2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,451–13,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:22
13,464
no change
18 Sept 2026, 20:47
13,464
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 14 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.37%
avg views ÷ 13,464 subscribers
Avg views / post
184
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held
18 (14 March 2025 – 12 September 2026)
Views total
920
Reactions total
45
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
225
Videos
20
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
213 reactions across 18 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
59
27.7%
❤
49
23.0%
✍
17
7.98%
🤣
13
6.10%
👌
12
5.63%
💔
12
5.63%
👎
10
4.69%
🤔
10
4.69%
💯
7
3.29%
😍
4
1.88%
😱
3
1.41%
😐
2
0.939%
😢
2
0.939%
😭
2
0.939%
🤮
2
0.939%
🥱
2
0.939%
❤🔥
1
0.469%
👏
1
0.469%
😁
1
0.469%
😎
1
0.469%
3 further kinds
3
1.41%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 18 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Knowledge_bloc_80. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 March 2025 to 12 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔴 پشماتون بریزه ؛ یه پسر ۲۸ ساله تو آمریکا برای دزدی وارد یه خونه میشه، ولی وقتی میبینه پای صاحب خونه از زیر پتو بیرونه، شروع میکنه به لیس زدن پاهاش!
دختره با ترس بیدار میشه و هرچی تلاش میکنه پاشو پس بکشه، نمیتونه.
آخرش به پلیس زنگ میزنه و پسره همونطور که داشته لیس میزده دستگیر میشه
ازدواج، ۵ سال اولش سخته!
تحقيقات Foundation Marriage:
اگر زوجها بتوانند ۵ سال اول رو در کنار هم سپری کنند، احتمال ۷۰٪ بیش از ۲۰ سال كنار هم خواهند ماند.
۵ سال اول معمولا پر از چالش است و ۷۰ درصد جداییها در این بازه رخ می دهد.
پ.ن : عددهای «۷۰٪» و «۲۰ سال» که در این پستها منتشر میشن، لزوماً بیانگر یک نتیجه قطعی و قابل تعمیم علمی نیستند. خود Marriage Foundation هم گزارش کرده که طلاق بیشتر در سالهای ابتدایی م…
🔺️قیمتهای اوایل سال ۹۷ رو ببینید انگار صد سال گذشته!
دلار ۵۰۵۰ تومن
طلا گرمی ۱۶۰هزار
سکه ۱ میلیون ۷۲۰هزار
مسکن متری ۵ میلیون و ۵۲۰هزار
پژو 206 ۳۴ میلیون
پراید ۲۲ میلیون
سراتو ۱۰۶ میلیون
برنج ۱۳ هزار
مرغ ۸۲۰۰
شير ۲۸۰۰
پیاز ۱۹۰۰
روغن مایع ۵۳۰۰
گوشت ۳۹۵۰۰
حداقل حقوق ۱,۲۰۰,۰۰۰ تومن
علت همیشه خسته بودن 🥱
🔰به آهن نیاز دارید
🔰خواب منظم ندارید
🔰تیروئیدتان کم کار است
🔰 بدنتان به اندازه آب ندارد
🔰به اندازه کافی نور آفتاب نمیگیرید
🔰نورهای مصنوعی مثل نور موبایل، لپ تاپ یا تبلت
‼️ثروتمندترین کشورهای جهان در ۲۰۲۶
💵 لوکزامبورگ 💵
▪️بر اساس تازهترین گزارش صندوق بینالمللی پول (IMF)، لوکزامبورگ با سرانه تولید ناخالص داخلی ۱۵۸,۷۳۰ دلار، ثروتمندترین کشور جهان در سال ۲۰۲۶ باقی ماند. ایرلند با ۱۴۰,۱۹۰ دلار و سوئیس با ۱۲۶,۱۸۰ دلار در رتبههای دوم و سوم قرار گرفتند.
چت جیپیتی برای من از دسترس خارج شد،
برای شما کار میکنه؟
👍67%
👎33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍4👎2🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Knowledge_bloc_80. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 12 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
نتیفآی - اینترنت بدون محدودیت @NetiFay · 93,368 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 18 September 2026
𝐁𝐚𝐝 𝐌𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐭 @Badmellat · 25,105 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کوئیز و دانستنی ها” (@Knowledge_bloc_80), 13,464 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Knowledge_bloc_80.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.