.181%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held15 (2 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total10,785
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
330
Videos
259
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC294 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#柳州 #柳州会所 #柳州95 #柳州口爆 现在同类场子越来越多,市场又杂又卷。 我们不靠砸广告,只靠口碑和诚信做长久生意。相信来一次,就能给你留下真正舒服、值得回味的体验。 服务主打纯正莞式IOS特色半套,95档位/70分钟。 项目细节拉满:颜射、69、毒龙、锁喉、漫游、乳交、口爆,再加丝足调情、制服诱惑,全程顶级伺候。支持一吹到底,姿势随你发挥,配合度直接拉满。 到店可选类型超丰富: 娇羞可爱的小萝莉、清纯高颜嫩妹、温婉体贴的成熟女秘书、高挑腰细胸挺的性感模特……各路风格女神都有,当面挑到满意为止。 没有所谓“完美技师”,只有最适合你的那一个。 来这里,把男人该有的放松、诱惑和刺激一次享够。 靠谱部长:@LZHS888KB 双向预约:@LZHS888BOT

1

17 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC559 viewsread 22 August 2026

#公告 老群被恶意举报现在已经封禁,没有进新群的赶紧进 {https://t.me/LZ_GCJ} 防止失联

17 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC603 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026

华北地区/东北地区 天津 太原 石家庄 哈尔滨 大连 华中地区: 郑州 南阳 新乡 武汉 武汉2 襄阳 宜昌 长沙 衡阳 常德 华东地区: 济南 临沂 枣庄泰安济宁 聊城 南京 苏州 淮安 南通 盐城 宿迁 扬州泰州镇江 徐州 连云港 无锡 常州 合肥 皖南 阜阳亳州 宿州淮北 蚌埠淮南 上海 杭州 宁波 湖州 嘉兴 绍兴 南昌 赣州 景德镇 福建 华南地区 广州 佛山 东莞 珠海 惠州 江门 中山 韶关 河源 潮州揭阳 南宁 柳州 海口 三亚 琼海 儋州 西南地区/西北地区 西安 兰州 成都 贵阳 遵义 昆明

1

16 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC616 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

#柳州 #柳州会所 #柳州95 #柳州口爆 95颜值线新资源刚到,专等识货的哥哥过来,半套为主,口爆拉满,妹妹贴心、敢玩、不冷场。 一对一私密安排,进门到结束有人盯流程。你想要的节奏、尺度提前说,能满足的尽量给到位——开心尽兴才是目的。 她会用身体带节奏: 发丝扫过你后背,胸口似有若无贴上来,手指却准,按进最酸的位置。脸在线不端着,曲线软、手感实,专业里夹着欲。口活细致,含、舔、深都肯配合,半套做到位,按到你下腹发紧,她还能稳住继续伺候。 靠谱部长:@LZHS888KB 双向预约:@LZHS888BOT

16 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC537 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

#柳州 #柳州会所 #柳州95 #柳州口爆 丝袜大尺度 + 私密预约制,角色感拉满,视觉和肢体都在线。主打可感可玩的真服务,不走假大空: 全裸入场、花式调情、深喉口活、69互动、真空热舞、丝袜挑逗、制服代入——想试的环节提前说,尽量按你的点安排。来柳州想放松、想开一点,这里目标很明确:让你带走爽感,不是走个过场。 ✨ 人貌和状态先过筛,尽量对得起价位 差太多可当场反馈处理;服务缩水立刻说;时间没到不赶人。宁缺毋滥,精品路线,不拿普通货凑数。 ✨ 莞式风格半套95口爆|约70分钟 常见项目:舌吻、69、漫游、口活、丝足、道具、丝袜调情、制服诱惑等。姿势、节奏好商量,以你尽兴为准,私密舒适偏向质感局。 妹子定期换新,到店再选人。 营业位置:柳州 柳南区 靠谱部长:@LZHS888KB 双向预约:@LZHS888BOT

1

16 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC487 viewsread 22 August 2026

华北地区/东北地区 天津 太原 石家庄 哈尔滨 华中地区: 郑州 南阳 新乡 武汉 武汉2 襄阳 宜昌 长沙 衡阳 常德 华东地区: 济南 临沂 枣庄泰安济宁 聊城 南京 苏州 淮安 南通 盐城 宿迁 扬州泰州镇江 徐州 连云港 无锡 常州 合肥 皖南 阜阳亳州 宿州淮北 蚌埠淮南 上海 杭州 宁波 湖州 嘉兴 绍兴 南昌 赣州 景德镇 福建 华南地区 广州 佛山 东莞 珠海 惠州 江门 中山 韶关 河源 潮州揭阳 南宁 柳州 海口 三亚 琼海 儋州 西南地区/西北地区 西安 兰州 成都 贵阳 遵义 昆明

