Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Lukasss93's Dev Channel

@LKS93C

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,376subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001153707529
TypeChannel
Username@LKS93C
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LKS93C

Growth

3,3753,3803,377.56 August 2026 — 3,375 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,375 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,380 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,376 subscribers3,3766 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,374–3,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:263,376-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:063,380+5
6 Aug 2026, 22:203,375no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:013,375first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

933 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14916.0%
👍13314.3%
🖕12513.4%
🤮11212.0%
🤡10210.9%
👎859.11%
💩828.79%
🔥313.32%
custom 5465178805637226937283.00%
🍾151.61%
👏121.29%
😁90.965%
😢90.965%
🥰70.75%
🎉60.643%
40.429%
❤‍🔥40.429%
👌40.429%
😱40.429%
💘30.322%
4 further kinds90.965%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 933reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2023 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2025, 20:08 UTC≈8,520 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Telegram hasn’t fixed it yet, but I managed to get the ❤️ @newstickeroptimizerbot working in another way. Enjoy 😎

7🔥4👍1👏1

12 Sept 2025, 18:23 UTC≈8,380 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hi! Some bots may not work properly due to a temporary issue with the Telegram APIs, which doesn’t depend on me. Please wait a bit, I’ll let you know once it’s resolved.

👍114👏1🔥1

31 Dec 2024, 23:11 UTC≈15,900 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

19🖕18🍾8👏4💘3🥰1

23 Dec 2024, 23:29 UTC≈67,000 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❤️ @stickerizerbot NEWS ❇️ Update v2.6 Changelog 🎉 Added direct link to mini app ⭐️ Reactivated the /donate command Thanks for using ❤️ Stickerizer! Enjoy the latest features and improvements in version 2.6 🚀

11👍6🖕5👏3🤮2

17 Jul 2024, 19:38 UTC≈21,900 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❤️ @newstickeroptimizerbot NEWS ❇️ Update v2.5 Changelog 🎬 Added the ability to optimize video files ⭐️ Reactivated the /donate command

👍296🖕4👏2

2 Jul 2024, 14:00 UTC≈20,300 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hey, it's not spam, it's self-promotion! 😄 It's a new project joining the ecosystem! Thank you! ❤️

13👍32

2 Jul 2024, 14:00 UTC≈18,200 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @OurTeleHub

🌟 Introducing TeleHub! 🌟 We are excited to announce the beta launch of TeleHub, your new go-to platform for discovering and sharing Telegram bots, channels, and groups! 🚀 🔍 Explore Find the best bots, channels, and groups tailored to your interests. 📢 Promote Submit your own bots, channels, and groups to reach a wider audience. 💬 Community Connect with other Telegram enthusiasts and grow your network. Coming Soon

7👍42🆒2

30 Jun 2024, 19:48 UTC≈11,300 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❤️ @newstickeroptimizerbot NEWS ❇️ Update v2.4 Changelog ✂️ Added the ability to trim transparent areas

9🔥5👍1

6 Jun 2024, 16:59 UTC≈12,800 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The /donate command has been removed from all my bots. Thanks for your support all these years ❤️

13😢9😱4

8 Mar 2024, 22:58 UTC≈18,300 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hi there. I have noticed that several social accounts, channels, groups and scam sites have been opened regarding my bot ❤️ @newfileconverterbot. I would like to remind you to stay away from them and report them as soon as possible. This ❤️ @LKS93C is the only official Telegram channel. PS: Stay tuned for upcoming updates that will include an official site, new stats and other big news.

👍288❤‍🔥4👌4🤯3🖕2

2 Feb 2024, 20:19 UTC≈60,300 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❤️ @stickerizerbot NEWS ❇️ Update v2.5 Changelog 🎉 Added /store command 📊 Added "Usages per sticker" statistic Thanks for using ❤️ Stickerizer! Enjoy the latest features and improvements in version 2.5 🚀

👍13🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LKS93C. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lukasss93's Dev Channel” (@LKS93C), 3,376 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LKS93C.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.