Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Killer FX Global

@KillerFXTech

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

380subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001424796873
TypeChannel
Username@KillerFXTech
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KillerFXTech

Growth

3808 Aug 2026, 08:04 — 380 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:41 — 380 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:048 Aug 2026, 15:41
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 379–381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:41380no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:04380first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

162 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10766.0%
👏2414.8%
1811.1%
😱53.09%
🤩31.85%
🤯31.85%
❤‍🔥21.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC203 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔴Fala Pessoal🔴 Depois de algumas semanas invicto, o Killer FX dessa semana foi para o ralo. 👏Apesar do resultado, fico muito feliz em ver que 100% das pessoas conectadas seguiram exatamente a gestão de risco que orientamos: entraram com o valor mínimo possível e apenas com um capital que estavam dispostas a perder. ✅Vimos isso pelos números de pessoa conectadas X valor da banca. ❤️Esse sempre foi o propósito do K

🔥6😱5

1 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC253 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❗ATENÇÃO KILLER FX❗ Durante as ultimas semanas, o KILLER FX estava sendo gerenciado em seu modo ultraconservador, pois ainda estávamos finalizando toda a estrutura do Scale FX & Killer Prime. Agora que o Scale FX já está pronto e o KILLER PRIME está voltando essa semana, o KILLER FX retorna oficialmente ao seu padrão original de operação**: ⚠️ RISCO EXTREMO ⚠️ Alta alavancagem ⚠️ Alta volatilidade ⚠️ Alto potenci

🔥8

12 Jun 2026, 07:25 UTC238 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔴 ATIVAÇÃO KILLER FX 🔴 👨‍💻 O KILLER FX chegou para quem busca performance de verdade no mercado. 📊 Desenvolvido com tecnologia HFT (High Frequency Trading), o KILLER FX atua como um verdadeiro sniper operacional, analisando o mercado em alta velocidade para identificar oportunidades de entrada com máxima precisão. 🎯 Seu objetivo é simples: buscar o maior potencial de rentabilidade possível através de operações ráp

🔥124

11 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTC209 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨📈 ATUALIZAÇÃO INSANA 🚨📈 De ontem para hoje… FOI AINDA MAIS ALTO! 🔥🔥 💹 +51.59% ➡️ +58.82% O dinheiro nunca dorme… e os que estão posicionados ESTÃO APROVEITANDO A ONDA 🌊 Enquanto muitos ainda estão a "analisar"... outros já estão a RECOLHER resultados ⚡ Isto não é sorte… isto é execução. 👀 E então, e tu? Assistir à margem ou entrar no jogo? 🔗 https://ma.valetax.com/guest/ct-strategies/3381256

🔥153🤩3

10 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC157 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

O que é melhor: +51,59% no KILLER FX ou continuar perdendo dinheiro em lançamentos aleatórios? 🥷📈 O novo formato já está em movimento. 🚀 Resultados de +51,59% — e estamos apenas começando. Enquanto muitos ainda tentam entender o mercado... outros já estão executando. ⚡ 👀 Se você estava esperando um sinal, este é. 🔗 https://ma.valetax.com/guest/ct-strategies/3381256

👏12🤯3

27 May 2026, 21:36 UTC194 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

O que é melhor 42 % no killer ou derreter seu dinheiro em lançamentos ?

🔥13❤‍🔥2👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KillerFXTech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 706,749 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Killer FX Global” (@KillerFXTech), 380 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KillerFXTech.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.