Channel
@Kinsiderir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,115subscribers
-130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001330668008 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kinsiderir |
| Created | 2 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kinsiderir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 5,115 | -55 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 5,170 | -66 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 5,236 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 5,245 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 5,245 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,556 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😐 | 758 | 29.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 624 | 24.4% | |
| 😭 | 351 | 13.7% | |
| 💘 | 304 | 11.9% | |
| 💋 | 214 | 8.37% | |
| 🥴 | 136 | 5.32% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 3.56% | |
| 🤯 | 36 | 1.41% | |
| 👎 | 23 | 0.9% | |
| 🍓 | 9 | 0.352% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 0.235% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 0.156% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,556reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kinsiderir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 30 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
بیتیاس با شکستن رکورد هفتسالهی بیلبورد باکساسکور که از اوت 2019 در اختیار گروه رولینگ استون بود تاریخسازی کرد🎆 — بیتیاس تنها با برگزاری 12 کنسرت، 127.8 میلیون دلار درآمد کسب کرد و رکورد بیشترین درآمد ماهانه از تور کنسرت توسط یک گروه موسیقی را در تاریخ بیلبورد باکساسکور به نام خود ثبت کرد. 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋.𝖼𝗈𝗆 ;
💘296❤🔥19👎7🍓4💋2
این اوتفیتِ ممهیون [ آهیون ] برای کنسرت اخیر بیبیمانستر بشدت وایرال شده و آخوندای کرهای رو تریگر کرده و عقیدشون اینه نباید یه آیدل نسل پنجی ممههاشو انقدر صریح نشون بده که خب نظرشون در باسن ما جا داره. ولی جدای ازینا، اوتفیت آهیون خیلی موردتوجه قرار گرفته و همه براش فنگرلی کردن و خواهان استایلهای بیشتر این سبکین. 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋.𝖼𝗈𝗆 ;
💋186😐11😭11❤🔥10👎2👍1💘1
اخیرا اکانت دیلی مگزین فقط این بخش کوریو لیسارو پست میکنه و ازش تعریف میکنه ولی برخلاف تصور موج منفیاز انتقاد رو از جانب لوکال برای لیسا به همراه میاره : یسریا فنگرلی کردن واسهی استایل و کوریو و بدن لیسا، از طرفی جامعهی روشعنفکر آمپر چسبوندن و گفتن لیسا دید موزیکش فروش نمیره تصمیم گرفت استریپر شه و اینجوری واسه دوربینا ژست بگیره. 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋.𝖼𝗈𝗆 ;
😐198👍43🍓5👀2😭2👎1
اخیرا استریکیدز پریریلیز اموی جدید خودشون رو منتشر کرده که نتیزنای کرهای ادعا کردن شباهتهای زیادی بین اون و اموی آهنگ TRIGGER از د بویز درسال 2024 وجود داره! بخشهایی که بهشدت شباهت دارن لوکیشن فیلمبرداری، کارگردانی، استایل لباس، گریم و آرایش و ترکیببندی کلی تصاویر و همین باعث شده موج منفیای بهسمت سون سونگهی کارگردان هردو اموی بره و نتیزنا بگن استفاده از یک کانسپت برای دو هنرمند فقط نشون میده کارگردان ه…
🥴124👍20❤🔥14😐6👎2👀1
anok and who?
❤🔥312💋15😐7👍5👎3💘2👀1😭1
خیلی جدی توی توییتر فنهای جنی دارن جنی رو با آنوک یای، استورهی مدلینگ زیبای بلک مقایسه میکنن : بخشیاز توییتها انوک : بلک، زشت، برده جنی: سفید، زیبا، کویین اینکه به جنی میگن زشت، درحالی که اون واقعاً از آنوک یای در فهرست زیباترین زن جهان جلو زده، خودش یک انتخابه آیدل مورد علاقهم جنی، آنوک رو تموم کرد؛ تصور کن انقدر زیبا به نظر برسی، آنوک هرگز نمیتونه مثل اون باشه 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋.𝖼𝗈𝗆 ;
😐334😭15👎3🥴1
چندروز پیش دیسپچ عکس فرودگاهی از وینتر اسپا پست میکنه [ سمت راست ] و به دلیل بدفرم بودن صورت و بدنش موردحملهی فنهای اسپا قرار میگیره و سریعا عکس رو پاک میکنه. همین باعث میشه بحث تغییر قیافهی اعضای اسپا دوباره بولد بشه و نتیزنا به این اشاره کنن که اسام به فرم صورت دراز و باریک علاقهمنده و داره توی تغییر ظاهر آرتیستهاش زیاده روی میکنه. 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋.𝖼𝗈𝗆 ;
😭157👍20🤯6💔4
— نامجون توی کنسرت اخیر بیتیاس این متن روی بنر یکیاز فنها رو میخونه: نامجون : اوه لزبینها عاشق بیتیاس هستن، این خیلی خوبه. — این توجه نامجون بشدت از جامعهی LGBTQ موردتحسین قرار گرفته شد 🏳️🌈 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋.𝖼𝗈𝗆 ;
❤🔥266💋11😭7💘5👀2👎2🤯1
وایرال شدهی از نورث وستِ ۱۳ ساله، دختر کانیه وست و کیم کارداشیان که واقعا نمیدونم چرا انقدر طرفدار داره. 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋.𝖼𝗈𝗆 ;
😐202🤯6😭4🥴3👎1
لاتو چندروز پیش این استایل الهام گرفته از خرچنگش رو توی اینستاگرامش پست کرده که از نظر خیلیها ویرد بوده. 𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋.𝖼𝗈𝗆 ;
😭154🤯23🥴8❤🔥3👍2👎2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Kinsiderir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,168,867 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ 𝗸 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿.” (@Kinsiderir), 5,115 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kinsiderir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.