Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Капралов Александр | Онлайн тренер по фитнесу

Channel

Капралов Александр | Онлайн тренер по фитнесу

@Kapralovlive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,310subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001282267408
TypeChannel
Username@Kapralovlive
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kapralovlive

Growth

4,3104,3304,3207 August 2026 — 4,330 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,330 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,325 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,319 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,314 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,310 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,307–4,333 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:344,310-4
14 Aug 2026, 17:574,314-5
11 Aug 2026, 07:414,319-6
8 Aug 2026, 05:234,325-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:034,330no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:494,330first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 4,310 subscribers
Avg views / post
445
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (22 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total5,785
Reactions total214
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 58s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

214 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6329.4%
👍5827.1%
3817.8%
💯188.41%
❤‍🔥104.67%
😁62.80%
🤣62.80%
52.34%
🤗52.34%
🤯41.87%
😱10.467%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC64 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁5

7 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC230 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я тут напиздел на психологов и в комментах под постом выше мы это с вами обсудили. Но сейчас хотел бы чуть по другому на это взглянуть. Причем не навязывая вам мое мнение и мировозрение, а просто показав то, что люди мне пишут. Я спецом пособирал немного отзывов, прошерстил переписки, чтобы выцепить то, где человек САМ мне решил написать о том, как тренировки повлияли на порядок в голове. ОТЗЫВЫ (скрины) Я ПРИКРЕПИ

👍9🔥42

29 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC514 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А про психологов, я не понимаю зачем они нужны, если честно. Да, да не говорите мне про терапию, что это полезно, что сильные тоже плачут и что сильный это тот, кто не боится сказать, что ему нужна помощь. Мне похуй, окей? Я все равно не понимаю ее прикола для 90% случаев, где очевидно почему человеку хуево, просто он себе признаться в этом не может. Одно дело разбираться с чувствами, которые сложно контролировать и

👍16💯4🤣41

29 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC473 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Неопределенность сейчас у всех или это СМИ разгоняют так? Комменты пишите блеать!!! Надо общаться)

💯7👍21😁1😱1

29 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC473 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Вы в психологию верите вообще?

  1. Да77%
  2. Нет, хуйня полная23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC635 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С детства любил космос и все что с ним связанно и вот какая мысль мне взрывает мозг: -"На дистанции до Луны (~384 000 км) отклонение в 0,001° даёт смещение около 6,7 км. То есть целился в конкретную точку, а промахнулся на почти семь километров — при таком крошечном угле." Проводим аналогию: 0,001градус это мои 3-4 зарядки в неделю (мини-тренировки по 20-30минут), которые на длительной дистанции делают меня другим

15🔥11👍6🤯3

23 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC569 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

За каждым из этих результатов стоит одна простая вещь: грамотно построенная система, которая подстроена под человека и адаптируется к его условиям и состоянию, а не ломает его через колено. Если вам близок такой подход - давайте уже работать. ➡️ Пишите мне в личку кодовое слово СИЛА: https://t.me/KapralovClub Разберём вашу текущую форму, график, ограничения и подберём тот формат, который даст результат именно вам.

5❤‍🔥3🤗3

23 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC556 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И отдельным постом хочу показать сообщение от участника закрытого клуба «Место Силы» (занимается с прошлого октября). Знакомьтесь, Евгений. Он прислал не просто отзыв, а подробнейшую, глубочайшую рефлексию человека, который проживает свой путь в зале от и до. Человек зафиксировал всю динамику: от веса на штанге в каждом упражнении до секунд в контрастном душе. Посчитал проходки, отследил своё дыхание в горах Дагест

👍8❤‍🔥75🤗1

23 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC440 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Включите звук и просто прочувствуйте атмосферу. ❤️‍🔥 Иван. 38(!!!) повторений с весом 25 кг на спине! ❤️‍🔥 Сергей. 24 раза с весом 20 кг... и делает он это в самом КОНЦЕ тренировки, когда силы уже на исходе. ❤️‍🔥 Юлия. Плотное комбо: 6 раз с весом +10 кг и сразу 12 раз без веса. И знаете, что самое крутое? Для них это уже обычная рутина. Они просто сдают мне отчёт за отчётом, тренируются и даже не замечают, наскол

🔥10👍53

23 Jul 2026, 11:18 UTC492 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

А вот Вячеслав. Становая тяга с гантелями. Каждая - 40кг. Его планомерную работу вы уже могли видеть на канале здесь: https://t.me/Kapralovlive/2065 https://t.me/Kapralovlive/2424 https://t.me/Kapralovlive/2492 Посмотрите на видео - сухая, плотная, отличная форма. Но меня больше зацепила его фраза в отчёте: «Сам к таким результатам я никогда не пришёл бы». И это важнейшая штука, про которую я часто говорю. Наш мо

👍9🔥7💯2

23 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC415 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрите на фото. Это Анастасия. Ранее я многократно показывал, как она пашет: https://t.me/Kapralovlive/1630 https://t.me/Kapralovlive/1957 https://t.me/Kapralovlive/2103 И вот на днях она присылает мне этот коллаж. В 27 лет - отличная, подтянутая форма. За кадром - один ребёнок, со спортом "на вы", о гирях и дорожках даже мысли не было. Дальше жизнь идёт своим чередом: в 36 - второй ребёнок, потом тяжелейшая т

🔥103👍2🤗1🤯1

23 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC398 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В продолжение нашего разговора про правильный подход к тренировкам, выносливость и работу без самоистязания. Теория - это одно, но всегда интереснее посмотреть, как всё это выглядит в реальной жизни. Собрал несколько свежих примеров и из личного ведения, и из закрытого клуба «Место Силы». Погнали. ↘️

🔥52

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Kapralovlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTCAnonymous Poll77 voters

Вы в психологию верите вообще?

  1. Да77%
  2. Нет, хуйня полная23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,261,740 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Капралов Александр | Онлайн тренер по фитнесу” (@Kapralovlive), 4,310 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kapralovlive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.