Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кристина PRO|TG

@KristinaPRO_TG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,662subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001499549413
TypeChannel
Username@KristinaPRO_TG
Created29 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KristinaPRO_TG

Growth

1,6621,6841,6736 August 2026 — 1,684 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,684 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,681 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,669 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,662 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,659–1,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:071,662-7
9 Aug 2026, 20:561,669-12
7 Aug 2026, 03:401,681-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:341,684no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:061,684first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 13 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3135.2%
🔥2123.9%
👏1112.5%
🤡1011.4%
👍77.95%
🥰44.55%
😁22.27%
😢22.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 May 2026, 10:03 UTC271 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

19 июня еду на CPC.Forum. Это международный форум про перфоманс-маркетинг и рекламные системы. Почему еду? Потому что сейчас у всех почти одинаковая история: ➡️ реклама дорожает ➡️ лиды достаются тяжелее ➡️ цикл сделки растёт ➡️ а планы по продажам никто не снижает На форуме как раз будут разбирать, что с этим делать. Что в программе: 🔹 100+ спикеров — Яндекс Реклама, Flowwow, Calltouch, RUTUBE, PREMIER, Skyeng

4🔥4👍2🥰1

6 Mar 2026, 06:36 UTC553 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Информация о запрете рекламы в Telegram не подтвердилась!!! В Ассоциации блогеров и агентств (АБА), которая объединяет более 100 000 блогеров, заявили, что были «крайне удивлены» появившимися сообщениями о возможных ограничениях. По данным ассоциации, на данный момент в базе дел ФАС отсутствует какое-либо официальное дело по этому вопросу, а также нет публичной позиции профильных ведомств. Более того, при регистрац

3

26 Dec 2025, 14:16 UTC834 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀 Как бренды меняют тон общения к концу года •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Привет, друзья! 👋🏻 Конец года — особенное время не только для людей, но и для брендов. Даже самые «сухие» компании в декабре начинают говорить иначе: теплее, спокойнее и человечнее. Это не случайность, а осознанная коммуникационная стратегия. Вот как и почему меняется тон общения ближе к праздникам. 🔹Меньше продаж — больше эмоций В дек

2🔥1🤡1

22 Dec 2025, 07:54 UTC570 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👑 Какая «реклама» сделала Telegram по-настоящему популярным •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Привет, друзья! 👋🏻 У Telegram не было одной громкой рекламной кампании, о которой говорили бы все. Платформа росла иначе — тихо, постепенно и очень органично. Telegram стал массовым благодаря не классической рекламе, а за счёт сочетания нескольких факторов, которые сработали сильнее любого маркетинга. 🔹Сарафанное радио

1👍1🤡1

19 Dec 2025, 08:50 UTC345 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А у вас сегодня уже включился рабочий режим — или, как обычно по пятницам, ещё грузится? 😅💓

1🤡1😁1

18 Dec 2025, 14:04 UTC301 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ваше время для отдыха тоже ценно! ✨

🤡21🥰1

18 Dec 2025, 10:20 UTC289 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‼️ Самые странные рекламные решения, которые неожиданно сработали •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Привет! 👋🏻 В рекламе часто ждут логики, понятных смыслов и «безопасных» идей. Но иногда именно странные, рискованные и на первый взгляд нелепые решения дают лучший результат. Разберём два примера, где странность стала главным преимуществом. 🔹Skittles — абсурд как стратегия Когда Skittles решил выделиться на фоне об

1🔥1🤡1

17 Dec 2025, 14:06 UTC211 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎨 Почему визуал задаёт отношение к контенту ещё до текста •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Привет! 👋🏻 Многие люди в мессенджерах сначала смотрят, и только потом читают. За доли секунды визуал формирует ощущение: хочется ли задержаться на посте, пролистнуть дальше или сохранить. И это происходит ещё до того, как мы осознаём, о чём вообще текст. Визуал давно перестал быть «украшением» — он стал частью смысла. 🔹Пе

1🔥1🤡1

17 Dec 2025, 08:01 UTC195 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скажи, что ты из digital, не говоря, что ты из digital. Узнали себя?⭐️

1🤡1😁1

15 Dec 2025, 08:05 UTC283 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡Когда реклама приходит не постом, а сторис с упоминанием •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Привет, друзья! 👋🏻 Если вы активно пользуетесь Telegram, то, скорее всего, уже сталкивались с этим форматом. В личку приходит уведомление: вас упомянули в истории. Открываешь — а там видео или фото с предложением услуги, курса или продукта. По сути, реклама, но в формате личного упоминания. Такое сейчас прилетает многим. Мн

2🔥2🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @KristinaPRO_TG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,112,114 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кристина PRO|TG” (@KristinaPRO_TG), 1,662 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KristinaPRO_TG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.