🇷🇺Депутат Ростовской-на-Дону городской Думы
🇷🇺Председатель Совета руководителей Кировского района города Ростова-на-Дону
🇷🇺 Член регионального штаба Народного фронта
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
20,700 average views per post against 14,840 subscribers — an engagement rate of 139.3%. Across the 23,171 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.51% and 23.5%, with a median of 11.7%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
26 of 26 published in the window (2 exact, 24 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
537,398
Mature posts only
150.9% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +1,686. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,625–15,129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:43
14,840
+1,926
11 Aug 2026, 09:47
12,914
-187
10 Aug 2026, 10:27
13,101
+157
9 Aug 2026, 11:01
12,944
-62
8 Aug 2026, 11:52
13,006
-148
7 Aug 2026, 13:46
13,154
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:34
13,154
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
139.3%
avg views ÷ 14,840 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,700
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.519%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
26 (22 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
537,398
Reactions total
2,788
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,030
Videos
≈358
Links
≈758
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
17m 24s
Average length
2m 11s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,788 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
950
34.1%
❤
691
24.8%
🔥
690
24.7%
👏
276
9.90%
💯
112
4.02%
🙏
41
1.47%
custom 5206527199238170614
25
0.897%
😢
2
0.072%
🫡
1
0.036%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,788reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 26 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LVA161. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️
НАЧАЛО
Это и есть нормальная политика большой страны: не искать, за кого вступиться в чужом споре, а понимать собственные интересы.
✅️ Здесь важно одно наблюдение, которое многие часто упускают и о котором мы говорим постоянно. Для российского бюджета спокойный и предсказуемый Персидский залив в долгосрочной перспективе выгоднее, чем хаотичный рост цен на нефть. Резкий взлёт цен даёт краткий всплеск росси…
🇮🇷🇸🇦 Иран и Саудовская Аравия: конфликт, утверждающий многополярный мир.
Что общего у конфликта в Персидском заливе и многополярности? Гораздо больше, чем кажется.
Иран и Саудовская Аравия — это центры силы на Ближнем Востоке и соперники уже почти полвека. Часто их противостояние объясняют так: шиитский Иран против суннитской Саудовской Аравии. Но религия здесь один из факторов. В основе конфликта — борьба за лидер…
⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️
НАЧАЛО
Вообще первый День строителя отмечали с размахом. Открывались новые объекты, проходили собрания и народные гуляния, подводились итоги больших строек. В Москве в это время возводились новые станции метро, жилые кварталы, больницы, объекты энергетики, завершалось строительство знаменитого «Детского мира». Строительная отрасль действительно была одним из локомотивов развития страны.
☝️С тех пор прошло…
🏗 Строитель — пожалуй, одна из самых древних профессий на земле. Причем появилась она значительно раньше самого понятия «профессия». Человек еще не знал письменности, государства, денег, но уже пытался изменить пространство вокруг себя: найти или построить укрытие, защититься от холода, дождя, животных.
Археологи находят стоянки каменного века с остатками жилищ из дерева, камня и даже костей мамонтов. По большому сч…
🇷🇺Неизвестные сражения России: битва при Шепелевичах
Продолжаем рассказывать о легендарных, но совершенно забытых сражениях русской армии. Битва при Шепелевичах 24 августа 1654 года — именно такое. Оно стало одним из ключевых событий русско-польской войны 1654–1667 годов. Именно здесь был сломан хребет армии великого гетмана литовского Януша Радзивилла, а вместе с ним — и надежды Речи Посполитой удержать Смоленск.
…
📱Либо своя цифровая империя, либо колония в чужой
Шесть лет назад COVID-19 перевернул привычный уклад жизни людей. Тогда многим казалось, что удалённая работа, онлайн-сервисы, электронные документы и цифровые платформы — лишь временная мера, вынужденная пауза, после которой всё вернётся к тому «как было». Сегодня очевидно: пандемия стала не причиной цифровой революции, а точкой её невозврата. Именно тогда мир оконча…
⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️
НАЧАЛО
✅️ Первым крупным актом этой стратегии стал взрыв на площади Фонтана в Милане в декабре 1969 года — 17 убитых, десятки раненых. Сразу обвинили анархистов. Один из них, Джузеппе Пинелли, «выпал» из окна полиции.
✅️ Самый крупный теракт в этой серии – взрыв на вокзале в Болонье 2 августа 1980 года: 85 убитых, 200 раненных. Лишь годы спустя следы привели к «Ordine Nuovo» и к спецслужбам. В парламентск…
🇪🇺 Тайная армия Европы: история «Гладио», которую долго скрывали
Европа почти полвека жила рядом с тайной армией, о существовании которой не знали ни граждане, ни значительная часть политического руководства стран будущего Евросоюза. Когда в 1990 году премьер-министр Италии Джулио Андреотти официально признал существование секретной сети «Гладио», выяснилось, что речь идёт не о конспирологическом мифе, а о вполне ре…
⁉️Кто крадет дождь на Ближнем Востоке: теория заговора или секретная технология?
В 2011 году бывший президент Ирана Махмуд Ахмадинежад заявил: «У нас крадут дождь». Тогда над этими словами многие посмеялись. Но сегодня эта история вновь стала предметом обсуждения.
☝️Весной этого года произошло событие, которое многие называют странным совпадением. После сообщений об ударах Ирана по ряду технологических объектов в с…
От души для людей: обновил роллердром в сквере имени Оганова
Лето в Ростове – это не только отдых и тепло. Для многих мальчишек и девчонок — это ещё и время тренировок на открытом воздухе.
❗️Недавно ко мне обратились с просьбой юные спортсмены – скейтбордисты, роллеры и самокатчики. Они профессионально занимаются экстремальными видами спорта, но роллердром в сквере Оганова, где ребята тренируются, вызывал вопросы …
Сегодня, 2 августа, мы отмечаем День воздушно-десантных войск и мало, кто знает, что история этого подразделения началась… на страницах книги.
📚Еще в 1824 году русский писатель Фаддей Булгарин в фантастическом произведении «Правдоподобные небылицы, или Странствование по свету в XXIX веке» описал необычных солдат, которые спускались с неба, быстро освобождались от парашютов, сворачивали их, надевали за спину, словно …
Правовые новеллы августа: пенсии, безопасность, ЖКХ.
С 1 августа вступает в силу сразу несколько важных изменений в российском законодательстве. Большинство из них направлены на то, чтобы сделать государственные услуги удобнее, а меры социальной поддержки — доступнее. Продолжаем знакомить вас с правовыми новеллами.
1️⃣ Работающим пенсионерам автоматически пересчитают страховые пенсии с учетом взносов работодателей …
👍70🔥55❤49🙏4custom 52065271992381706142
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @LVA161. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 810,166 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вячеслав Лобырев 🇷🇺” (@LVA161), 14,840 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LVA161.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.