they changed the tax, don't trust devs like these
Signed Kraye

Channel
@KrayeCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001643960532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KrayeCalls |
| Description | Calls For The Real Ones Dm @Krayyebaby |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 2 May 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KrayeCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 21 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 21 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2022 to 29 May 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
they changed the tax, don't trust devs like these
Signed Kraye
https://t.me/ViperInu
Signed Kraye
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x27f7b46fe3858a6669ced4ac78bfb5da648d42f2 Idk anything about this but tax is super low. 5k mcap 1% tax in and out 1 month lp lock https://mudra.website/?certificate=yes&type=0&lp=0xf3416f4f4f6166539d780680d7352214163daf98
Signed Kraye
https://bscscan.com/address/0x635308e731a878741bfec299e67f5fd28c7553d9 this wallet with 2,8 million dollars worth of bnb funded the deployer wallet : https://bscscan.com/txs?a=0xf5b3a0fd5a8b7e09fee3660aa396053106c6881d
Signed Kraye
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xab4ea3e7dba39cb0b06914373068b3b1e61a5a33 this one is intresting
Signed Kraye
just found out the deployer is liked to this token, https://bscscan.com/token/0x65e60fff71a19193dff7a6070e3af097fdc309fb I would not get too excited. Let's see
Signed Kraye
idk if it's safe, but could be a gem if they pull off with their utility. Aped moon or dust bag
Signed Kraye
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x3ff651b3964d6c8d6a788bd83f1784eacf0e74d2 https://t.me/Gorirachain This one might be good 5.4k mcap
Signed Kraye
https://www.bonytoken.com/ https://twitter.com/BonyToken
Signed Kraye
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x13f237a8aa5862bb913bcd70d8f4bf222566c33d aped this one They say last project went past 2,4 mill
Signed Kraye
dev deployed this one before https://bscscan.com/token/0xd0accf05878cafe24ff8b3f82f194c62ed755707
Signed Kraye
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xe95005ec6024a4b3f4f231a4e417e91ccb758a8b i aped here
Signed Kraye
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KrayeCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@KrayeCalls named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“κραψεξαιισ” (@KrayeCalls), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KrayeCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.