Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lambo Algo

Channel

Lambo Algo

@LAMBOALGO

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,890subscribers

+72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001347387720
TypeChannel
Username@LAMBOALGO
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/LAMBOALGO

Growth

1,7991,8901,844.57 August 2026 — 1,818 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,818 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,817 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,814 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,808 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,802 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,803 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,799 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,804 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,890 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 34 days, net +72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,785–1,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 02:171,890+86
4 Sept 2026, 23:371,804+5
29 Aug 2026, 10:461,799-4
26 Aug 2026, 17:551,803+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:591,802-6
13 Aug 2026, 15:371,808-6
10 Aug 2026, 17:511,814-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:151,817-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:161,818no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:041,818first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍457.1%
114.3%
🎉114.3%
🔥114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Mar 2026, 17:59 UTC571 viewsread 7 August 2026

$Orel 27k mc gamble DPKxq2NT72eBDJQXiufjsjFZVWUNFrzt6rGZyWfnpump

4 Mar 2026, 02:46 UTC794 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gamble this $12k mc. Dev previous did good, not sure how this will. $CHUNK HezRRBi9ntnJ9kXesqZBEK3j1T49YXxpmyMWzWjapump

1

6 Feb 2026, 08:42 UTC935 viewsread 7 August 2026

viral video and ctoed by good dev, he did million projects last few months

6 Feb 2026, 08:41 UTC821 viewsread 7 August 2026

Gamble $🟦 $40k mc kFV4pcj4MCq6egFBLQBERZjDTVqBprsDYNL3QCipump

5 Feb 2026, 08:46 UTC728 viewsread 7 August 2026

sbd just make a x com: https://x.com/i/communities/2019323032163016790

5 Feb 2026, 08:22 UTC547 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Currently running 2 main X coins, but I also picked up a small bag of the original $X (deployed ~230 days ago, right when X officially ended). Solid R/R if this pumps, thinking buy-and-hold for a while. $X $20k market cap CCRVGSEqWLT5UpGNcCtN5DtoBDErpwKarJCkrywRbQKB

4 Feb 2026, 05:25 UTC353 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Good morning bros! Just got back from holiday (totally forgot to post lol) - let’s go hunt the next 100x

👍2

30 Jan 2026, 20:34 UTC409 viewsread 7 August 2026

he joined 2 hours ago, was busy and didnt check this, but still good i think

30 Jan 2026, 20:28 UTC339 viewsread 7 August 2026

Aped this $50k mc 5eFQMe51UYtz4DiCzzQeAaffw6tNZyyALRMgPwx7BAGS

30 Jan 2026, 19:33 UTC319 viewsread 7 August 2026

Degener will hunt for narrative, and this one $STRUGGLE will alway there, is the first ever meme in AI-Social platform.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LAMBOALGO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Silencio Official Announcements
@silencioAnnouncements · 56,023
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lambo Algo” (@LAMBOALGO), 1,890 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LAMBOALGO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.