I aped this shit here, maybe cat meta will flip dog? CA: AYFrik7wqDCoc6YAYE3NkaU8yuEsCWRhgWskiibyFQwh

Channel
Kevin Calls!
@KevRich777
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001957190759 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KevRich777 |
| Description | It’s just Kevin that will pump your bag! |
| Created | 21 July 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KevRich777 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 21 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 3
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 23s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2023 to 28 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
CATO Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 0.5 SOL ($93.09) 🔀 39 471,68 CATO 👤 CU12ij...LkMw | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $703 800 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
https://x.com/bobaoppa?t=odqVVsl5fDU7v7vS8szTvw&s=09 I ape this shit anyway! Moon or dust I dont care. I have a lot of sol mfer! 😄
This mfer i hope he rots in hell!
Bye. Enjoy
Chads In Action Buy! 🕵🏻♂️🕵🏻♂️🕵🏻♂️ 🔀 Spent $46.07 (0.247 SOL) 🔀 Got 12,470 CIA 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 Position +74% 💸 Market Cap $36,949 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
Gambling CIA! CA: 4gyzf1rfMhGNfu8qEyias6v5vkdbxhzD5YZoHHCBX7wf Pure gambling, so dyor!
If you follow this move, you are in two times right now, just hold and thank me later. 😐
🔥1
Bought $TWTR here, its in dip right now. CA: 93HkTBvMHt7V9H7k4NC4DTGNWM9EpByjAoE7wwoCQJCc The team and community still there. This is out of the meta, but worth to try tho! DYOR!
TWTR Buy! 🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦 🔀 Spent $158.58 (0.85 SOL) 🔀 Got 1,593,430 TWTR 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 Position +11% 🏷 Price $0.0000995 💸 Market Cap $995,186 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
Bag some Rex at this mcap, could be a next pepe? Who knows will bet my monies here. The peng dev back this shit up! CA: CcTxKZHqU4E2Tek5gh1GZoPZPHncGFkZ36EVMsgDn6sK Always Dyor!!!
Rex Buy! 🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖 🔀 Spent $932.80 (5 SOL) 🔀 Got 15,208 REX 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 💸 Market Cap $6,133,488 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @KevRich777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@KevRich777 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kevin Calls!” (@KevRich777), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KevRich777.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.