Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Жизнь нашего зоопарка

Channel

Жизнь нашего зоопарка

@LP_IP_ZOO

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

297subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002276812490
TypeChannel
Username@LP_IP_ZOO
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LP_IP_ZOO

Growth

2962982977 August 2026 — 298 subscribers8 August 2026 — 298 subscribers16 August 2026 — 296 subscribers24 August 2026 — 297 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296–298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 12:28297+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:28296-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:03298no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:33298first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 297 subscribers
Avg views / post
128
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,785
Reactions total143
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

143 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7351.0%
custom 53257993687610274931611.2%
custom 5303367574912779117149.79%
custom 5206601132805212480139.09%
custom 5251416878861006232139.09%
custom 5224205894513873252128.39%
custom 535287166002424677921.40%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC72 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто помнит, мы пристраивали котенка, который решил пожить у нашего дедушки на даче 🐱 Так вот, малыша забрала моя подруга и он живет в новом доме почти месяц. Оказывается, это мальчик и назвали его Тим 🥺

5

6 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC103 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пришел на прием Давненько мы не были в сколково 🌚 Проверили жкт по узи, дальше кровь и сердце проверяем

10custom 52514168788610062322

6 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC112 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Гуманисты собрались на тренировку

custom 530336757491277911710custom 53257993687610274936custom 52066011328052124803custom 52242058945138732521

6 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC111 viewsread 8 August 2026

Чуть-чуть полезностей 😁 давно хотела разобраться в этом

6 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC106 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @handlerproPhoto

🏆 Титулы РКФ и как их быстро закрыть!!! Девочки, еще одна попытка!!! Критикуем, оцениваем. Все ли титулы на месте? @handlerpro

5 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC121 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Гермес решил добить сегодняшний мой день

5 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC130 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утречко 🫡

custom 52242058945138732529custom 52066011328052124804custom 52514168788610062323

4 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC130 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Йодомарин в Останкино любовался дождями и грозой Кукуха 🤌

16

4 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC131 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Этот серьезный взгляд от Герметика, который носится по всей квартире за кошкой 😁

18custom 52066011328052124804

1 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC166 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Утром кошмарили район, сейчас дома уже 😎🫡👍 «Авторская методика: как подружить трех взрослых кобелей. Без стресса, только любовь и понимание» Мог бы звучать этот заголовок. И собирать сотни лайков и записи на курсы или личные занятия 😁 Но я не кинолог и не занимаюсь инфоциганством. Каждый честно получил по шапке моментально за выяснения, кто тут самый красивый мальчик. Память, как выяснилось, живёт дольше любого ж

13custom 53257993687610274938custom 52514168788610062326custom 52066011328052124802

31 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC162 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Королева на отдыхе ❤️

10custom 52242058945138732522custom 52514168788610062322custom 53257993687610274932

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @LP_IP_ZOO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жизнь нашего зоопарка” (@LP_IP_ZOO), 297 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LP_IP_ZOO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.