3 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 294–295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 07:55
294
-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:02
295
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:56
295
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
122 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
45
36.9%
👍
28
23.0%
❤🔥
19
15.6%
🔥
14
11.5%
🤣
6
4.92%
🥰
5
4.10%
👌
2
1.64%
🤔
2
1.64%
👏
1
0.82%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2024 to 19 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, мой канал переезжает в max !
https://max.ru/join/3jYFxPUnaJ7-k70dspLUC6CKzl8KAZT28MXvHCq5LHU
Присоединяйтесь, развивайтесь и получайте удовольствие от учебного процесса 🙌
Еще больше интересного контента и познавательных викторин уже ждут вас в моем канале.
See you there 👩🏾🏫
👨🎓 Если вы хотите о чем-то попросить, недостаточно добавить слово Please к
фразе «Дайте мне», «Принесите мне» или «Я хочу». Пример – обращение к
официанту в кафе. Вы общаетесь с официантом и хотите заказать воду. Что
обычно скажет русскоязычный, «перекинув» привычные ему русские фразы в
английские версии слов?
“Give me water” или “Bring me water” или “I want water” – все
подобные варианты невежливы. …
GOOD MORNING 🌅
Очень часто на занятиях я замечаю ,как ученики теряются при банальных приветствующих фразах.
Решила потихоньку привносить в вашу речь разнообразие 🤓
Well!
Как ещё можно пожелать ДОБРОГО УТРА на Английском?
Rise and shine!
Подъём! Проснись и пой!
Wakey wakey! Пора вставать! Подъём
Wakey wakey, sleepyhead! Подъём, соня!
Wakey wakey eggs and bakey!
Просыпайся! Пора завтракать. (При это завтрака …
ПОЧЕМУ АНГЛИЧАНЕ ПЬЮТ ЧАЙ С МОЛОКОМ?
Английское чаепитие у многих ассоциируется с красивыми чайными церемониями, фарфоровыми чашками, интересными традициями. Одна из таких традиций - добавление молока в чай.
Существует несколько версий, почему англичане начали это делать.
1️⃣Некоторые предполагают, что молоко бережет тонкий фарфор от желтого налета и трещин. Представители британской знати любили дорогие сервизы. Ч…
Есть те, кто не любит сплетничать? Даже наукой доказано, что это полезно 😱
Несколько вариантов, как об этом сказать на английском:
🦻TO GOSSIP — самое нейтральное «сплетничать»
🦻TO TITTLE-TATTLE [ˈtɪt.əlˌtæt.əl] — распространять слухи
🦻TO SPREAD RUMOURS — тоже «распространять слухи»
🦻TO SPILL THE TEA — разболтать сплетню, сплетничать
Не нам судить ,но мы обсудим 😌
Перевод снизу 👇
Help! My cat is stuck up a tree! - Помогите! Мой кот застрял на дереве! 😂
🤣5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KamaEasyEng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2024 to 19 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KamaEasyEnglish” (@KamaEasyEng), 294 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KamaEasyEng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.