Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for King Imposter_official

Channel

King Imposter_official

@KingImposter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

244subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002178599706
TypeChannel
Username@KingImposter
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KingImposter

Growth

243244243.512 Aug 2026, 08:32 — 243 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 08:45 — 243 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 08:33 — 244 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 08:3213 Aug 2026, 08:33
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 243–244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:33244+1
12 Aug 2026, 08:45243no change
12 Aug 2026, 08:32243first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.7%
avg views ÷ 244 subscribers
Avg views / post
246
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held17 (11 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total3,440
Reactions total369
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 05s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

438 reactions across 17 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥11626.5%
💘4510.3%
custom 5406675578629694070368.22%
368.22%
custom 5395445287122673483337.53%
custom 5406935802108221148306.85%
custom 5291876729214766700276.16%
custom 5291944563928240140214.79%
custom 5294330048893982875204.57%
custom 5292231953074921470163.65%
🔥163.65%
🤩132.97%
💋81.83%
custom 529178442607261442451.14%
custom 529200015798492229540.913%
🥰30.685%
😭20.457%
custom 530993931296234150410.228%
10.228%
😍10.228%
4 further kinds40.913%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 438reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KingImposter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC86 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ Осторожно, кровь ⚠️ Быстрый арт, не судите строга

custom 529433004889398287517🔥6❤‍🔥3custom 540667557862969407021😍1custom 52922319530749214701

7 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC119 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тут

custom 540693580210822114816custom 54066755786296940708custom 52943300488939828753custom 53954452871226734833

Signed King lime

7 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC148 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Где жиробас

custom 540667557862969407024custom 53954452871226734835custom 54069358021082211484

Signed фортегрин депрессия

5 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC187 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚠️Осторожно, кровь⚠️ Я решила попробовать новые кисти, и в принципе вышло неплохо Кому интересно можете посмотреть процесс рисования этого арта

❤‍🔥19custom 54069358021082211486custom 53954452871226734834custom 540667557862969407021🔥1custom 52918767292147667001custom 52920001579849222951

1 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC291 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

бу, ночной завоз. В видео присутствовали::: (всех участников выбирала Кинг🌟) Лампочка — 00:00 Фин — 00:12 Кейл — 00:20 Космо — 00:29 СПМ — 00:41 Кирилл — 00:50 Фоня — 01:02 Ананасик — 01:14 Кири — 01:27 Мими — 01:37 РКН — 01:48 Часть 3/??? и вообще я устао такие видео делать🤌👊

custom 539544528712267348316❤‍🔥5💋5💘2😭2custom 52918767292147667002🤯1😱1

Signed 𝙂𝙖𝙩𝙫𝙤𝙧𝙠

31 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC209 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52919445639282401409custom 54069358021082211484❤‍🔥3custom 53954452871226734832

31 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC226 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥17custom 52918767292147667004custom 53954452871226734833

Signed 𝙂𝙖𝙩𝙫𝙤𝙧𝙠

30 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC463 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Буэээ В видео присутсвовали:: (всех участников отбирала Кинг🌟) Буффи — 00:00 Няшк — 00:12 Панда — 00:21 Оранж — 00:30 Валидол (нищ сыр) — 00:40 Ариго — 00:53 Часть 2/???

💘21custom 529187672921476670065custom 52920001579849222953❤‍🔥1custom 52922319530749214701

Signed 𝙂𝙖𝙩𝙫𝙤𝙧𝙠

30 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC187 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Бро это шикарно

❤‍🔥10💘3

Signed King lime

30 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC280 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

многие проголосовали за хедканоны на голоса участников чата Кинга, так чтоооо... Мои хедканоны на голоса,, В видео присутствуют:: Кинг — 00:00 Вова — 00:12 Кисло — 00:24 Тв — 00:35 Метеора — 00:48 Луи Сан — 00:58 Ангел — 01:08 Гатворк — 01:19 часть 1/??? (возможно других частей не будет)

❤‍🔥13custom 52918767292147667008🔥3🥰3

Signed 𝙂𝙖𝙩𝙫𝙤𝙧𝙠

29 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTC203 views25 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

чтоо кароче вторая часть завтра и тд

❤‍🔥14💋3🔥2custom 52917844260726144242😎1😢1custom 52918767292147667001custom 52922319530749214701

Signed 𝙂𝙖𝙩𝙫𝙤𝙧𝙠

25 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC326 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

бэээ смотрите че добавил🤩

💘113custom 52918767292147667002❤‍🔥1

Signed 𝙂𝙖𝙩𝙫𝙤𝙧𝙠

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @KingImposter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 883,260 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“King Imposter_official” (@KingImposter), 244 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KingImposter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.