Channel
@KhusansBlog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,600subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002615569618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KhusansBlog |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KhusansBlog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 11,600 | -12 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 11,612 | -19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 11,631 | -16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 11,647 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 11,652 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 11,651 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,907 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,113 | 69.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1,366 | 23.1% | |
| 🎉 | 339 | 5.74% | |
| 💔 | 89 | 1.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,907reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KhusansBlog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 March 2026 to 23 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Mening ilovam 3000+ users dan oshdik🔥. Bu ilovada: ✅Barcha imtixonda tushadigan IELTS Speaking topics bor. ✅ Band 8.5 sample answers ham bor. ✅Mutlaqo bepul For iPhone users —> Yuklab olish For Android users —> Yuklab olish
🔥201❤70🎉20💔5
Real IELTS Speaking Test olibdi. Real Examiner: Mr Tim 🚀 Candidate: Khusan A 😇 📹 —> Video
❤195🔥56🎉22💔2
😀 ✨Speaking of (C1) — haqida gapiradigan bo’lsam, ga kelsak • Speaking of his personality, he is really kind. • Speaking of my exam, I unfortunately failed. • Speaking of its advantages, it is fast and economical.
❤171🔥48🎉23💔5
😀 ✨ To drag on (C1) Uz: cho‘zilib ketmoq, keragidan ortiq davom etmoq (asosan zerikarli va charchatadigan holda) • The meeting dragged on for hours and everyone got bored. • The lecture dragged on and on, and I lost focus.
❤128🔥36🎉14💔6
😀 ✨To go down the drain (C2) Uz: behuda ketmoq, zoye bo‘lmoq • All my effort went down the drain. • We spent so much money, but it all went down the drain. • If my project fails, thousands of dollars will go down the drain.
❤116🔥32🎉28💔2
😀 ✨To hold yourself back (C1) — o‘zingni tiyib turmoq, o‘zini to‘xtatib turmoq, o‘zini ushlab turmoq • What’s holding you back from starting your own business? • I wanted to say something bad, but I just held myself back. • Even though I was very angry, I held myself back. • Sometimes, it’s fear that holds people back from making progress.
❤113🔥41🎉16
😀 ✨Fair enough (B2) — Tushunarli. Mayli, qabul qilaman. • It’s raining outside, let’s stay home. — Fair enough. • I think we should split the bill. — Fair enough. • He needs more time. — Fair enough, but please tell him we can’t wait much longer.
❤121🔥53🎉12💔6
😀 ✨It’s a long shot (C1) — amalga oshish ehtimoli juda past • It’s a long shot, but I’m going to give it a try. • I think winning that competition is a long shot. • Getting a visa to South Korea is a long shot.
🔥133❤55🎉21💔10
😀 ✨To backfire (C2) — teskari natija bermoq • His plan backfired • His joke backfired and offended everyone. • He thought it would help, but it backfired.
🔥160❤73🎉20💔8
😀 ✨To flatter (C1) — xushomad qilmoq, xushomad qilib maqtamoq (foyda olish uchun) • He’s clearly flattering the teacher to get better grades. • I know he was flattering me because he wanted to borrow some money. • I hate it when people flatter me — it feels fake
🔥169❤69🎉20💔6
😀 ⚡ To compromise (C1) — zarar yetkazmoq, yomonlashtirmoq • Lack of sleep can eventually compromise your health. • Negative thinking can compromise your confidence • Buy a better camera. This cheap one may compromise the quality of the video.
🔥233❤94🎉32💔12
Bu men Khusan Abdumuminov😇 Bugundan boshlab, Har kuni bitta/ ikkita muhim so’z/ phrase o’rgatib bormoqchiman. Men bilanmisiz❓ ❤️ — Yeees
❤1,500🔥100🎉41💔13
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @KhusansBlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,065,107 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“American Pronunciation | Khusans Blog” (@KhusansBlog), 11,600 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KhusansBlog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.