Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LOST TDM 🇪🇺

Channel

LOST TDM 🇪🇺

@LOST_souls77

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

43subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002270277954
TypeChannel
Username@LOST_souls77
Descriptionmng: @imm_lsd
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/LOST_souls77

Growth

437 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–44 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:4543no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:3443first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Videos
4
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
32s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1433.3%
💯921.4%
🏆819.0%
716.7%
🙉49.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 12 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Mar 2026, 18:34 UTC138 viewsread 10 August 2026

Full LEGEND 🇵🇸 🆚 LOST TDM 🇪🇺 🎮 1 GAME - 11:4 | FROST 🇺🇦 🎮 2 GAME - 18:14 | Full CHEROST 🇩🇪 🎮 3 GAME - 15:14 | FROST🇺🇦 WIN FROST 🇺🇦 total 2:1 🎮 1 GAME -14:11 | ETERNAL🏴‍☠️ 🎮 2 GAME - 20:6 | ETERNAL🏴‍☠️ WIN ETERNAL 🏴‍☠️ total 2:1 🎮 1 GAME - 7:0 | BOSCO🇺🇦 🎮 2 GAME - противник взял тп WIN BOSCO 🇺🇦 total 2:0 🏆 result 3:1 LOST TDM 🇪🇺 WIN

7 Mar 2026, 23:09 UTC366 viewsread 10 August 2026

Full LEGEND 🇵🇸 🩸🩸 LOST TDM 🇪🇺 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗗𝗜𝗢𝗥𝟒𝟒🇹🇷 🩸🩸 ЛСД 🇺🇦 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗧🇩🇪 🩸🩸 FROST 🇺🇦 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗙𝗥𝗔𝗞𝗦𝗜𝗭𝗭𝗘🏴 🩸🩸 BOSCO🇺🇦 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼🇷🇺 🩸🩸 QWANT 🇲🇩 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗧𝗧𝗦𝗩𝗘𝗜🇨🇳 🩸🩸 ETERNAL🏴‍☠️

6 Mar 2026, 14:34 UTC147 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ZEYRONvsCIS

LOST tdm🇪🇺 vs ZEYRON team🇺🇿 ETERNAL🏴‍☠ vs MONTY🇺🇿 VPOTOKE🇺🇦 vs DONK🇺🇿 Qwant🇲🇩 vs SOFT🇺🇿 ALEX 🇰🇿 vs NOEX🇫🇲 LSD🇺🇦 vs PHYSIC🇺🇿

5 Mar 2026, 17:03 UTC152 viewsread 10 August 2026

MAD TDM 🇷🇺vs LOST TDM 🇪🇺 🎮 1 GAME - 9:7 | ETERNAL 🇺🇦 🎮 2 GAME - 18:6 | ETERNAL 🇺🇦 WIN: ETERNAL 🇺🇦 total 2:0 🎮 1 GAME - 13:7 | ALEX 🇰🇿 🎮 2 GAME - 7:8 | HOLIP 🇷🇺 🎮 3 GAME - 11:6 | ALEX 🇰🇿 WIN: ALEX 🇰🇿 total 2:1 🎮 1 GAME - 10:6 | BOSCO 🇺🇦 🎮 2 GAME - 8:1 | BOSCO 🇺🇦 WIN: BOSCO 🇺🇦 total 2:0 🏆 result 3:0 LOST TDM 🇪🇺 WIN

5 Mar 2026, 09:29 UTC84 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @mad_one_atom

5/5 MAD TDM🇷🇺 🔡🔡 LOST TDM🇪🇺 🏳️TOSEN vs ETERNAL🏴‍☠️ 🇷🇺HOLIP vs ALEX🇰🇿 🏴‍☠️DISPOSER vs QWANT🇲🇩 🇺🇦AROMATNIY vs VPOTOKE🇺🇦 🇨🇳KIRA vs XPLAYER🏳️

1 Mar 2026, 12:13 UTC123 viewsread 10 August 2026

UNLUCKY TDM 🇪🇺 🆚 LOST TDM 🇪🇺 BOSCO 🇺🇦 vs ETERNAL 🏴‍☠️ HARVICH 🇺🇦 vs ЛСД 🇺🇦 RUMMI 🇺🇦 vs NO HOPE 🇺🇦 AXILLES 🇰🇿 vs INS7IDE 🇺🇦 S69R 🏴‍☠️ vs VPOTOKE 🇺🇦

4 Feb 2026, 22:23 UTC248 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

WINT TDM🇪🇺 vs LOST TDM🇪🇺 🎮 1 GAME - 9:0 | ETERNAL🇺🇦 🎮 2 GAME - 8:2 | ETERNAL🇺🇦 WIN: ETERNAL🇺🇦 total 2:0 🎮 1 GAME - 13:6 | ALEX🇰🇿 🎮 2 GAME - 12:6 | ALEX🇰🇿 WIN: ALEX🇰🇿 total 2:0 🎮 1 GAME - 11:7 | QWANT🇦🇩 🎮 2 GAME - 15:8 | QWANT🇦🇩 WIN: QWANT🇦🇩 total 2:0 🏆 result 3:0 LOST TDM 🇪🇺 WIN

🔥4🙉4🏆3

2 Feb 2026, 20:50 UTC252 viewsread 10 August 2026

WINT TDM🇪🇺 vs LOST TDM🇪🇺 FASTIK🇷🇺 vs FROST🇺🇦 RETAKE🇹🇷 vs ETERNAL🇺🇦 SIL2NT🇹🇷 vs QWANT🇦🇩 RIZZEN🇺🇦 vs ALEX🇰🇿 FAWLESS🇷🇺 vs VPOTOKE🇺🇦

30 Jan 2026, 17:07 UTC309 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

MAD TDM🇷🇺 vs LOST TDM🇪🇺 🎮 1 GAME - 9:8 | FIRST🇷🇺 🎮 2 GAME - 7:4 | QWANT🇦🇩 🎮 3 GAME - 14:7 | QWANT🇦🇩 WIN: QWANT🇦🇩 total 2:1 🎮 1 GAME - 18:9 | ETERNAL🏴‍☠️ 🎮 2 GAME - 14:6 | ETERNAL🏴‍☠️ WIN: ETERNAL🏴‍☠️ total 2:0 🎮 1 GAME - 11:8 | WINTER🇺🇦 🎮 2 GAME - 10:5 | WINTER🇺🇦 WIN: WINTER🇺🇦 total 2:0 🏆 result 3:2 LOST TDM 🇪🇺 WIN

🏆1

29 Jan 2026, 11:30 UTC292 viewsread 10 August 2026

IND TDM🇪🇺🩸🩸LOST TDM🇪🇺 UNKI🇷🇺 vs ETERNAL🏴‍☠️ SHUMA🇷🇺vs WINTER🇺🇦 KCHAU🇹🇷 vs QWANT🇲🇩 disobedient🇪🇬vs VPOTOKE🇺🇦 XOPNI🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 vs BABIJON🇺🇦

28 Jan 2026, 10:56 UTC286 viewsread 10 August 2026

MAD TDM🇷🇺 vs LOST TDM🇪🇺 SIL2NT🇹🇷 vs ETERNAL🏴‍☠️ DISPOSER🏴‍☠️vs BABIJON🇺🇦 XOLOD🇷🇺 vs VPOTOKE🇺🇦 FIRST🇷🇺 vs QWANT🇦🇩 zzyvren🇺🇦 vs WINTER🇺🇦

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LOST_souls77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 858,958 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LOST TDM 🇪🇺” (@LOST_souls77), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LOST_souls77.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.