Channel
@LHCAB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
41,504subscribers
-211 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003228080667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LHCAB |
| Description | 交流群： @alhcqun 澳门频道： @LHCAB 老澳频道： @amlh1 香港频道： @xglhcb 有问题请联系群主： @acong6 广告投放 / 商务合作： @acong6 每日更新资料图、高手料、精选视频、开奖信息、内幕参考等内容。 想找资料、看视频、查开奖、追更新，一个群帮你整理好。 资料齐全｜更新及时｜长期稳定｜永久免费 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LHCAB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 41,504 | -38 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 41,542 | -36 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 41,578 | -59 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 41,637 | -46 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 41,683 | -32 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 41,715 | first reading |
120 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 120 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 120 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,461 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥慕熙团队携手B.CC再战六合彩 🔥慕熙团队2026重磅项目 发财链接：https://b.cc/register?code=LHCMX 发财链接：http://6888b.cc/register?code=LHCMX 😀😀😀😀深耕会员资料整合多年，专业沉淀只为省心而来！ 新澳门六合彩😄😁😁😁😁😄😁，收集各大精准且稳定料子经过验证然后发布在会员群里，资料记录都是真实记录不改料，每天稳定更新，比你自己在满飞机，去网站瞎鸡巴乱看的好，实话实说，资料都是我们精挑细选的，😁😁的齐全大家也能看见，海量😁😁任君挑选，不光有常规资料，还有版主个人心水 进会员群的老总 联系以下管理 🥰🥰🥰@laotie888 老铁 🥰🥰🥰@mm9363 毛毛 🥰🥰🥰@agua831013 喜儿 TG六合圈最具权威性团队 慕熙团队 资源导航 关注本频道，即可订阅本团队所有资料频道 😀https://t.me/liuhecaiai 一直被模仿，从未被
Photo, posted without a caption
阿聪推荐
圣斗士一肖
思钱想厚
致富一肖
———😍✨慕熙团队管理组温馨提示 👍😍———
阿祖六肖
神
搬砖四肖
熊猫七肖
鸿运六肖
Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @LHCAB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 824,685 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新澳门｜资料分享库” (@LHCAB), 41,504 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LHCAB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.