Software piracy โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 43 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 50โ51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 12:16
50
-1
30 Aug 2026, 23:54
51
+1
10 Aug 2026, 11:46
50
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:56
50
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 November 2021 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
โค๏ธ GAANA PLUS YEARLY โค๏ธ
โญ PRICE:- 100โน/-_
๐ GUARANTEE 1 YEAR
๐ ON YOUR NUMBER
๐ NO ADS
๐ DOWMLOAD UNLIMITED SONGS ๐ง
๐ ACESS TO HD MUSIC ๐ง
๐ MUCH MORE BENEFITS โค๏ธ
๐FREE DINE-OUT YEARLY WITH THIS๐ฅ๐
๐ฅ๐๐ - @LUCIFER_SELLER01
๐ต๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ - @LUCIFERS_SELLING_BOT
๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ก๐๐ - @LUCIFER_SELLS_PROOF
๐ ๐๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฆ - @LUCIFERS_SELL
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LUCIFERS_SELL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2021 to 15 January 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@LUCIFERS_SELL named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
@lucifer_sells_proof named in 12 posts, 11 August 2026 โ 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฎ๐ณ ๐๐จ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ฃ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฆ ๐ฎ๐ณโ (@LUCIFERS_SELL), 50 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LUCIFERS_SELL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
