Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ᴀᴍᴜ

@Kgnrbwvidpg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004415908990
TypeChannel
Username@Kgnrbwvidpg
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 8 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kgnrbwvidpg

Growth

3311 Aug 2026, 01:16 — 33 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 10:04 — 33 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 01:1611 Aug 2026, 10:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:0433no change
11 Aug 2026, 01:1633first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.7%
avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.2
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
32.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held9 (8 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total299
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54227134589593491102121.6%
custom 53301805188708235561919.6%
custom 54249492557248927941717.5%
custom 53300856602231194911515.5%
custom 53571066395120327331313.4%
custom 535970357860265979888.25%
custom 541108873483574391522.06%
custom 546561705121522175222.06%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC26 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я так люблю эту манхву. Гспд молюст на экранизацию https://youtube.com/shorts/RUBt0La13JQ?si=28d9YDXNAGq7ploH

custom 54249492557248927944custom 53571066395120327332custom 54227134589593491102custom 54110887348357439151

Signed НЕ Вступаю во флуды

9 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC30 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Я тут на несколько сообщений перепутала щитпост и основу... Но зато поделилась интересным :3 Была сегодня на арт-маркете метаморфозе вместе с Анхен Было очень вайбово и стилево 🤩

custom 53571066395120327334custom 53301805188708235563custom 54249492557248927943custom 53300856602231194912custom 53597035786026597981custom 54110887348357439151custom 54227134589593491101

Signed НЕ Вступаю во флуды

9 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC33 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я смачно обгорела

custom 53571066395120327332custom 53597035786026597982custom 54249492557248927942custom 54227134589593491101

Signed НЕ Вступаю во флуды

9 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC34 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Мои любимые кошечки 🤩

custom 53301805188708235565custom 53300856602231194913custom 54249492557248927942

Signed НЕ Вступаю во флуды

9 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC33 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @taboretkinpodval

Posted without readable text

custom 54227134589593491104custom 54249492557248927944custom 53301805188708235563custom 54656170512152217521

Signed НЕ Вступаю во флуды

9 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC35 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Это блять... Я 8к за день депнула

custom 54227134589593491106custom 53300856602231194913custom 53301805188708235563

Signed НЕ Вступаю во флуды

9 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC35 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я потратила по ощущениям 6к...

custom 54227134589593491107custom 53300856602231194913custom 53301805188708235563

Signed НЕ Вступаю во флуды

8 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC37 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Поиграла в пейнтбол и теперь у меня синяк на руке :_) Если что я не выбывала три игры и на четвертой самая первая вышла

custom 53597035786026597985custom 53571066395120327332custom 54249492557248927942

Signed НЕ Вступаю во флуды

8 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC36 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @cosbandminecraftPhoto

Косбенд «ЖНТ» 🤩🤩С днем рождения🤩🤩 ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ Сегодня 8 августа - день, в который был создан наш косбенд За этот год много всего случилось, и самое главное, что все это время мы были вместе Хотим сказать спасибо всем, кто был с нами этот год, кто следит за нашим творчеством И мы ни в коем случае не собираемся останавливаться, ведь Дальше - Больше!! ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ Анонимка Все мы знаем что

custom 53300856602231194914custom 53571066395120327333custom 53301805188708235562custom 54656170512152217521

Signed НЕ Вступаю во флуды

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Kgnrbwvidpg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,138,464 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴀᴍᴜ” (@Kgnrbwvidpg), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kgnrbwvidpg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.