3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,518–1,525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 03:21
1,519
-4
7 Aug 2026, 20:08
1,523
-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:16
1,524
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 1,519 subscribers
Avg views / post
313
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held
20 (1 May 2026 – 24 July 2026)
Views total
313
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 40s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
120 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
94
78.3%
⚡
7
5.83%
🔥
7
5.83%
❤
5
4.17%
💯
5
4.17%
❤🔥
1
0.833%
😇
1
0.833%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KallePakulla. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 May 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Das Video sagt es eigentlich schon:
Ein echter Bitcoiner wird man erst, wenn man Höhen und Tiefen erlebt hat.
Aus meiner Erfahrung kann ich sagen: „Study Bitcoin“ lohnt sich.
Erst dann begreift man den wirklichen Wert – und warum selbst fallende Kurse das Herz ❤️ eines Bitcoiners höher schlagen lassen können.
Wer den Mehrwert erkannt hat, weiß, warum man durchhält. Bitcoin ist einmalig und langfristig ein Probleml…
Ich habe heute wieder Bitcoin gekauft. Wie jeden Montag.
Nicht weil er gerade günstig ist, sondern weil er begrenzt ist.
Es wird niemals mehr als 21 Millionen Bitcoin geben. Aktuell sind knapp 20 Millionen im Umlauf. Die allerletzten werden erst im Jahr 2140 geschürft.
Stell dir mal vor: Jeder der weltweit ca. 57,5 Millionen Millionäre und Milliardäre würde sich nur einen ganzen Bitcoin sichern wollen. Es wäre nic…
🔥 ICH HABE gerade heute bewusst (zusätzlich) #BITCOIN gekauft!
Warum genau heute?
Weil heute (01.07.2026) die MiCA-Übergangsfrist endet. Ab sofort dürfen nur noch richtig lizenzierte CASPs Krypto-Dienste in der EU anbieten. Viele Plattformen ohne Lizenz müssen den Service für EU-User stark einschränken oder einstellen.
Man kann das für Bitcoin als ein klares bullishes Signal sehen:
• Endlich regulatorische Klarhei…
ICH habe heute BITCOIN gekauft 🫵 DU auch?
Warum? BITCOIN ist im Angebot: Guckt euch das Video an - ein Grund zum Nachdenken!
Meine Meinung: Mit KONTINUIERLICHEN sparen 🐷 bleibt man dran und freut sich über Angebote :-)
#StudyBitcoin
Da es viele nicht wissen:
Ja, man kann schon mit 10 € mitmachen.
1 Bitcoin entspricht 100.000.000 Satoshi (Sat), so wie 1 € 100 Cent hat.
Beachtet aber unbedingt: Kauft BITCOIN nur b…
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
Auch der 11.06.2026 ist ein guter Tag, um Bitcoin zu kaufen 😍
#StudyBitcoin
Da es viele nicht wissen:
Ja, man kann schon mit 10 € mitmachen.
1 Bitcoin entspricht 100.000.000 Satoshi (Sat), so wie 1 € 100 Cent hat.
Beachtet aber unbedingt: Kauft BITCOIN nur bei seriösen Anbietern, NIEMALS auf übliche Börsen, die sie nicht auszahlen - und lasst die BITCOIN NIE! auf Börsen liegen, verwahrt sie selbst -…
⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
Nur mal zur Erinnerung, da es nicht jedem immer klar ist !
#StudyBitcoin
Da es viele nicht wissen:
Ja, man kann schon mit 10 € mitmachen.
1 Bitcoin entspricht 100.000.000 Satoshi (Sat), so wie 1 € 100 Cent hat.
Beachtet aber unbedingt: Kauft BITCOIN nur bei seriösen Anbietern, NIEMALS auf übliche Börsen, die sie nicht auszahlen - und lasst die BITCOIN NIE! auf Börsen liegen, verwahrt sie selbst - und …
ICH HABE HEUTE (wie jeden Montag) #BITCOIN gekauft, DU 🫵 auch?
Wie könnte die Woche schöner starten als mit frischen BITCOIN? 🤩 Vor allem, weil es gerade mehr Bitcoin für Fiat (€,$) gibt 🤩😍
BITCOINER freuen sich deshalb also auch, wenn der Kurs fällt. Soweit sie eben - wie echte BITCOINER - regelmäßig Bitcoin akkumulieren.
Guckt euch diese Entwicklung an ( Montag (Stand 08. Juni 2026):
Wenn du jeden Montag in den …
Ist das Geld der Anleger in Gefahr?
Das Handelsblatt berichtet, dass die TGI AG (Trust Gold International) aus Vaduz (Liechtenstein) durch die Finanzmarktaufsicht Liechtenstein (FMA) mit Verfügung vom 26. Mai 2026 der Vertrieb ihrer Goldrabatt-Modelle untersagt wurde.
FMA Begründung: TGI betreibt damit ein unerlaubtes Einlagengeschäft. Zusätzlich müssen die entgegengenommenen Gelder innerhalb von 4 Monaten zurückge…
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
Schaut euch das Video/ den Post im Link (hier oben ☝️) bitte an!
⚠️ AUS GEGEBENEN ANLASS ⚠️
Ich weise nochmals darauf hin:
DER KANAL hier ist ein
‼️ kostenloses BILDUNGSANGEBOT ‼️
Ich verfolge hier keinerlei finanzielle INTERESSEN ‼️Es ist alles im verlinkten Beitrag erklärt!
Insbesondere neue Kanalmitglieder: Guckt ihn euch an!
BG @KallePakulla
Thema: #STUDYBITCOIN
Artikel: Außergewöhnlich koordinierter Vorfall auf der BTC- Blockchain - Zeitreisende am Werk?
Gestern sind 107 BTC an die berühmte Burn-Adresse 1111111111111111111114oLvT2 gegangen. Die Coins stammten aus fünf alten Wallets aus den Jahren 2014/2015 und waren mit einem Timelock auf einen bestimmten Block versehen – also eine bewusst geplante und koordinierte Aktion.
Zum gleichen Zeitpunkt hatt…
Es ist MONTAG ☝️
ICH HABE HEUTE (wie jeden Montag) #BITCOIN gekauft, DU auch? 🫵
Montag (25. Mai 2026):
Wenn du jeden Montag in den letzten 7 Jahren 10 € in Bitcoin getauscht hättest, dann hättest du 3.660 € investiert – und stündest heute mit 0,1759 BTC da. Diese wären aktuell ca. 11.645 € wert 💪
Das entspricht bei einem Sparbuch durchschnittlich ca. 33 % per anno. bei wöchentlicher Einzahlung. ☝️ Wo bekommt man …
An alle, die heute mitfeiern 🥳:
Lasst euch die Pizza schmecken! 🤗🍕
Meine war GROSSARTIG 😍🍕
Never sell your 🫵 #Bitcoin 💪
Keine Beratung, nur Meinung und Info ℹ️
Gefällt dir der Beitrag? 👍 Dann gern weiterleiten 🤗
Euer
@KallePakulla
____________________
Hodl strong 💪 and study👨🎓BITCOIN, since 2️⃣0️⃣1️⃣4️⃣
T-Kanal: https://t.me/KallePakulla
👍5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KallePakulla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 877,925 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KallePakulla” (@KallePakulla), 1,519 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KallePakulla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.