Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

— Ⲕⲣυⲡⲡⲩⲱⲕⲁ 🪽

@Kruppu00

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

805subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003481020368
TypeChannel
Username@Kruppu00
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kruppu00

Growth

7558057807 August 2026 — 758 subscribers8 August 2026 — 758 subscribers8 August 2026 — 755 subscribers14 August 2026 — 805 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 748–813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:56805+50
8 Aug 2026, 04:21755-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:50758no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:33758first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.78%
avg views ÷ 805 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,496
Reactions total241
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54247424917043066437732.0%
custom 53526973659564331424217.4%
custom 51928781668336670213313.7%
custom 53305670831073203793213.3%
custom 5296735539817391425249.96%
custom 5296238156834709170177.05%
custom 5429484230088358164156.22%
custom 533008636030277845510.415%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC16 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— все, я почапала спать, все умнички, молодечики, люблю-люблю надеюсь на многа реакций тут, окда всем спокойной ночи, завтра пущу лоту без сп

custom 52967355398173914252custom 53526973659564331421custom 54247424917043066431

7 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC38 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— ребзи, ну вот опять та же песня, просмотров 18,реакций 6... не готовы ставить реакции? не смотрите мои посты, а если смотрите, будьте добры ставить реакции. мне нужны активные человечки

custom 52962381568347091708custom 51928781668336670215custom 52967355398173914253custom 53526973659564331422

7 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC45 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— чекайте што мне сделали😝😝 я обожаю ваши сигны, окдап хоть их мало все равно лублуу

custom 542474249170430664314custom 53305670831073203796custom 52967355398173914253custom 52962381568347091701custom 53526973659564331421

7 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53526973659564331421

7 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC44 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

сладких снов, и нет, даже несмотря на то, что у меня три часа ночи — я не буду призывать пиковую даму #рийчуха

custom 53305670831073203793custom 51928781668336670212custom 53526973659564331421custom 54247424917043066431

7 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC57 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— давайте вы оч многа реакций, а я лоту без сп на ночь?

custom 52967355398173914259custom 54247424917043066433custom 51928781668336670212custom 53526973659564331422

7 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC83 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— ебен бобен, почти 80,штоо

custom 53526973659564331425

7 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC173 views68 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— игра «наши дети» я 🖤 Криппушку, лапка, след лапки, ни грамму совести (котик на весах) - оставляем ребенка все остальные - аборт нах приз зависит от актива!! продолжение на 7+ реакций

custom 542474249170430664337custom 542948423008835816413custom 53305670831073203798custom 52962381568347091704custom 51928781668336670213custom 53526973659564331423

7 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC101 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— я хочу когда-нибудь заказать арт с фоном, бее, чтобы он был похож на пикчу которая на аве и поставить наконец арт на аву ...... или я хочу заказать арт который просила у лавра (по некоторым причинам арта не будит, хехе) и на аву поставитьь........... я много хочу, да

custom 53305670831073203798custom 53526973659564331421

7 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— огокак. я теперь ещё и в угадай гачерах мелькаю. крутяк

custom 53526973659564331422

7 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC71 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— всем доброе утро, как вы? как поспали? вы такие умничкиии, я вас так люблююю (у меня прилив нежносткй, молчите) а ещё, сегодня будет многа лоток (ну как много, минимум 3 если я правильно помню). 2 маленькие и 1... ну, большая

custom 53526973659564331425custom 52962381568347091702custom 54247424917043066431

6 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC96 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— я спать погнала (нет кнш), вы тоже давайти всем добрых снов, вы большие умницы, думаю скоро попробую лоту на 30 мест с сп....... страшно? да, но пробовать нужно... если на этом и на этом посту будет по 10-15 реакций завтра поделаю ловы на ос

custom 54247424917043066437custom 53526973659564331425custom 51928781668336670214custom 52967355398173914252custom 53300863603027784551custom 54294842300883581641

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Kruppu00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 237,881 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“— Ⲕⲣυⲡⲡⲩⲱⲕⲁ 🪽” (@Kruppu00), 805 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kruppu00.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.