Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 晶晶测评反馈

Channel

晶晶测评反馈

@LDJjingjing01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003906923475
TypeChannel
Username@LDJjingjing01
Created1 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LDJjingjing01

Growth

232.58 August 2026 — 2 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:163+1
14 Aug 2026, 02:322no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:342first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1794.1%
avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
Avg views / post
53.8
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total915
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC2 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @LudingjiCP

【妹子花名】:晶晶 【所属店铺】:鹿鼎记 https://t.me/LudingjiChat 【验证留名】:Hhuuu 【验证时间】:2026-8-13 【大概位置】:中天西纪 【服务内容】: ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 摸胸 ✅ ③ 吃胸 ✅ ④情绪价值 ✅ 配合度:10分 【颜值打分】:7分 【身材打分】:7分 【吻技打分】:6分 【敏感度分】:9分 【推荐程度】:8分 【综合评价】:8分 【牌局体验】: 好大哥推荐的,驱车1小时,约的23点,已经末班车了,进门观察,妹妹一身亚文化打扮,整体还是比较符合我的审美的,客服递了瓶水,和妹妹一起进房间…房间不大,不透光,除了投影仪的光,很暗,整体布局,中规中矩吧,就一张床也没啥了,妹妹先去上了厕所,然后回来,开个投影,一起躺床上,不是主动型,短暂沟通破冰后,顺势亲亲,舌吻不熟练,中蟒蛇吧,摸摸胸,不算小,应该是c,很嫩很挺,卸甲很顺利,下面也很敏感,

12 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC3 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @LudingjiCP

#牌局复盘 【麻友】:乌萨奇大哥哥 【棋牌室】:#鹿鼎记 【麻将搭子】:#晶晶 【搭子链接】:https://t.me/aiyedejingdi/192373 【台费】:600 【胡牌牌型】:#大班 【牌局特点】:#中大蟒蛇 【各项得分】:(0-10,6 为及格) 环境:6 人照:7 身材:7 皮肤:7 态度:10 敏感度:9 抽烟:无 纹身:无 各种钉:无 【综合得分】:8 【牌局体验】: 好哥哥推荐,观察已久,正好今日得空随即出发,停车方便出入方便,就是房间略显老旧,并且略有些许霉味,杭州这个天气也是无奈。 进门后晶晶占用洗手间化妆,稍等了片刻,一支烟没抽完,便拉着我进房了,等我用过漱口水后,便关上了灯,躺下后,晶晶便开始跟遥控器搏斗,看得出来配合的不是很好,几分钟后总算是调试完毕。钻进了我怀里,破冰一分钟直接就亲上了,青春的肉体突出一个嫩字,卸甲非常顺利,全身上下都是敏感点,小C胸很挺

11 Aug 2026, 02:57 UTC37 viewsread 14 August 2026

#牌局复盘 【麻友】:现在 现在(戒了) 【棋牌室】:#鹿鼎记 【麻将搭子】:#晶晶 【搭子链接】:https://t.me/LudingjiChat/6406 【台费】:600 【胡牌牌型】:#大班 【牌局特点】:#中蟒蛇 #素人感 【各项得分】:8 环境:7 人照:8 身材:8.6 皮肤:8.8 态度:9 敏感度:8 抽烟:无 纹身:无 各种钉:无 【综合得分】:8.5 【牌局体验】:憋了一天,忍不住想要找个地方释放。找来找去还是选择去了鹿鼎记。每次去鹿鼎记都是充满期待的心情。第一眼看到晶晶,感觉就是懵懂无知的少女一样。充满青春气息。很白嫩,真的是白!嫩!胸又大又挺。身材确实不错。刚开始感觉长得一般。后面房间细看,又感觉还是不错的。身材也是很顶。我的观点是,人白,怎么样都好看。怎么样都上头。上来聊几句便一卸到底😏*.。(๑・∀・๑)*.。稍微摸了下,就开始小水潺潺。便开始了标志性动作,云

10 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC28 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#鹿鼎记 #晶晶 店铺:https://t.me/LudingjiChat 出击人:吹雪 @chuixuejiang 类型:#巨乳 #萌妹 出击时间:2026.08 环境:标准大床房,有一次性床单,投影正常 人照相似度:8.5(脸很像) 本人颜值:6.7 身材:身高158 体重110,胸围C 抽烟:无 纹身:无 唇钉舌钉:无 吻技:大蟒蛇 班型:超大 妹妹优点:听话懂事配合度高,巨乳大屁股,能接受轻微m,声音好听。 妹妹缺点:标准圆脸小胖妹,下体有味(湿巾擦之后无味),反馈单一(只会轻哼),主动性欠佳。 (优缺点以吹雪个人审美为标准,有些在我这里是缺点可能在其他玩家眼里是优点,请勿纠结) 妹妹服务(尺度):超大+,十分卸甲,可蹭 吹雪评价:带任务出击的,小怡在上钟,选了晶晶,见面第一感觉是个标准的学生时代小胖妹,穿的是带裙撑的女仆装还挺可爱的,进房间和妹妹坐在床上待了一会,妹妹有主动找我说话,可能因为年龄问题,话题还是

8 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC56 viewsread 14 August 2026

