Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kenzie Anne πŸ’–

Channel

Kenzie Anne πŸ’–

@Kenzie_Anne_misskenzieannefans

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

13,758subscribers

-108 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002697169206
TypeChannel
Username@Kenzie_Anne_misskenzieannefans
CreatedBetween 1 April 2025 and 31 July 2025 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kenzie_Anne_misskenzieannefans

Topic

Other / unclassifiable β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,74513,86613,805.57 August 2026 β€” 13,866 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 13,861 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 13,850 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 13,846 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 13,835 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 13,810 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 13,801 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 13,820 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 13,849 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 13,825 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 13,836 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 13,847 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 13,835 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 13,843 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 13,828 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 13,816 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 13,808 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 13,796 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 13,819 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 13,846 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 13,821 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 13,823 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 13,793 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 13,769 subscribers4 September 2026 β€” 13,758 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 13,767 subscribers10 September 2026 β€” 13,779 subscribers12 September 2026 β€” 13,770 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 13,745 subscribers15 September 2026 β€” 13,747 subscribers17 September 2026 β€” 13,758 subscribers13,7587 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,727–13,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:1813,758+11
15 Sept 2026, 17:3713,747+2
13 Sept 2026, 23:4113,745-25
12 Sept 2026, 08:5713,770-9
10 Sept 2026, 01:3713,779+12
6 Sept 2026, 16:1513,767+9
4 Sept 2026, 06:1513,758-11
2 Sept 2026, 20:3313,769-24
1 Sept 2026, 22:1813,793-30
31 Aug 2026, 19:5513,823+2
30 Aug 2026, 22:5713,821-25
29 Aug 2026, 19:3713,846+27
28 Aug 2026, 18:5413,819+23
27 Aug 2026, 22:2613,796-12
26 Aug 2026, 23:2313,808-8
25 Aug 2026, 23:4713,816-12
25 Aug 2026, 02:4713,828-15
23 Aug 2026, 15:1413,843+8
21 Aug 2026, 23:4713,835-12
20 Aug 2026, 18:3913,847first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
0.978%
avg views Γ· 13,758 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.61%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held35 (7 August 2025 – 2 September 2026)
Views total1,346
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 09s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

479 reactions across 35 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀18839.2%
πŸ”₯17135.7%
❀‍πŸ”₯5611.7%
πŸ₯°347.10%
🍌255.22%
πŸ‘40.835%
πŸ‘Œ10.209%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 479 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTC165 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Isn’t for the vulnerable but is for the seekers πŸ₯°

πŸ”₯3❀2❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ‘1

1 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC176 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Alannasworldx_Alanna_Pow_FansPhoto

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU 🧁

πŸ”₯3❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ₯°1

1 Sept 2026, 06:47 UTC200 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Selfies from August

❀8πŸ”₯5❀‍πŸ”₯1

31 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC136 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @FernandaMotaOnly_Fernanda_MotaPhoto

πŸ’¦ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS πŸ‘

πŸ”₯3❀2

30 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @Eden_Ixora_EdenaprincesaVideo

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU 🧁

❀2

29 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC63 views4 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @Caryn_Beaumont_CarynbeaumontFansVideo

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU 🧁

❀2❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ”₯1

29 Aug 2026, 03:51 UTC170 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Much better

❀4πŸ”₯2❀‍πŸ”₯1

29 Aug 2026, 03:51 UTC176 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

A symptom of living is mental health decline πŸ˜…πŸ™„πŸ˜‚

❀5πŸ”₯2❀‍πŸ”₯1

28 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC81 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Dahyana_Gaitan_Dahyn11Video

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU 🧁

❀2❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ”₯1

27 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC116 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Eliza_Rose_Watson_FansPhoto

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU πŸ’¦

πŸ”₯4❀‍πŸ”₯1

26 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC76 views6 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @Adrianna_Eves_adriannaevesfansVideo

πŸ‘‰ BEST GIRLS JUST FOR YOU 🧁

❀3❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ”₯1πŸ₯°1

25 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC88 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @Charlotte19y_Charlotte19yFansVideo

Charlotte19y

❀3πŸ”₯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Kenzie_Anne_misskenzieannefans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Alannasworldx ❀️‍πŸ”₯ Alanna Pow
@Alannasworldx_Alanna_Pow_Fans Β· 4,305
2 posts
Adrianna Eves 🏝
@Adrianna_Eves_adriannaevesfans Β· 5,252
1 post
Alaine Cheeks
@Alaine_Cheeks_alainecheeks Β· 4,497
1 post
Alternative69 πŸŽ€
@Alternative69_alternative0 Β· 4,986
1 post
Auhneesh Nicole πŸ“ Anij Nicole
@Auhneesh_Nicole_Anij_Nicole_Fans Β· 22,767
1 post
Bella Rama 😈
@Bella_Rama_bellaramatv Β· 4,644
1 post
Caroline Zalog 🧚🏼
@Caroline_Zalog_CarolineZalogFan Β· 8,902
1 post
Caryn Beaumont 🍯 Carynbeaumont
@Caryn_Beaumont_CarynbeaumontFans Β· 5,156
1 post
Charlotte19y 🌸 Misscharlotte1
@Charlotte19y_Charlotte19yFans Β· 4,078
1 post
Dahyana Gaitan πŸ‘ Dahyn11
@Dahyana_Gaitan_Dahyn11 Β· 4,344
1 post
Eden Ixora ❀️‍πŸ”₯ Edenaprincesa
@Eden_Ixora_Edenaprincesa Β· 3,137
1 post
Eliza Rose Watson πŸ§˜β€β™€οΈ
@Eliza_Rose_Watson_Fans Β· 14,753
1 post
Elyylabella πŸ’Ž Ely La Bella
@Elyylabella_Ely_La_Bella Β· 5,201
1 post
Emily Rinaudo πŸ‘ Emjayplays
@Emily_Rinaudo_Emjayplays_Emily Β· 15,024
1 post
Fernanda Mota Farhat πŸ“
@FernandaMotaOnly_Fernanda_Mota Β· 39,932
1 post
Hanna Miller πŸ“ Daniela Gil
@Hanna_Miller_Daniela_Gil_Fans Β· 17,639
1 post
Hope Heaven
@Hope_Heaven_thehopeheaven Β· 4,178
1 post
Isa Bella πŸ”₯ Hulkandisa
@Isa_Bella_Hulkandisa_IsaBellaFan Β· 4,148
1 post
Jezzi.xo πŸ“ Babyjey πŸ“ Jessi Hiji
@Jezzixo_Jessi_Hiji_Jezzi_xo Β· 13,787
1 post
Lilwaifulia 🌹 Liawaifuu
@Lilwaifulia_Liawaifuu Β· 4,858
1 post
Skylar Rae πŸ’œ Lacy Lotus
@Skylar_Rae_skylarxraee Β· 4,140
1 post
Solyluna24 πŸ’¦ Melissa Herrera
@Solyluna24_Melissa_Herrera Β· 4,654
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œKenzie Anne πŸ’–β€ (@Kenzie_Anne_misskenzieannefans), 13,758 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kenzie_Anne_misskenzieannefans.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.