Channel
@KanzakiVS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
313subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001644532789 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KanzakiVS |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KanzakiVS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 313 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 315 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 315 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,000 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 402 | 40.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 136 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 106 | 10.6% | |
| 😭 | 87 | 8.70% | |
| 🥰 | 65 | 6.50% | |
| 💔 | 41 | 4.10% | |
| 🦄 | 32 | 3.20% | |
| 😁 | 31 | 3.10% | |
| 🍾 | 25 | 2.50% | |
| custom 6325573798565250512 | 19 | 1.90% | |
| 🫡 | 13 | 1.30% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 1.00% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 1.00% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 0.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 0.5% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.3% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.2% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.2% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.2% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.1% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,000reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итак, еще один не самый лёгкий заканчивается. 🎊 Простите, что бросила вас (да и рисование в целом) на такое долгое время. За последние пол года я развелась, переехала в Мурино (реально самое отвратное для жизни городское поселение, как оказалось), съездила в Армению к брату (впервые в жизни поднялась там на 3200км над уровнем моря ✨✨✨), похоронила Амана. Очень скучаю по Екатеринбургу, по своему коту, которого пришлос…
🥰41💘10❤8
PIP наша булочка 🪦
💔27🫡13🦄2🤯1
Нового я вам ничего не нарисовала, но предлагаю вспомнить старое по этой обнове ⭐️⭐️⭐️
❤66🥰13🤩6❤🔥4
Кому интересно, залила видос с окончанием квеста вот сюда: https://youtu.be/UnF_qtStL58?si=qKyKdy1ITmvp6BCK Моих криков чайки там не слышно, но они были) 👀👀👀
❤19🤩2😁1
Итак, я выползла на свет ради вчерашней обновы в Лосте. Основной сюжет я вам спойлерить не буду (да там и спойлерить то нечего), но мимо фиолетового квеста, конечно, не пройду. Этот маленький квест я могу описать так: Сценарист1: сколько нам нужно намёков на то, что мы шипперим Амана и Искателя? Сценарист2: ДА!
❤31❤🔥7👍5
Зацените кто наконец приехал! 🦚 Все, что на фоне приехало вместе с ним)
🔥39❤🔥10❤6🦄4
Товарищи лучники! Вставайте, открывайте шампанское, зовите родню, друзей, целуйте своих котов, танцуйте на столе!! Нам больше не придется уходить за чаем на кухню, пока заряжается снайперский выстрел, чтобы хоть как-то скоротать время) (но это не точно)
🍾24❤5😁5❤🔥3🦄1
Заканчиваю сейчас арт для Russian horror Zine и мне очень нравится то, что получается) Если что, инфа по зину вот тут: https://vk.com/im/convo/2000000140?entrypoint=list_all&w=wall-182602348_40113 Прошлый у нас получился прям огонь, а тут еще и моя любимая тематика современных хорроров в родном сеттинге 👏
❤34🦄4🍾1
— Этот искатель — хороший малый. Присмотри за ним там, в мире живых. — Лютеран еле заметно улыбнулся. — Как думаешь, Кадан, мы сделали все, что могли? — Ты сделал всё, что мог. И даже больше. Последние слова Кадана прозвучали в пустоту. Он откинулся на тёмную холодную дверь за его спиной и тяжело вздохнул, прикрыв глаза. Над ним проносился поток из тысяч бессмертных душ, но одна, самая яркая, только что погасла навсе…
😭52💔14❤11❤🔥10🦄1
А еще — делимся невероятными форзацами для «Красного и черного» в Young Adult оформлении от YunashkeArt 💘 💌Предзаказ: МИФ/ Читай-город #мифпроза_вечныеистории #мифпроза_книги
❤29🔥5🥰4🦄1
Товарищи землекопы (или может каменщики)! Какой романтик арт хотите от меня? 👀
The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🦄3❤1
Спойлер: там хуй Зато какой! 👀 👀👀👀👀👀
❤🔥52custom 632557379856525051215🔥11❤2🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @KanzakiVS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Товарищи землекопы (или может каменщики)! Какой романтик арт хотите от меня? 👀
The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2025 to 31 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,184,278 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kanzaki_VS✨” (@KanzakiVS), 313 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KanzakiVS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.