#目录 #模板 模板A 返回频道导航 #No 店铺:#鹿鼎记 女仆:#晶晶 类型:#邻家妹妹(例,可以写御姐,bbw,萝莉,S/M等,可以有复合类型,比如萝莉M等) 出击人:#泽熙 出击时间:2026.08 环境: A,小区房 人照相似度:人照8 罩杯:胸C 身材:屁股大胸大 身高:160 体重:100 皮肤:较白较滑 态度:A,配合度较高 聊天交流:拘谨 敏感处: 胸,豆豆敏感 抽烟:无 纹身:无 唇钉舌钉:无 吻技:吻技一般 过程:人照8分,可爱的小妹妹,有肉感,微胖,说话小声比较腼腆,破冰后非常配合,因为衣服多,卸全甲花了好几分钟,之后舌了一会往下一模湿透了,那我必须要用上加藤鹰之手了,很紧很滑,不愧是年轻的身体,之后就开始隔裤蹭起来,湿湿的很舒服,蹭了一段时间后在妹妹的小手的帮助下,边吃奶边发射了,很乖的妹妹,弟兄们下手轻点 以下为六维评分,分项目评分(严格按照评分标准打分,不要带有太多感情色彩,不要遗漏六维评

6 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC65 viewsread 14 August 2026

#空港基地 @837号飞行员 #晶晶 #鹿鼎记 #拱墅 #2026.8#1h 店铺:https://t.me/LudingjiPB/107 颜值7.5 身材7.5 皮肤8 敏感度9 性格9 综合体验8.5 优点:很棒的素人感,敏感度、配合度均在线 缺点:略微有些小肉肉 过程: 1.一进房间,就让妹妹幼态的气质、无辜的眼神吓了一跳,还正津津有味的看着熊大熊二。。不会是wcn吧,顿时有点方。。邻家小萝莉的既视感,牙齿矫正下会更加甜美,微微有些肉肉,时常会憨憨的笑,有点可爱。。 2.妹妹可能是在偏压抑的环境中长大,认知上对外部世界并没有怯魅,缺乏一些底气和自信,于是呈现出一种生命力十足却小心翼翼的状态,不禁会让人有些心疼。。 3.破冰拉扯了下聊了会天,妹妹慢慢开始放松下来,甚至放声大笑开始放飞。。这节奏不对啊,于是郑重其事的告诉妹妹,爸爸不是搞笑来的,是ghs来的,我们赶紧开始吧。。 4.中蟒蛇起手,闭上眼很投入,皮肤丝滑而有

4 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC61 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @whointheworldamiPhoto

#No1659 店铺:#鹿鼎记 女仆:#晶晶 💯评分标准 店铺链接: t.me/LudingjiPB 类型:#邻家妹妹 价格:600/h 出击人:#danzhi 出击时间:2026.7 环境: A,小区房 人照相似度:人照8 罩杯:C 身材:胸大屁股大 身高:160 体重:95 皮肤:皮肤较滑 态度:A,配合度较高 聊天交流:不拘谨 敏感处: 三点敏感 抽烟:无 纹身:无 唇钉舌钉:无 吻技:中蟒蛇 🌱初见 进门第一感觉,就是还没长开的小妹妹,稍微肉感,眼睛布灵布灵的,挺可爱的。 🔥过程 真人跟模卡数据没差,是个带着点微肉感的青春小嫩妹,绝不是坦克!妹子特别懂事又有讨好感,一进屋就主动牵手、热情反向破冰。最离谱的是她体质巨敏感,还没怎么预热呢下面就直接泛滥了,指尖试探又紧又湿,水声听得人火气大涨。不管是隔裤互动还是骑马配合都相当有一套,拉扯感直接拉满。结束之后抱着聊天也特别接地气,古灵精怪的完全不冷场。一句

3 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC72 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @kgjdddd

#空港基地 @0528号飞行员 #晶晶 #鹿鼎记 #拱墅 #2026.8 #1h 店铺:https://t.me/LudingjiPB/107 颜值7.5 身材7.5 皮肤8 敏感度8.5 性格9 综合体验8.5 优点:乖巧,配合,敏感 缺点:微胖 过程: 初见妹妹第一印象是刚出校园的学生妹,浑身充满着青春活力,但是穿着打扮过于成熟,显得有点土土的。妹妹的底子很不错,圆脸带点婴儿肥,实际上是巴掌脸,皮肤又白又嫩,气色非常好,整体干干净净的。颜值主观T3,属于普通人中的潜力股。 有篇测评写到妹妹是讨好型人格,很有同感。因为妹妹的衣服不好下手,因此破冰后就让妹妹卸甲到一丝不挂。看着妹妹眼神躲闪,似乎还挺害羞的,亲上去后却是异常配合。盈盈一握的酥胸,稍微抓了下,妹妹似乎不太吃痛,嘤咛了一声,乳头也一样敏感,舔了几下就跟蚂蚁在身上爬一样。接下来也是开始了语言调教,手口并用,享受着妹妹又羞又气又痛又爱的那种拉扯和配合,实在好玩。差不

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LDJjingjing01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 306,507 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“晶晶测评反馈” (@LDJjingjing01), 3 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LDJjingjing01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.