Channel
@KateMason1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,086subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001600673324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KateMason1 |
| Created | 15 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KateMason1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 1,086 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:40 | 1,087 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 1,087 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 20 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
467 reactions across 16 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 116 | 24.8% | |
| 👍 | 97 | 20.8% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 12.4% | |
| 🤯 | 50 | 10.7% | |
| 😡 | 41 | 8.78% | |
| 😱 | 25 | 5.35% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 3.43% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 3.43% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 1.93% | |
| 😈 | 7 | 1.50% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 1.28% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 1.28% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 0.857% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.857% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.642% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.428% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.428% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.214% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.214% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.214% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.428% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 467reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 11 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
For those who are aware that the Mayor of the Blue Mountains publicly took issue with the Vaxxed Bus coming to the Blue Mountains, Warren Ross has done a wonderful job of unpacking the spiteful man's agenda. The Vaxxed Bus gives people the opportunity to document their experiences of vaccines. Begging the question, whose agenda does it fulfill to silence and shame people with vaccine injuries? The Mayor is the epitom…
❤50👍12🥰4🖕1😁1
Tony Blair and Larry Ellison (Oracle software) discussing all our data stored in one place (including genomics), individualised mRNA injections (transfection technology), full surveillance on ALL farms, farms being told what seeds to plant (genetically engineered- “synthetic is sustainable”), biometric data needed to access services and AI government. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FG2AtiInwKM
😡26👎4💩4🤯4👍3🤡3😈2❤1
FSANZ - Australia and NZ food body are about to flood the market with GMOs without safety testing or LABELLING. This will lead to 94 percent of GMOs being "disappeared". FSANZ has a "stakeholder" consultation open until tomorrow, to determine how satisfied stakeholders are with FSANZs processes. FSANZs priorities are to industry, as clearly evidenced by their first stakeholder question not even including consumers of…
🤬12🤯12👍3❤1😁1
https://kate739.substack.com/p/regenerative-agriculture-is-being
👍13🔥1🤔1😁1
I'm finishing up a video explaining how the big ag and chemical companies are using regenerative agriculture as a cover for synthetic biology, nanotech and Internet of Things technologies to be rolled out on all farms. It is all touted as more "sustainable"- which is of massive concern as the Australian government is busy rolling out initiatves and legislation to force farmers to move to "sustainable" agricultural pr…
👍18🔥8🤬4🤯4❤2👀1😁1
If you are in the Sunshine Coast and concerned about the 4th Industrial Revolution technologies, this event on the 4th of December would be worth going to. https://invest.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au/toolkit/geospatial-intelligence-in-real-life/?
👍6🔥2🤣1
You can see where your country is up to with deregulating gene technologies. Australia is not quite up to date- last time the website was updated was May 2024, and we have had a number of changes since then. https://crispr-gene-editing-regs-tracker.geneticliteracyproject.org
😡11🤯4🤬3👍2😁1🙈1
In 2004, whilst I was still sleeping, public concerns about Nano Tech were being discussed in Australia. Nano Tech will be used extensively (if it's not already) in soil and plants to "solve" climate change. There are SERIOUS health and environmental concerns. https://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/2004/1257304.htm?
👍14🤬4😱4🔥3😁1
Please listen to clips regarding the changes to the Gene Technology Act 2000, where dystopian plans to synthetically alter agriculture, wild species and the eco system are outlined. As well as how the Act needs to be amended to make it easier for industry to "innovate". In these two minutes you will get a good sense of where this is all heading, under the guise of climate. And there's a weird statement- that "human b…
😱10🤬8👍3🤡2🤨1🤯1😁1
Canada's Pandemic Preparedness Bill allows for "biosecurity threat" measures which shut down agriculture and push synthetic alternative proteins. In 2022 the WHO, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO- who has a partnership with CropLife to transform the world's food systems), UNEP, and the World Organisation for Animal Health signed an MOU focusing on the One Health Model and biosecurity threats. Can…
😱9🤬6👍5❤1🤡1😁1
MIT "Sculpting evolution" through genetic editing (CRISPR). Nature is just so difficult, not easily controlled and unpredictable. Hence the need to genetically engineer the ecosystem and wild animals. https://www.sculptingevolution.org Video from MIT Media Lab "Sculpting Evolution" Kevin Esvelt: Pandemics, Gene Drives, Existential Threats- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g89D1LFYoKU An analysis of the above video f…
🤯10👍3😢3😁1
The Covid19 Response Inquiry report has been released- 877 pages. Will take a while to look through it, a quick glance it is about the establishment of an Australian Centre for Disease Control, One Health, Surveillance, integrated responses, readiness to move to onine learning for school children, disease data integration system, sewerage surveillance, a "covid catch up strategy, in response to a decline in the deli…
🤬32🤮4👍3🤯3😁2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @KateMason1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 326,321 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kate Mason” (@KateMason1), 1,086 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KateMason1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.