Interesting email chain from the Epstein files on the DOJ website... https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00173266.pdf You can find this yourself by going to the Epstein Library on the DOJ website here... https://www.justice.gov/epstein/search Scroll down & type Nesara in the Search box under where it says 'Search Full Epstein Library' (See 1st picture) & click the Search button... * Don't use t…

Channel
LA Merc Channel
@LA_Merc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002245540716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LA_Merc |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LA_Merc |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 50 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 49 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 50 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 50 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.86%
- avg views ÷ 50 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.4
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
⬆️⬆️⬆️
⬆️⬆️⬆️ The text in the above picture came from the AI brainstorming session I did in my last post regarding my financial predictions & the revaluation of currencies... But that last sentence... "The transition cannot happen overnight without triggering a catastrophic, unmanageable global collapse." Applies to EVERYTHING THAT IS HAPPENING WORLDWIDE... not just financial changes... Including... The full release, …
⬇️⬇️⬇️
⬆️⬆️⬆️ Pay attention for these triggers for confirmation that my theory is accurate & on track...
Photo, posted without a caption
LA Merc Channel pinned «My prediction regarding currencies... using AI to help. I'm not a financial planner, blah blah blah... in other words, I'm not responsible for your decisions. Use your own discernment. But I would love to hear from any currency traders... who agree or disagree.…»
My prediction regarding currencies... using AI to help. I'm not a financial planner, blah blah blah... in other words, I'm not responsible for your decisions. Use your own discernment. But I would love to hear from any currency traders... who agree or disagree. I think I have a better chance of being right at this time than them... just because I feel pretty confident in my geopolitical analysis of what is current…
https://x.com/i/status/2085857686357164270
Part 9... https://x.com/i/status/2086167267788918982
Part 8... https://x.com/i/status/2085800104942870928
Nobody talks about this, but the BAR, (British Accredited Registry) needs to go. We can't restore our Constitutional Republic with a completely captured Judicial Branch... https://x.com/i/status/2085804707788812797 I have no idea how this will be done, but it must happen.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @LA_Merc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LA Merc Channel” (@LA_Merc), 50 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LA_Merc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.