Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝓚𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑛𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑦𝑎

@KrsHso13

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003733270100
TypeChannel
Username@KrsHso13
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/KrsHso13

Growth

608 August 2026 — 60 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:3060no change
8 Aug 2026, 17:1560first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
103.7%
avg views ÷ 60 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.2
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
50.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,244
Reactions total318
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

318 reactions across 6 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54516449084210299306821.4%
custom 54519661118452313586620.8%
custom 54520575817637328065517.3%
custom 5389082847124418619237.23%
custom 5294497814611535484226.92%
custom 5440532900313333352226.92%
custom 5388566725199425673175.35%
custom 5451891272040099483154.72%
custom 5472377016206526986134.09%
custom 5332303954996897391123.77%
custom 547215993567447954541.26%
custom 544966194779027024010.314%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KrsHso13. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC24 viewsread 10 August 2026

Пожалуйста, мнения, реакции и репосты🤗

9 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC26 views50 reactions10 Starsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 545164490842102993017custom 545189127204009948315custom 545196611184523135815custom 54520575817637328063

7 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC43 views54 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 545164490842102993018custom 545196611184523135818custom 545205758176373280618

6 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC63 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54516449084210299305custom 54519661118452313585custom 54520575817637328065

6 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC247 views86 reactions33 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💄🎀🤍𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑛𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑦𝑎🎀🥹🥹🤍𝑜𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑘𝑜 𝑆𝐻𝐸/𝐻𝐸𝑅, 6 arcan, 𝐼𝑁𝐹𝐽 ❤️ # 𝑀𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑛 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠. 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 🤩🤍𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑜𝑛

custom 545205758176373280629custom 545164490842102993028custom 545196611184523135828custom 54496619477902702401

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KrsHso13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 492,445 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓚𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑛𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑦𝑎” (@KrsHso13), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KrsHso13.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.