Channel
@KarMaryyyy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
173subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001661445776 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KarMaryyyy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KarMaryyyy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 173 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 174 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 174 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (17 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,778 |
| Reactions total | 305 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
305 reactions across 13 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5409265315060129916 | 66 | 21.6% | |
| 🤣 | 34 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5373310043586310463 | 32 | 10.5% | |
| 😁 | 30 | 9.84% | |
| custom 5352538099979134593 | 22 | 7.21% | |
| custom 5215552703643535277 | 18 | 5.90% | |
| custom 5244673458083734407 | 15 | 4.92% | |
| custom 5204423979523155443 | 14 | 4.59% | |
| custom 5256053622474553432 | 13 | 4.26% | |
| custom 5292105526417564718 | 9 | 2.95% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 2.95% | |
| custom 5192728684791866521 | 7 | 2.30% | |
| custom 5460740725735955037 | 7 | 2.30% | |
| custom 5210991938001446022 | 5 | 1.64% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 1.64% | |
| custom 5235757737337441585 | 4 | 1.31% | |
| custom 5406963736575491112 | 4 | 1.31% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.984% | |
| custom 5409199125319133541 | 2 | 0.656% | |
| custom 5774107397987504626 | 2 | 0.656% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 1.31% |
Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По ощущениям температура на улице примерно такая, только еще и некрасиво. Вот такая вот хуйня, собачка…🥺🥺
custom 537331004358631046310🤣4custom 52357577373374415854💯1custom 52016652833741967371
Ну вот не говнюк? Из-за того что пекло на улице, этот бедолага пытается испарять жидкость из организма всеми бесплатными способами. И СОПЛЯМИ В ТОМ ЧИСЛЕ! Так вот На фото прям видно траекторию надругательства над новыми фивалетовыми леггинсами. 😒 Плювается соплями. Сабака. Скатина. #животные
😁12🤣8custom 52109919380014460225
Вдруг кому поможет 😒
custom 51927286847918665217custom 54092653150601299163custom 53733100435863104632
Так Я с каким то открытием, меня ебейше придавило так, что я в маске на глазах по стенам ходила когда надо было перемещаться. Охереть. Как будто гвоздь в висок запхали, но через глаз. Так вот получилось каким-то образом достаточно быстро купировать это говно. 100 мг суматриптана Лайфхак номер раз: Картошка фри с кака-колой Лай лайфхак номер два: Подержать ноги в тазу с горячей водой Не знаю что из этого сработало…
custom 52155527036435352776custom 53733100435863104633custom 54092653150601299161
С днем мигрени
custom 52155527036435352773
Девачьки, хочу теперь такую, ток полноразмерную 💅
custom 524467345808373440710custom 53733100435863104636custom 54091991253191335412custom 54607407257359550372custom 57741073979875046262
А кого-то реально это мотивирует? Я все смеялась в шуток про то что люди в любой непонятной ситуации ближе к полуночи отдают дань сове, и что она занимается буллингом. Но она реально преследует, и постоянно спрашивает разрешение запрещать мне пользоваться приложениями пока я не сделаю урок 😑 Закиньте в комменты мемы с совой этой, если есть )
🤣15custom 52446734580837344075custom 52921055264175647185😁2😈1custom 54607407257359550371
Да это вообще что такое? Посмотрите какую красотищу нарисовала https://t.me/Ghoti_sunset Очень трогает, что она так меня увидела и нарисовала 💜 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 Я с таким восторгом залипала на мухоморы, что кажется я только спустя 3 минуты разглядываний увидела жабку в углу 😁🤩
custom 540926531506012991623custom 535253809997913459317custom 525605362247455343213custom 52044239795231554434
Это пипец. Я случайно снесла пост с рисунком и не знаю как его восстановить, так что придется его перезалить..😐 Если кто-то знает как это сделать напишите мне пожалуйста. Почему-то прям вынесло с этого. Очень жаль, что и реакции снеслись и просмотры, а именно на этом посте мне было важно, что их было достаточно много для моего канала. Это хоть и в малой степени , но показывало, что отклик на творчество Кати есть и ч…
custom 52155527036435352779😢5🤯3
Я сегодня работала весь день и как полоумная всем показывала этот рисунок. Я показала всем коллегам, всем своим клиентам, всем чужим клиентам. Да и вообще не могу выразить как мне нравится 💜 Девочка которая нарисовала его очень юна, но безумно талантлива. Хочется держать кулачки за неё и смотреть как взрослее её талант будет приумножаться. Это не первый рисунок который она мне дарит, но первый рисунок существующий …
custom 540926531506012991620custom 537331004358631046311custom 520442397952315544310
Сматрити , мы лэйди 💅
custom 540926531506012991619custom 53525380999791345935custom 54069637365754911124🥰1custom 54632947666932274921
#мемы
😁9🤣7custom 52921055264175647184
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @KarMaryyyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 218,485 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐊𝐀𝐑𝐌𝐀𝐍” (@KarMaryyyy), 173 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KarMaryyyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.