墨鱼蛋: OO: 94 XX: 8 蛋友e5e40c9ab08b6: 去看《熊出没》的股民怎么说 OO: 27, XX: 0 蛋友16fd3475fbf90: 这种都有人看,以后就只能吃屎了 OO: 23, XX: 0

Channel
煎蛋中文博客网
@LSHH0108
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,922subscribers
-2,828 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003330275095 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LSHH0108 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LSHH0108 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 9,922 | -459 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 10,381 | -153 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 10,534 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 10,540 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 10,543 | -28 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 10,571 | -982 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 11,553 | -561 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 12,114 | -636 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 12,750 | first reading |
Engagement
261 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.023%
- avg views ÷ 9,922 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.3
- 261 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 261
- of 261 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 261 (7 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 604 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8m 37s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
捷克斯洛伐克: OO: 90 XX: 1
Q_Z: OO: 104 XX: 2 兰陵笑笑生: 日本老一辈画漫画和做动漫的都是偏左的 跟现在还是有差别的 OO: 14, XX: 2 饿意的蒸制银鱼: 小男孩和胖子 OO: 8, XX: 0
爱吃榴莲的Neo: OO: 80 XX: 2 木螺丝: 没绷住 OO: 17, XX: 0
Q_Z: OO: 82 XX: 3 筋肉横练小舅舅: 一 (工)一 OO: 22, XX: 1 蛋友24ca83bdd9dc: 你这是卡皮巴拉 OO: 20, XX: 0 旋转跳跃闭着眼: 水獭有耳朵,海獭没有🐶 OO: 12, XX: 0 ShayneTopp: 一周之后: 水獭和海獭哪个是哪个来着 OO: 8, XX: 0
Q_Z: OO: 84 XX: 6 猫南北: 《将不正之风吹向修仙界》里面的男二就是因为自己要联姻一个大自己三千岁的女修士而逃婚了,真实原因是他从小就喜欢那个大自己三千岁的女修士,表示“个子小小,身材好好,身上香香的”,小时候不仅那个女修士抱过他,甚至还给他洗过澡。知道了是联姻觉得自己文不成武不就配不上人家,决定逃婚去好好修炼一番。男主的评价是“女大三,抱金砖,女大三十坐江山,女大三百送金丹,女大三千,位列仙班” OO: 22, XX: 0
looooook: OO: 85 XX: 2 Anon: 这就是那个女人? OO: 48, XX: 0 叫阿姨: 可以拿钥匙了 OO: 28, XX: 0
万寿无疆: OO: 85 XX: 13 jaja: 你们仨把日子过好了才是最重要的 OO: 34, XX: 0 蛋友170019e167c52: 想起共用一个屁股但只有一人是gay的连体男了 OO: 18, XX: 0 白白的小手: 不乱就没事 OO: 16, XX: 0
Canzone: OO: 88 XX: 2 砖头: 起码还有东西,换我就是穿个裤衩 OO: 30, XX: 0
Q_Z: OO: 85 XX: 7 蛋友e61f315cdc3e6: 恩… OO: 63, XX: 0 akm: 所以很多奇幻世界设定里精灵的X欲很低,就是为了避免这种大滥交的情况 OO: 34, XX: 1 了繁: 其实除了人类,大自然里x欲这么强的基本不超过一只手的数量,毕竟野外可是高风险环境 OO: 20, XX: 1 月黑风高: emmm.... OO: 7, XX: 0
Q_Z: OO: 87 XX: 0 蛋友24ca83bdd9dc: “大郎啊……呜呜呜呜” OO: 5, XX: 0
Noone: OO: 88 XX: 8 蛋友e5e61633ee83c: 发行方看完建议别上了,但是导演坚持了,真给他赚钱了( •︠ˍ•︡ ) OO: 36, XX: 0 蛋友e63b64bec06ee: 烂这样的片是怎么排上院线的 OO: 34, XX: 1 旅行者1号: 确实,中国电影博物馆场场满座,这帮黄牛真特么操蛋 OO: 14, XX: 0
Showing the 12 most recent of 261 posts we hold for @LSHH0108. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,205,760 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“煎蛋中文博客网” (@LSHH0108), 9,922 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LSHH0108.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.