Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net -3,378. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,460–48,852 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 13:57
44,967
-53
7 Nov 2026, 06:40
45,020
-151
6 Nov 2026, 03:26
45,171
-119
4 Nov 2026, 23:54
45,290
-34
3 Nov 2026, 21:16
45,324
-59
2 Nov 2026, 21:06
45,383
+354
1 Nov 2026, 21:17
45,029
-44
31 Oct 2026, 17:40
45,073
-109
30 Oct 2026, 14:16
45,182
-129
29 Oct 2026, 10:49
45,311
-106
28 Oct 2026, 06:06
45,417
-44
27 Oct 2026, 09:01
45,461
-35
26 Oct 2026, 06:41
45,496
-71
25 Oct 2026, 05:47
45,567
-60
24 Oct 2026, 07:15
45,627
-117
23 Oct 2026, 06:17
45,744
+305
22 Oct 2026, 05:38
45,439
-89
21 Oct 2026, 01:27
45,528
-78
20 Oct 2026, 03:06
45,606
-33
19 Oct 2026, 05:40
45,639
first reading
Engagement
738 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.10%
avg views ÷ 44,967 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,740
236 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.404%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
236
of 738 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 210 of 236 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
738 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
647,664
Reactions total
2,494
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,490
Videos
≈775
Links
≈187
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 31m
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 203 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,267 reactions across 629 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,247
75.6%
👍
1,283
15.5%
😢
269
3.25%
🥰
153
1.85%
🕊
93
1.12%
🍓
58
0.702%
💯
56
0.677%
❤🔥
39
0.472%
😍
36
0.435%
⚡
10
0.121%
🤗
10
0.121%
🌚
4
0.048%
🙈
4
0.048%
💔
3
0.036%
👀
1
0.012%
🤩
1
0.012%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 642 of the 738 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 738 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 236 posts held from the last 30 days (1.27%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Stilniy kiyinadigan asal qizlarimiz uchun KUZGI va QISHGI asalka looklar onlayin magazinlari topildi 🫠❤️ Siz xohlagan brend liboslar endi arzon narxlarda 😻❤️🔥
🛍 Nejniy vecherniy ko'ylaklar ~ 99 ming
🛍 Asalcha maktab formalar ~ 89 ming
🛍 Kuzgi asal para dvoykalar ~ 79 ming
🛍 Eng so'nggi stilniy looklar ~ 69 ming
🛍 Brendiviy kasmetikalar ~ 59 ming
🛍 Trendiviy oyoq kiyimlar ~ 49 ming
Olmosdek yarqiragan nafis va bejiri…
18. Одамлар сени ёқтираётган бўлса, билгинки, улар Аллоҳ сенда зоҳир қилиб қўйган нарсаларни ёқтиришяпти, холос. Улар ҳали Аллоҳ сатр қилиб қўйган (бировлардан яширган) қабиҳликларингни билишмайди. Шундай экан, мағрур бўла кўрмаки, бу Аллоҳнинг гўзал сатридир. Аллоҳдан дунёю охиратда ушбу сатр ва офиятни сен учун бардавом қилишини сўра.
Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам шундай дуо қилардилар:
اللَّهُمَّ اسْتُرْ ع…
6577. Солиҳлардан бири: "Аллоҳим, ризқимда барака бер", деб дуо қилар эди. Шунда бир киши: "Нима учун Аллоҳим, менга ризқ бер", деб айтмайсиз?” деди.
У зот: "Аллоҳ таоло барча тирик жонзотнинг ризқини таъмин этган, Унинг зиммасидадир. Мен фақат ўша ризқнинг баракасини сўрайман. Барака Аллоҳнинг махфий аскарларидан бири бўлиб, уни хоҳлаганига жўнатади. Агар ўша барака молга тушса, у кўпайиб кетади. Агар фарзандга туш…
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini noldan bepul oʻrganamiz📚
Arab Tilini n…
Ассалому алайкум ва роҳматуллоҳи ва барокатуҳ
Бугун якшанба
— 8 ноябрь 2026
— 28 жумадул аввал 1448
Эр-хотин ўртасидаги бахт-саодат фақат уларнинг бир-бирларига сабр қилишлари, яхшилик ва фарзандларининг тарбиясида ўзаро ҳамкорлик қилишлари билангина қарор топади. Аллоҳ ёрдам сўралгувчи Зотдир.
