Channel
@LRCcf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,063subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002226703868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LRCcf |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LRCcf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 1,063 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 1,068 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 1,069 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (28 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,946 |
| Reactions total | 1,212 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,212 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5465514221108212610 | 721 | 59.5% | |
| 🙏 | 258 | 21.3% | |
| 😡 | 72 | 5.94% | |
| 🤔 | 67 | 5.53% | |
| 👍 | 66 | 5.45% | |
| 👎 | 20 | 1.65% | |
| custom 5210777318485680590 | 8 | 0.66% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Авиайя | Пропавшие • если жизнь начинает казаться излишне серьёзной, она всегда за то, чтобы хорошо провести время. –—♡—– • близкие отношения с ней могут больше рассказать о людях, причастных к вашему делу. –—♡—– • у нее ангельский голос. –—♡—– • она ценит способность оставаться близкими, но не привязанными друг к другу, так что она может достигать своих целей. #анкета | @lrccfbot
custom 546551422110821261038🙏10
всем привет я недавно начала играть и интересоваться фандомом мне очень нравятся грехи, лили, бездушная, код синий и треспия хотелось бы на аккаунт подруг которые ведут жлл покидайте свои ники пожалуйста 😑 неанон мыш #тейк | @lrccfbot
custom 546551422110821261043
УРА! ВЕТКА У МЕНЯ В КАРМАНЕ 🎉🥳 Хочу сказать огромное спасибо участницам данного сообщества за помощь с гайдами, я очень ценю это и очень рада 🥰♥️ #тейк | @lrccfbot
custom 546551422110821261055👍20🙏10
Я серьезно в ахуе с обновы покн, покачала на качелях знатно. Может, это моя проблема, но меня это возмутило.. Мне очень почему-то понравилось финальное испытание, открывающее «доступ» к встрече с названным братом в Аменти (честно, не вчитывалась что да как там называется. Надеюсь, вы поняли, что я имела в виду, была бы рада за подсказку и поправку). И сама встреча была также написана душевно, я считаю. И наконец-то м…
custom 546551422110821261022🙏12👍3
Сара | Любовь со звезд • она лучшая. просто прими это –—♡—– • ее рост ≈183. и это без каблуков –—♡—– • она сложнее, чем кажется –—♡—– • предложит тебе присоединиться к ее борьбе за равенство #анкета | @lrccfbot
custom 546551422110821261066🙏16
Немножко хорни тейк.. Почему в кр так мало орального секса? В основном авторки пихают ножницы (которые вообще надоели) и мастурбацию, а как же куни:( #тейк | @lrccfbot
custom 546551422110821261078🙏28👍7
Посоветуйте жлл эдиторок по кр пожалуйста ❤️ В тг или в тт, но желательно наверное тг #тейк | @lrccfbot
custom 546551422110821261034🙏11👍5
Дамы, прошу вашей помощи Как блин дойти до полиаморной ветки с Хлоей и Лилиан в 7Б? С Хлоей дают очень мало сцен и они почти не поднимают проценты У меня с Лилиан уже 20% а с Хлоей только 7 😭😭😭 #тейк | @lrccfbot
custom 546551422110821261035
Хочу поднять темку щепетильную Меня слегка смущает то, что с фаворитками в «тенях сентфора 2» могут дать интим. Потому что в моей голове не укладывается, как подростки, которые ведут себя, очевидно, как подростки, познающие себя во время влюбленности, будут заниматься сексом. Для меня, по крайней мере, Надин так и выглядит: она не рвется во взрослую жизнь, ее волнует учеба, журналистика и смерть Миранды. Можно вспомн…
🤔52🙏33custom 546551422110821261020👎11👍9😡1
Катерина | Покоряя Версаль • ее игривый характер тебя осчастливит –—♡—– • всегда готова танцевать и любить –—♡—– • энергичная и страстная личность –—♡—– • в ней нет ни капли жестокости #анкета | @lrccfbot
custom 546551422110821261052🙏9
Вы не ахуели? Эта функция была НЕОБХОДИМА для нормальной игры с тех пор как кр решили давать новые наряды и причёски в каждой серии, гардеробом теперь невозможно пользоваться. Они снизошли до смертных и додумались упорядочить гардероб, но только для премиум подписчиков))) #тейк | @lrccfbot
😡66👍13👎3
Сафаа | Пропавшие • верит, что каждая для кого-то создана –—♡—– • обожает делиться с тобой своими увлечениями –—♡—– • готова быть рядом и стать твоей самой главной поддержкой –—♡—– • романтичка, ставит эмоциональную близость выше всего остального #анкета | @lrccfbot
custom 546551422110821261057🙏18👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @LRCcf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,356,637 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lesbian RC Confession” (@LRCcf), 1,063 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LRCcf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.