Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KING OF EQUITY

Channel

KING OF EQUITY

@King_ofEquity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,675subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001197611780
TypeChannel
Username@King_ofEquity
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/King_ofEquity

Growth

15,62915,70515,6676 August 2026 — 15,705 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,704 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,695 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,696 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,695 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,663 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,659 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,643 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,632 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,629 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,637 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,660 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,675 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,682 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,675 subscribers15,6756 August 202624 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 18 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,618–15,716 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 23:0615,675-7
23 Aug 2026, 12:0515,682+7
21 Aug 2026, 19:5615,675+15
20 Aug 2026, 17:3815,660+23
19 Aug 2026, 17:1615,637+8
18 Aug 2026, 20:4615,629-3
17 Aug 2026, 19:2515,632-11
16 Aug 2026, 16:2815,643-16
13 Aug 2026, 11:1615,659-4
12 Aug 2026, 10:0715,663-18
11 Aug 2026, 08:0215,681-14
10 Aug 2026, 04:4615,695-1
9 Aug 2026, 02:5515,696+1
8 Aug 2026, 04:5715,695-9
7 Aug 2026, 03:0715,704-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:4515,705first reading

Engagement

171 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.48%
avg views ÷ 15,675 subscribers
Avg views / post
859
171 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.376%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
171
of 171 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 164 of 171 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held171 (6 August 202624 August 2026)
Views total146,963
Reactions total529
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

529 reactions across 163 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19436.7%
👍9017.0%
🙏8816.6%
👌305.67%
🎉244.54%
🔥193.59%
🦄183.40%
👏163.02%
🏆112.08%
💯91.70%
🤩91.70%
81.51%
🫡81.51%
🥰50.945%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 164 of the 171 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 529reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC646 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Shilpa Medicare. 😊☝️ ✅ Intraday 6% Up 📌 Must Read My Golden Words. Clearly Mentioned that Chart Is Strong & If Stock Give Any Dip Then It's Value Buying. Also Mentioned, Stock Will Give Good REWARDS. 🤷‍♂ 👉 Stock Made Low 🔻 400 & Today Made High ⬆️ 866.65 ✈️💥🚀 💵 Within 4 Months Stock Gave 117% Huge Returns. 💰

2

24 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC788 views5 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Keep On Radar. (It's Not Recommendations) IDBI BANK. Cmp @ 89.60 Chart is Strong. Disclaimer : Investments based on recommendations in the research report are subject to market risk. Registration granted by SEBI, Enlistment as RA with Exchange and certification from NISM in no way guarantee performance of the intermediary or provide any assurance of returns to investors.

👍41

24 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC942 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

SIEMENS. 😊☝️ ✅ Intraday 5% Up 👉 3854 to 4110 ✈️ 💰 7% Huge Returns in Just Few Days.

3

24 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC995 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🔵 1) LENSKART 😊☝️ 👉 After Given My view stock made low 619 to 673.90 ✈️ 💰 9% Huge Returns in Just 4 Days. 🔵 2) WELSPUN LIVING. 😊☝️ ✅ Intraday 3% Up 👉 After Given My view stock made low 172.56 to 195 ✈️ 💰 14% Huge Returns in Just 4 Days. Join Us 📲 wa.me/918460814494

2🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC913 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

MOTILAL OSWAL. 😊☝️ ✅ Intraday 2% Up 👉 835.10 to 1015 ✈️ 💰 21% Huge Returns in Just Few Days.

🎉2

24 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC981 views11 reactionsread 24 August 2026

🙏 Good Morning Everyone 💐 🕉 ॐ नमः शिवाय। 🕉

🙏101

23 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC923 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

LENSKART. 😊☝️ 👉 530 to 663.80 ✈️ 💰 25% Huge Returns in Just Few Days.

💯21

23 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC827 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

PIRAMAL PHARMA. 😊☝️ 👉 After Given My view stock made low 158 to 220.36 ✈️ 💰 39% Huge Returns in Just Few Days.

2🔥1

23 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC710 views4 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Balrampur Chini. 😊☝️ 👉 After Given My view stock made low 510 to 781 ✈️ 💰 53% Huge Returns in Just Few Days.

👍4

23 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC721 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

DIXON TECH. 😊☝️ 👉 10570 to 14953 ✈️ 💰 41% Huge Returns in Just Few Weeks.

🦄2

23 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC693 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

SHRIRAM FINANCE. 😊☝️ 👉 After Given My view stock made low 863 to 1153 ✈️ 💰 34% Huge Returns in Just Few Weeks. 🚀📈

🫡2

23 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC705 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

PNB HOUSING FIN. 😊☝️ 👉 After Given My view stock made low 950 to 1207 ✈️ 💰 27% Huge Returns in Just Few Days. 🚀📈

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @King_ofEquity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@King_ofEquity edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTCAnonymous Poll103 voters

🙏 I Request all of you for Maximum Participation in This Poll. 💵 Are You Able To Earn Profits From TRADES❓Like●MARKSANS ●SHILPA ●JUBL FOOD ●MOTHERSON ●TATA TECH ●AMARA RAJA ●SUMITOMO ●AJANTA PHARMA ●DIVIS LAB How is the Movement of Our Recommended View❓

  1. EXCELLENT.73%
  2. GOOD.13%
  3. Need to Improve.15%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Poll161 voters

🙏 I Request all of you for Maximum Participation in This Poll. 💵 Are You Able To Earn Profits From TRADES❓ ●MOTHERSON ●TATA TECH. ●SHILPA ●SONA BLW ●TITAN ●TVS MOTORS ●EXIDE ●AURO ●M&M FIN ●NESTLE ●PPL PHARMA How is the Movement of Our Recommended View❓

  1. EXCELLENT.70%
  2. GOOD.17%
  3. Need to Improve.12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Best Intraday | Stock tips | |INDEX OPTIONS
@best_intraday_stock · 91,800
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 16 August 2026
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿™
@TheTradiingDoctor · 56,216
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KING OF EQUITY” (@King_ofEquity), 15,675 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/King_ofEquity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.