🤲Аллоҳим, оиламизга меҳр-муҳаббат, ўзаро ҳурмат ва барака ато этгин. Бир-биримизнинг айбларимизни кечирадиган, яхшиликда …
🩸 🩸🩸🩸🩸🅰️🩸❗️
🤩 JASUR VA JOZIBALI AYOLLAR TERITORIYASI💋
♥️Hanumka bilan nafis iforlar, zamonaviy ichki kiyimlar va qulay pijamalar har bir kuningizni yanada yoqimli qiladi🍫♥️
❌ QIZ BOLALAR VA ERKAKLAR KIRMASIN 🔠
📌https://t.me/+e8OnsnTgziplNzQy
📌https://t.me/+e8OnsnTgziplNzQy
ГЕМОРРОЙИМНИ ОПЕРАЦИЯ ҚИЛДИРИБ ОЛДИРГАН ЭДИМ.
Операциянинг азобини унутмаган эдим... Бу сафар ундан баттар, чидаб бўлмас оғриқ берадиган геморрой чиқди.
2чи маротаба операция қилдиришдан воз кечдим❌
Бир дамлама тайёрлаб геморройимга сурутган эдим... Атиги 3 кунда уша ташқарига чиқиб қолган ТУГУН изсиз йўқ бўлди. Ҳатто оғриқлар ҳам йўқ бўлди.
Бу қандай дамлама эканлигини шу ерда ёзиб қолдирдим👇👇👇
https://www.tabob…
6587. Аллоҳ зикри билан машғул бўлишнинг фойдаси
Ким ҳаётлик пайтида Аллоҳга, Унинг зикрига ва Унинг муҳаббатига машғул бўлса, руҳи Аллоҳ томон чиқаётганида энг муҳтож бўладиган нарсасини топади.
Ким ҳаётлик ва соғ пайтида ундан бошқа нарсага машғул бўлса, ўлими пайтида Аллоҳ билан машғул бўлиши қийинлашиб, оқибатда роббиси томонидан иноят ва кўмакка сазовор бўлмайди.
Шунинг учун оқил кимса қалби ва тилини ҳар қанда…
---Мен келин бўлиб тушган хонадоним катта оила эди.
Эримни ажрашган аммаси, ва аммасини қизи ҳам улар билан яшарди.
Тушлик пайти ошхонада.
—Келинойи, ҳалиги салатиздан қилиб беринг, жуда егим келяпти. -Мен аммамизни кизига кулиб қарадим.
—Ҳўп, кечга қилиб бераман.
Аммамизни кизи овқатга қошиқ солдию, ўқчиб ўрнидан туриб ташқарига чиқиб кетди. Мен ортидан ҳавотир олиб бордим.
—Яхшимисиз ? -сўрадим .
—Келинойии.…
Showing the 12 most recent of 738 posts we hold for @Kunlik_Duolarim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 17 posts on @Kunlik_Duolarim as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Kunlik_Duolarim named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@umar_ibin_hattob_seriali named in 1 post, 7 October 2026 – 7 October 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@withlove_ws named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Хикоялар Хадислар Ривоятлар Хикматлар @HikoyaNew · 24,757 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 15 September 2026
✨Arab tilida gaplashamiz✨ @arab_tilida_sozlashamiz · 46,534 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 25 August 2026
Namoz Vaqti Taqvim @Nomoz_Vaqtlarim · 141,943 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 August 2026
𝘮𝘶𝘩𝘢𝘮𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘹𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘢. @muhammadxonga · 35,445 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 26 August 2026
Tikuvchilik olami @Kelinchak_koylaklar_chevarlar · 21,486 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 18 September 2026
Duo va Zikrlar🤲 @Sahih_duolar_pg · 132,208 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 13 August 2026
☘🌸НУРЛИ ОШХОНАМ🌸☘ @nurlioshxona · 46,065 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 28 August 2026
Сардор домла @Sardor_Domla_Uz · 153,283 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Duolar va Zikrlar 🤲🏻” (@Kunlik_Duolarim), 44,967 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kunlik_Duolarim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.