❌ عضو گیری کلن LAST NiGHT باز شد ❌ 🛡 TAG: LtN丨 👍 شرایط : ⚡️ DIVICE : ⚡️iPAD ⚡️ PC ⚡️ Mobile +90FPS ✔️ سن : +16 قدرت ما در کنار هم بودن است، نه در تنها جنگیدن. ❌ کلن برای اسکواد های رنکینگ و کاستوم پرایز دار نیاز به چند پلیر داره جهت تست به ایدی زیر مراجعه کنید 👍 ❤️🔥ID TEST: @FOR TEST 🛡RESULT : @LtN_RESULT

Channel
LtN丨RESULT
@LTN_Result
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003713144224 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LTN_Result |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LTN_Result |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 12 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 357.1%
- avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 42.9
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 857 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 36
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Top 🥉
🌟𝐢𝐃 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐢𝐍𝐆🌟 🖤𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐍𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬🖤 🥇Magnum 🥈Iner Eternal 🥉LtN Power ᴵᵗ ⁱˢ ʸᵒᵘʳ ʳⁱᵍʰᵗ ᵗᵒ ᵇᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ᵇᵉˢᵗ🖤 🌟𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 : 20:00 🌟𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 : @iD_RANKiNG 🌟𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬 : @Rules_RANKiNGS
Top🥉
🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🖤𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐍𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐓𝐨𝐩 𝐊𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬🖤 🥇AMOLIYA 🥈E1E | MISS ME 🥉LtN MILO ᴵᵗ ⁱˢ ʸᵒᵘʳ ʳⁱᵍʰᵗ ᵗᵒ ᵇᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ᵇᵉˢᵗ🖤 🔛🔛🔛🔛🔛🔛🔛🔛 ⏺𝐎𝐖𝐍𝐄𝐑: @AMIRGOLON ⏺𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥: @Dark_RANKiNG ⏺𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬: @Kingdom_Rules1 ⏺𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍: @KINGDOM_UNION
Top 🥈
🪶PERSIAN GULF RANKIN🪶 ▫️𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖱𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖲𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽 𝖭𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 𝐓𝐎𝐏🥇 R8 old Asgard 𝐓𝐎𝐏🥈 LTN POWER 𝐓𝐎𝐏🥉ADRENALINE ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ ▫️@codm_Mehrshad ▫️@Persian_gulf_ranking
Top 🥇
🪶PERSIAN GULF RANKIN🪶 ▫️𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖱𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖥𝗂𝗋𝗌𝗍 𝖭𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 𝐓𝐎𝐏🥇 LTN POWER 𝐓𝐎𝐏🥈 SW SUPERIOR 𝐓𝐎𝐏🥉ILLUMINATI ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ ▫️@codm_Mehrshad ▫️@Persian_gulf_ranking
Top 🥈
💚 𝑁𝐸𝑋𝑈𝑆 𝑅𝐴𝑁𝐾𝐼𝑁𝐺 💚 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑟𝑑 𝒏𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒖𝒍𝒕 ✨ 🥇 RanGeR 🥈 LtN ON HACK 🥉 Eu RendOG 💢𝐴𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛 : @Nexus_Admin1 💢𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙 : @Nexus_Ranking فایل با کیفیت در کامنت ها ⬇️
TOP 🥇
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LTN_Result. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Persian_Gulf_Ranking · 1,2452 posts𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐃 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆
@COLDRANKING · 6761 post• 𝐃𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐢𝐍𝐆 •
@Dark_RANKiNG · 1,2411 post• 𝐢𝐃 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐢𝐍𝐆 •
@iD_RANKiNG · 1,7621 postNexus Ranking
@Nexus_Ranking · 6961 postSAVAGE RANKING
@SAVAGERANKING · 7001 post-VERiTiY | وراتی
@VER1TIY_TOURNAMENT · 1,1011 post𝗭𝗘𝗨𝗦 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗛𝗜𝗣
@ZeusChampionShip · 1,4271 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LtN丨RESULT” (@LTN_Result), 12 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LTN_Result.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.