Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for tgk: Ovladaet

Channel

tgk: Ovladaet

@Kissmilaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

233subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003881216251
TypeChannel
Username@Kissmilaa
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 21 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kissmilaa

Growth

23323523415 Aug 2026, 03:48 — 235 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 04:00 — 235 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 14:45 — 233 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 03:4816 Aug 2026, 14:45
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:45233-2
15 Aug 2026, 04:00235no change
15 Aug 2026, 03:48235first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,178 reactions across 14 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.26% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5201854837460869089625.26%
custom 5201755078255485873544.58%
custom 5445094967330500081443.74%
custom 5359588413349575152433.65%
custom 5201814198480312112423.57%
custom 5442799156986942608423.57%
custom 5429506478018953189413.48%
custom 5287397640965746414403.40%
custom 5260506640272085626393.31%
custom 5429342105325570540383.23%
custom 5445165477808595285363.06%
custom 5359399078306264360332.80%
custom 5201752179152558438322.72%
custom 5427067894372533989322.72%
custom 5427227950623783022312.63%
custom 5192697825451861659292.46%
custom 5204193820815695422292.46%
custom 5445020033036087140292.46%
custom 5204066135732949740272.29%
custom 5429516450933018671262.21%
40 further kinds42936.4%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
348
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 20 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
102
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kissmilaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 4 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC618 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52380270735025993571custom 52381163873475189491custom 52404931707095194291

3 Jul 2026, 21:17 UTC680 views50 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

опят ищу класивого мальчика

custom 523802707350259935716custom 530330737235620705615custom 544077969342912683114custom 54003709445962722333custom 54720026797419089062

28 Jun 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,170 views144 reactions45 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 535958841334957515243custom 526050664027208562639custom 535939907830626436033custom 54202449823405309177custom 54743854374033950557custom 53595958135782246546custom 53998579622923606495custom 53597855738232974924

15 Jun 2026, 19:08 UTC≈1,130 views92 reactions56 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 520185483746086908931custom 520181419848031211225custom 520175507825548587323custom 520175217915255843813

13 Jun 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,330 views128 reactions102 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 520185483746086908931custom 520406613573294974027custom 520183660102972865123custom 520175217915255843810custom 520443502617903357410custom 52017550782554858739custom 52018141984803121129custom 52021427291187187719

10 Jun 2026, 12:43 UTC≈1,150 views108 reactions10 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 520419382081569542229custom 520175507825548587322custom 542951645093301867118custom 52017521791525584389custom 52018141984803121128custom 54295064780189531898custom 52040312219438000137custom 54270678943725339897

8 Jun 2026, 07:04 UTC965 views115 reactions33 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 528739764096574641432custom 542934210532557054030custom 542950647801895318925custom 54427991569869426089custom 54272279506237830228custom 54292230058824529955custom 53259086928586000264custom 54225430904916219082

7 Jun 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,290 views121 reactions10 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544279915698694260833custom 542706789437253398925custom 542722795062378302223custom 52873976409657464148custom 54292230058824529958custom 54293421053255705408custom 54295064780189531898custom 54295164509330186718

7 Jun 2026, 11:43 UTC745 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 54292230058824529953

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Kissmilaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,392,142 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“tgk: Ovladaet” (@Kissmilaa), 233 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kissmilaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.