Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Книгоголик с котом

@KatCarroRead

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,238subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002353391306
TypeChannel
Username@KatCarroRead
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KatCarroRead

Growth

1,1691,2381,203.56 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,223 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,237 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,238 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,159–1,248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:391,238+1
10 Aug 2026, 09:471,237+14
6 Aug 2026, 23:331,223+54
6 Aug 2026, 08:511,169no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:221,169first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.59%
avg views ÷ 1,238 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
33.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (1 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,068
Reactions total356
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC≈49 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сначала я подумала, что мне показалось, но потом присмотрелась.., присмотрелась… И.. WTF??? Что за дичь? Что дальше, Макгонагалл и Поттер или может Рон? #чтозачертовщина@KatCarroRead

5 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈192 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟— дарим бокс с книгами наполнением на 2500 рублей условия: подписаться на наши каналы: 🌟girl | анастасия | катерина | валерия | настя | анна | нина 🌟ткнуть кнопку ‘я в деле!’ все итоги в этом чате✨ итоги: 15 августа

5 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈110 views67 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🙃Я дослушала на Яндексе в аудио «Очень плохие вдовы», пришлось даже ускорить его, потому что начитка очень медленная, чтобы передать возраст героинь. Очень предсказуемый легкий сюжет без глубокого смысла. 🧷🧷А вот с «Маленькими женщинами» Олкотт мне первые 2 главы было неимоверно скучно. Как мне и говорили, книга очень похожа на сборник нотаций для благородных девиц. В аудио так вообще не могу её долго

4 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC≈120 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @izdatelstvoastVideo

💡 Вышел трейлер нового сериала «Кэрри» по хоррору Стивена Кинга Стриминговый сервис Prime Video представил трейлер сериала «Кэрри» по мотивам книги Стивена Кинга. Все восемь эпизодов выйдут 7 октября. Новая версия истории станет современным переосмыслением романа. В центре сюжета — школьница Кэрри Уайт, которая всю жизнь провела в изоляции под строгим контролем властной матери. После внезапной смерти отца девушке п

2 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈108 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📖Книги, с которых вы начали этот месяц ☺️ Очень часто в последнее время мне попадается «Волк без присмотра», даже тут дважды. P.S. Еще 2 книги вынесу в комментарии 📚📚📚📚

1 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC≈218 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🫶🫶 🤪 🏢🕵️👻 🔅🔅Диана Сеттерфилд 🔅 @azbookaknigogoliki 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Аннотация 464 страницы 🔘Семейная сага 🔘Мрачные секреты 🔘Феномен близнецов 🔘Исцеляющая сила литературы 🔘Экранизированная книга (2013г) «Тайны невозможно хранить в доме, где есть дети». «Умирая, люди исчезают. Исчезают их голос, их смех, теплота их дыхания. Исчезает их плоть, а в конечном счете и кости. Исчезает и память об этих людях. Эт

1 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈116 views56 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🏧🏧😀🏧🏧 🏧😀 😀😄😁🏧🏧🏧 Обожаю этот месяц! Вкратце мои планы на август - не сдохнуть успеть всё! 👣Нужно допроходить с Броней комиссию в детский сад, с сентября надеюсь пойдем🤞 🔻В этом месяце у меня и 3 моих подруг дни рождения! Нам очень повезло встретиться и подружиться, потому что родились все в разных городах. 🔻Вторая половина месяца будет очень насыщенной. Мой ДР 24 августа, запланировала кое-что на канале к этому дню

1 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC≈87 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✏️ ✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ ✏️✏️✏️🔖🔖🔖 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ✨Я дочитала вчера «Тринадцатую сказку», и даже отзыв написала, но пост вышел бы слишком поздно, поэтому решила на сегодня все перенести. ✨Начала читать «Маленькие женщины», составила себе небольшую памятку, чтобы не путаться в сестрах. ✨А вечером пошла по делам и неожиданно для себя включила в аудио «Очень плохие вдовы» Сью Хинсенбергс. Остроумная история с черным юморо

1 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC≈68 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rugram_mePhoto

НЕ АБЫ ЧТО, А РОЗЫГРЫШ! RUGRAM х ПАЛЬМИРА х НОВИНКИ Сегодня мы хотим разыграть 3 новинки, которые только-только пришли с типографии. ЧТО В МЕШКЕ, КРОМЕ КОТА? • Исповедь. О жизни. Лев Толстой (все читали «Исповедь» – теперь пора перейти и к «О жизни»). • Расскажу – не поверят. Борис Рогинский (во-первых, классная обложка; а во-вторых, здесь интересная концепция: автор возвращается к книгам своего детства, вспомин

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @KatCarroRead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 280,072 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Книгоголик с котом” (@KatCarroRead), 1,238 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KatCarroRead.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.