International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
7,940 average views per post against 1,904 subscribers — an engagement rate of 416.9%. Across the 15,813 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 8.34% and 32.3%, with a median of 17.2%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
20 of 20 published in the window (7 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
158,758
Mature posts only
416.9% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,895–1,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 10:04
1,904
-33
8 Aug 2026, 16:54
1,937
-30
7 Aug 2026, 20:33
1,967
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:49
1,967
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
416.9%
avg views ÷ 1,904 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,940
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (15 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
158,758
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
پیامدهای امنیتی و اجتماعی جنگ علیه ایران د رخیابانهای انگلیس
روزنامه تلگراف در گزارشی به پیامدهای اجتماعی و امنیتی افزایش قیمت سوخت ناشی از جنگ علیه ایران در بریتانیا پرداخته است که برخی محورهای این گزارش به شرح زیر است: افزایش سرقت سوخت در انگلیس نشان میدهد آثار جنگ علیه ایران دیگر تنها در بازارهای انرژی یا محاسبات ژئوپلیتیکی دیده نمیشود، بلکه مستقیماً به زندگی روزمره شهروندان اروپایی و افزایش جرائم ناشی از فشار…
جرقههای اعتراض در اردن بابت همدستی در جنگ علیه ایران
روزنامه والاستریت ژورنال در گزارشی به بررسی پیامدهای جنگ آمریکایی-صهیونی علیه ایران برای اردن پرداخته و نشان میدهد که ادامه این جنگ، این کشور را بیش از هر زمان دیگری در معرض حملات ایران و نارضایتی داخلی قرار داده است.
@Khabar_Graphic
@TasnimNews
کابوس رکود برای اقتصاد انگلیس در صورت انسداد هرمز
روزنامه ایندیپندنت در گزارشی به پیامدهای اقتصادی تداوم بستهماندن تنگه هرمز برای بریتانیا پرداخته و هشدار داده است که ادامه این وضعیت میتواند اقتصاد این کشور را وارد رکود کند.
@Khabar_Graphic
@TasnimNews
جنگ با مردم؛ چرا رسانههای فارسیزبان معاند ناامیدی میفروشند؟
در دنیایی که اطلاعات به سلاح تبدیل شده است، تنها راه مقابله، توانمندسازی مخاطب است. رسانهها مسئولیت دارند که شفافتر، مستندتر و اخلاقیتر گزارش کنند، اما تا زمانی که این اتفاق نیفتاده است، هر یک از ما بهعنوان مخاطب، وظیفه داریم با سواد رسانهای خود، از سلامت روانی و تابآوری اجتماعیمان محافظت کنیم. خیانت، دروغگویی صرف نیست؛ خیانت، ناامیدیِ مسلّح است.
…
چرا مرکز داده آمازون در بحرین توسط ایران هدف قرار گرفت؟
انهدام شرکت آمازون در بحرین توسط سپاه بخشی از برنامه کاهش توان شناسایی، کنترل و فرماندهی آمریکاست.
به بیان جزئیاتی از انبوه خسارات وارد شده به ارتش تروریستی آمریکا در جریان حملات سپاه به پایگاههای این کشور در اطراف ایران پرداخت که یکی از مهمترین آنها حمله به یک مرکز پردازش داده مربوط به شرکت آمریکایی آمازون در بحرین بود؛ هدفی که شاید در نگاه اول غیر نظامی و …
افسر سابق گارد شاهنشاهی: رضا پهلوی از مشکلات روانی رنج میبرد
فرامرز دادرس مدعی شد: رضا پهلوی از مشکلات روحی و روانی رنج میبرد و بهگفته فرح پهلوی، قبلاً سه بار در یک آسایشگاه روانی بستری شده است.
@Khabar_Graphic
@TasnimNews
روش جدید پنتاگون برای لاپوشانی تلفات جنگ علیه ایران
روزنامه گاردین در گزارشی مینویسد تصمیم دولت تروریستی ترامپ برای تغییر نحوه ثبت تلفات جنگ ایران، با موجی از انتقاد کهنهسربازان و سیاستمداران آمریکایی مواجه شده است؛ منتقدان معتقدند این اقدام تلاشی برای کمرنگ جلوه دادن هزینههای انسانی جنگ و کاهش فشارهای سیاسی بر کاخ سفید است.
@Khabar_Graphic
@TasnimNews
تلفات نظامیان آمریکایی در جنگ با ایران بهاعتراف پنتاگون
وزارت دفاع آمریکا (پنتاگون) در آخرین آمار خود اعلام کرد: از زمان آغاز جنگ با ایران در 28 فوریه، 18 نظامی کشته و 624 نفر دیگر زخمی شدهاند.
پنتاگون افزود که بر اثر حملات ایران در روزهای اخیر، 4 نظامی آمریکایی کشته و 140 نفر دیگر زخمی شدهاند. تعداد کشتههای آمریکا بعد از نقض تفاهمنامه بالای 200 نفر است.
@Khabar_Graphic
@TasnimNews
ضربه 21میلیارددلاری ایران به آمریکا در جنگ 2هفتهای اخیر
خساراتی که برآورد میشود آمریکاییها در این 15 روز متحمل شدهاند تقریباً 20 تا 21 میلیارد دلار است.
@Khabar_Graphic
@TasnimNews
ایران با انهدام سامانهها، هیبت نظامی آمریکا را هدف گرفت
لری جانسون، تحلیلگر سیاسی و افسر سابق سازمان سیا (CIA): وقتی سامانههای هشدار و دفاع، دقیق آسیب ببینند، موازنه میدان تغییر میکند و این فشار آمریکا را به سمت عقبنشینی سوق میدهد.
@Khabar_Graphic
@TasnimNews
افزایش مجدد قیمت سوخت جت شرکتهای آمریکا را غافلگیر کرد
با افزایش تنشها در خاورمیانه، قیمت سوخت جت مجدداً افزایش یافت و شرکتهای آمریکایی با چالش جدی مواجه شدند. افزایش چشمگیر قیمت سوخت جت در روزهای اخیر، شرکتهای هواپیمایی آمریکا را ناچار به بازنگری در پیشبینی سودآوری خود کرده است، این تحول نشان میدهد که نوسانات هزینه سوخت با چهسرعتی میتواند از رشد درآمد ناشی از تقاضای قوی سفر پیشی بگیرد.
@Khabar_Graphic
@Tas…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Khabar_Graphic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 931,259 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبرگرافی” (@Khabar_Graphic), 1,904 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Khabar_Graphic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.