14 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC660 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7509489296

14 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC662 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#柳州会所 #柳州95 #柳州口爆 #柳州SPA 柳州这边365天都在,白天晚上随时能约,不用看日子排班。 妹子选择多,甜妹、御姐、瘦高、丰满都有,喜欢哪种直接说,基本都能匹配上。手法过关,不是走马观花那种,真正能把人按开、让人放松下来。 上班累、应酬多、脑子停不下来的时候,来这里待一两个小时就够了。人会看气氛,知道什么时候轻、什么时候加重,温柔里带点会撩,疲惫感下来得挺快。 想换个方式解压、找个舒服的环境待一阵,直接预约就行。柳州本地方便,过来就能歇着。

11 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,040 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#柳州会所 #柳州95 #柳州口爆 #柳州SPA 学校里那种让人把持不住的女神感,职场上说话都脸红的羞涩实习生气质—— 不如今晚让她们反过来,专心取悦你。 💫 女孩子热情主动,会舌吻、亲胸、揉弄敏感处,奶香与体温贴上来,丝足也敢往你身上缠。 你一句指令,她就软着身子配合,服从又会娇。 💫 年龄段 18–30:甜美少女、青涩嫩妹、清纯学生气、独居少妇都有。 少风尘感,更像“第一次被你打开”的那种劲儿,等你慢慢开发、玩到她也动情。 进门到释放,节奏可以很慢很缠,也可以很会吸很会夹。 私密空间、靠谱安排,射完再软着回血。 营业位置:柳州 柳南区 靠谱部长:@LZHS888KB 双向预约:@LZHS888BOT

2

11 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC913 views0 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#柳州会所 #柳州95 #柳州口爆 #柳州SPA 鸳鸯戏水+泡沫风情+风情按摩+指尖漫游+波涛汹涌+臀臀欲动+蜻蜓点水+过水漫游+舌尖漫游+花式独龙+海底捞月+跪式推油 足分足秒,手法到位,慢热到爆发一次拉满。 引导洗浴 → 推油调情 → 唇舌深喉漫游 → 全身深度释放,射完再回血。 💎 不收定金 💎 靠谱预约 💎 到店消费 全场统一价,无隐形套路 价格:498 出勤:10+ 营业时间:12:00 — 05:00 柳州实体私密店,干净隔音、现场选人,明码实在,老店打点,安心玩到尽兴。

11 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC820 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

#柳州会所 #柳州95 #柳州口爆 #柳州SPA 柳州新式ISO服务 · 诚信金招牌 新柳式ISO标准化服务,把流程、手法、分秒都做到位,在本地同行里先把体验拉满,靠口碑把客留住。 不坑、不骗、不忽悠,诚信就是金字招牌。 特聘资深莞式/AV流向名师驻场培训,严格按标准教学、考核上岗,手法统一又会临场发挥。 足分足秒,该有的环节一点不缩水:引导洗浴、开背推油、耳颈挑逗、唇舌深喉漫游、全身深度放松到释放,节奏清晰,服务拉满。 柳州实体私密空间,环境干净、隔音到位,佳丽精选在房,现场可挑。 明码实在,少套路,打点靠谱,让你从进门到射完放空,都省心、尽兴。

9 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC861 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

#柳州会所 #柳州95 #柳州口爆 #柳州SPA 💎 【高端实体大场 · 私密放松零负担】 💎 找地方放松,安全私密排第一。柳州高端实体会所,独立通道、一客一换,背景靠谱,进来就能彻底卸下防备。 优质技师每日严选,水灵耐看、身材在线,性格放得开、配合度高。从轻声抚慰到贴身热敷,精准拆解白天压力,紧绷瞬间瓦解,只留极度松弛。 释放后整个人彻底放空变轻,睡得超沉。收费透明无套路,环境安静专业。 想要高质量低压力放松,直接联系客服预约,柳州本地快速安排,稳妥到位! 营业位置:柳州 柳南区 靠谱部长:@LZHS888KB 双向预约:@LZHS888BOT

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @LZHS0772. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 538,852 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“柳州会所95甄选榜” (@LZHS0772), 27,059 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LZHS0772.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.