Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CL-LST CLAT Institute

Channel

CL-LST CLAT Institute

@LST4LAW

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,405subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001455981564
TypeChannel
Username@LST4LAW
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LST4LAW

Growth

7,4057,4767,440.56 August 2026 — 7,457 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,457 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,476 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,475 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,461 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,441 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,444 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,428 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,418 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,405 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 24 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,394–7,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 04:037,405-13
27 Aug 2026, 09:037,418-10
24 Aug 2026, 05:157,428-16
20 Aug 2026, 17:077,444+3
17 Aug 2026, 16:387,441-20
14 Aug 2026, 09:547,461-14
10 Aug 2026, 21:417,475-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:007,476+19
6 Aug 2026, 14:307,457no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:277,457first reading

Engagement

142 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.00%
avg views ÷ 7,405 subscribers
Avg views / post
222
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.351%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
142
of 142 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 142 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held142 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total31,590
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1794.4%
👍15.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 142 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC103 viewsread 28 August 2026

🚨 LIVE NOW – The Hindu Analysis! 📰🔥 Don’t miss today’s Hindu Analysis — covering all important editorials & exam-relevant topics. 💬 Have doubts? Drop them in the comments — we’ll answer LIVE! https://youtube.com/live/eh1yYZPVnoA

28 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC181 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Hey champs 👋 Here are the must read articles from today's newspaper 🗞 1. Nepal flood toll hits 389; rescue work in top gear (Front) 2. India’s return to its Central Asian neighbourhood (Editorial) 3. Can India build a strategic fuel system? (Text & Context) 4. India, China discuss ways to clarify perceptions on LAC (News) 5. Learn from disaster, halt hydropower projects in State: Sikkim group to PM (News) Fol

27 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC204 viewsread 28 August 2026

🚨 LIVE NOW – The Hindu Analysis! 📰🔥 Don’t miss today’s Hindu Analysis — covering all important editorials & exam-relevant topics. 💬 Have doubts? Drop them in the comments — we’ll answer LIVE! https://youtube.com/live/yH5uMLKDRQw

27 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC232 viewsread 28 August 2026

📖 CLAT 2027 ENGLISH | RC PASSAGE 04 Ready for another RC challenge? 👀 This time: FICTION. Can you understand the passage, identify what matters and eliminate the traps? 🧠 🎯 Practice your Reading Comprehension before the actual exam! 👇 Watch Passage 04 now! https://youtube.com/live/aIrnwFqOinI

27 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC234 viewsread 28 August 2026

👀 Hindu Analysis ke baad logout mat karna… asli CLAT session uske baad hai! ⚖️🔥 “100 days hi bache hain… ab kya possible hai?” — Govind Sir is answering this LIVE today. 😤 🎯 CLAT 2027: Is 100 Days Enough? 📌 Complete strategy + preparation roadmap 💬 AMA — apne doubts directly poochna 🕣 Today | 8:45 PM 🔥 Hindu Analysis → thoda break → Govind Sir ke saath CLAT game plan! 👉 100 days ko countdown mat banao, comeback b

27 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC232 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Hey champs 👋 Here are the must read articles from today's newspaper 🗞 1. Why was Acting CJ of Rajasthan HC not shifted, judge asks CJI (Front) 2. Making India’s food system climate-proof cannot wait (Editorial) 3. Why was Parandur airport scrapped? (Text & Context) 4. India, China agree to advance talks on border delimitation (News) 5. India sends 10 tonnes of essential supplies in first tranche to Nepal (News)

26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC215 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Which historical treaty, signed in 1816 between the British East India Company and the Kingdom of Nepal, established the modern baseline boundary along the Kali River?

  1. A) Treaty of Sagauli56%
  2. B) Treaty of Kathmandu34%
  3. C) Treaty of Sinchula9%
  4. D) Treaty of Betrawati1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC213 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Who signed the landmark 1950 India–Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship on behalf of India?

  1. A) Jawaharlal Nehru35%
  2. B) Chandreshwar Prasad Narain Singh57%
  3. C) Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel8%
  4. D) Girija Prasad Koirala0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @LST4LAW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 65 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz84 voters

Which Article of the 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship guarantees national treatment regarding residence, property ownership, and trade to nationals of both countries on a reciprocal basis?

  1. A) Article 218%
  2. B) Article 520%
  3. C) Article 731%
  4. D) Article 1031%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz83 voters

What is the name of the bilateral annual joint military exercise conducted between the Indian Army and the Nepali Army?

  1. A) Mitra Shakti45%
  2. B) Surya Kiran35%
  3. C) Sampriti13%
  4. D) Yudh Abhyas7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz89 voters

Which historical treaty, signed in 1816 between the British East India Company and the Kingdom of Nepal, established the modern baseline boundary along the Kali River?

  1. A) Treaty of Sagauli56%
  2. B) Treaty of Kathmandu34%
  3. C) Treaty of Sinchula9%
  4. D) Treaty of Betrawati1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz91 voters

Who signed the landmark 1950 India–Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship on behalf of India?

  1. A) Jawaharlal Nehru35%
  2. B) Chandreshwar Prasad Narain Singh57%
  3. C) Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel8%
  4. D) Girija Prasad Koirala0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz88 voters

How many Indian states share an international land border with Nepal?

  1. A) 445%
  2. B) 539%
  3. C) 614%
  4. D) 72%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz82 voters

The territorial dispute at Kalapani–Limpiyadhura–Lipulekh primarily stems from differing interpretations of which geographical feature?

  1. A) The highest ridge line of the Annapurna range6%
  2. B) The origin and main stream of the Kali (Mahakali) River89%
  3. C) The watershed line along the Mechi River4%
  4. D) The border pillars along the Gandak River basin1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LegalEdge CLAT Preparation by Toprankers
@LegalEdge · 46,883
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
Law Prep Tutorial - CLAT Coaching
@lawpreptutorial · 39,972
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
MBA Pathshala
@mba_pathshala · 62,331
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CL-LST CLAT Institute” (@LST4LAW), 7,405 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LST4LAW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.