Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

暗区SU内核官方通知频道

@LMKKNB

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,524subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003521294814
TypeChannel
Username@LMKKNB
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LMKKNB

Growth

5,5245,5625,5437 August 2026 — 5,562 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,562 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,556 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,542 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,524 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,518–5,568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:545,524-18
11 Aug 2026, 06:555,542-14
8 Aug 2026, 10:545,556-6
7 Aug 2026, 18:015,562no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:585,562first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 5,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
637
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,373
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩4468.8%
🤮812.5%
710.9%
🖕23.13%
🤣23.13%
👍11.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC561 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

谁没效果 滴滴我 @全体成员

💩17🖕2

6 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC689 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💩10🤣2

29 Jul 2026, 00:01 UTC532 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HUXNB888Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ❤️三角洲《KSU漏打变色》纯内部 不泛滥,不和谐,只接受护航开卡! 普通功能 ⭐独家漏打变色梓喵漏哪打哪! ⭐纯算法梓喵版本 ⭐纯算法内部周卡项目 ⭐加入模拟人手的陀螺仪梓喵 ⭐绘制/物资/距离等等功能都有 特色功能 ①漏打变色自瞄(不动任何内存) ②独家雷达预警显示(全方位预警显示) ③KSU面具定制科技(独家隐藏级别) ④超远物资显示(全网首发200米距离) ✨对标市场千元项目 适配新赛季 无视赛季加密 ✨工作室专用 护航专用 内部项目😀 👑提卡后发送内部群 作者1对1售后问题 🔸支持骁龙/天机处理器 5.1-6.6和6.12内核版本 ‼️ 🔸不支持4系 ‼️ 😄陀螺仪自瞄+顶级绘制+完美物资 😃距离显示 射线 下发提示 😄头甲 基础绘制 盒子显示 🔝特点①首发纯算法写法,和谐只会遁地,不会出现封号问题!! 🔝特点②绝对真实的纯算法,梓喵也不会动任何内存!! 🔝特点③控人数防泛滥,禁止宣传

🤮84

26 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC463 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HUXNB888Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ❤️三角洲《KSU漏打变色》纯内部 不泛滥,不和谐,只接受护航开卡! 普通功能 ⭐独家漏打变色梓喵漏哪打哪! ⭐纯算法梓喵版本 ⭐纯算法内部周卡项目 ⭐加入模拟人手的陀螺仪梓喵 ⭐绘制/物资/距离等等功能都有 特色功能 ①漏打变色自瞄(不动任何内存) ②独家雷达预警显示(全方位预警显示) ③KSU面具定制科技(独家隐藏级别) ④超远物资显示(全网首发200米距离) ✨对标市场千元项目 适配新赛季 无视赛季加密 ✨工作室专用 护航专用 内部项目😀 👑提卡后发送内部群 作者1对1售后问题 🔸支持骁龙/天机处理器 5.1-6.6和6.12内核版本 ‼️ 🔸不支持4系 ‼️ 😄陀螺仪自瞄+顶级绘制+完美物资 😃距离显示 射线 下发提示 😄头甲 基础绘制 盒子显示 🔝特点①首发纯算法写法,和谐只会遁地,不会出现封号问题!! 🔝特点②绝对真实的纯算法,梓喵也不会动任何内存!! 🔝特点③控人数防泛滥,禁止宣传

1

25 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC651 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HUXNB888

目前三角洲内部推荐 《789漏打变色》没问题!可开卡冲,无任何问题!! 《KSU漏打变色》没问题!可开卡冲,无任何问题!! 《X5梓喵内部》没问题!可开卡冲,无任何问题!! 全部无任何问题!!稳定性拉满!! 开卡代理①: @YGSJZ666 开卡代理②: @XYNBDD 双向机器人 @xiyang666bot 唯一官方频道:@KKNB9 全网首发解决协议问题!! 外面协议是因为解密动内存了!! 789/ksu/X5无任何协议问题!!!

1

22 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC827 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ❤️三角洲《KSU漏打变色》纯内部 不泛滥,不和谐,只接受护航开卡 开卡负责人①: @XYNBDD 双向机器人 @xiyang666bot 官方唯一频道 @HUXNB888

1👍1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @LMKKNB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“暗区SU内核官方通知频道” (@LMKKNB), 5,524 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LMKKNB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.