6 measurements spanning 16 days, net -117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,826–8,979 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 18:59
8,844
-25
5 Sept 2026, 08:21
8,869
-23
1 Sept 2026, 21:58
8,892
-27
30 Aug 2026, 04:58
8,919
-32
26 Aug 2026, 22:07
8,951
-10
25 Aug 2026, 22:15
8,961
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 8,844 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.593%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
30 (23 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
39,041
Reactions total
225
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
225 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
128
56.9%
🔥
27
12.0%
💔
26
11.6%
👍
16
7.11%
🏆
13
5.78%
👎
10
4.44%
❤🔥
2
0.889%
👏
2
0.889%
👌
1
0.444%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
AKFI has clarified that Deepak Shankar’s inclusion in the selection process and consideration for the team has not been overlooked, as he has been selected in the standby position for the Asian Games.
The selection process is carried out in accordance with the applicable policy and the overall requirements of the team. 🇮🇳🤼♂️
.
.
.
#DeepakSankar
#Akfi #TeamIndia
#AsianGames2026
#Kabaddi360
The Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India (AKFI) has issued a clarification regarding Karthika’s non-selection for the Asian Games 2026.
According to AKFI, Karthika suffered an injury to her left ankle during practice in Gandhinagar on June 27, just one day before the final selection trials scheduled for June 28.
Due to the injury, Karthika did not participate in the final Asian Games selection trials. Medical and ra…
🇮🇳 Indian Women’s Kabaddi Team Captains at the Asian Games! 🤼♀️🏆
Since 2010, when women’s Kabaddi was introduced at the Asian Games, here are the Team India captains from each edition.
.
.
.
#TeamIndia #indiacaptain
#asiangames #womenskabaddi
#Kabaddi360
🔥 PKL Champions’ Captains in India’s 2026 Asian Games Squad! 🇮🇳🤼♂️
👑 Four PKL-winning captains. One Team India! 🇮🇳
.
.
.
#pklchampions #Captain
#asiangames2026 #prokabaddi
#kabaddi360
🚨 Tamil Nadu Kabaddi Association Supports Its Players! 🇮🇳
After their impressive performances at the Senior Nationals, Karthika R. and Deepak Sankar missed out on India’s Asian Games 2026 squad.
The Tamil Nadu State Kabaddi Federation has officially written to AKFI, questioning the non-selection of both players. 🤼♂️🤼♀️
📢 Strong support from the state federation for its players!
.
.
#tamilnadukabaddi
#asiangames2…
🔥 After a 5–0 clean sweep over Pakistan, Mohammad Reza Shadloui has thrown an open challenge to Team India ahead of the Asian Games 2026! 🇮🇷
👀 India vs Iran — the rivalry is heating up! 🇮🇳🤼♂️🇮🇷
.
.
.
#mohammadrezashadloui
#IndiavsIran
#AsianGames2026
#Kabaddi360
🇮🇷 CLEAN SWEEP! 🔥
Iran 5️⃣–0️⃣ Pakistan 🇵🇰
Iran’s Kabaddi Team won all 5 matches on their Pakistan tour! 🤼♂️🏆
.
.
#irankabaddi
#PakistanvsIran
#Kabaddi360
🔥 4 Wins in 4! 🇮🇷
Iran continues its winning run in the Iran vs Pakistan Kabaddi Series 2026, completing four victories in four matches! 🤼♂️🏆
.
.
.
#PakistanvsIran
#IranKabaddI
#Kabaddi360
🇮🇳 Indian Men’s Kabaddi Team Captains at the Asian Games! 🤼♂️🏆
Since 1990, when men’s Kabaddi was introduced at the Asian Games, here are all the Team India captains across the editions.
.
.
.
#IndiaCaptain
#TeamIndia #asiangames
#kabaddi360
🇮🇳 Indian Women’s Kabaddi Team has had 3 new captains since the 2025 Asian Kabaddi Championship! 👑
.
.
.
#IndiaCaptain #womenskabaddi
#AsianGames2026 #Kabaddi360
🙏 God gives you a second chance, but you have to keep working hard. 💪
🇮🇳 This time, Sunil Kumar is ready to lead India on the biggest stage! 👑🔥
.
.
.
#SunilKumar
#IndiaCaptain
#asiangames2026
#Kabaddi360
❤10❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Kabaddi360_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Newspaper Notes for UPSC CSE @iasips_preparation · 49,142 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 August 2026
UFJ Channel 📚🖋 @UFJChannel · 27,477 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kabaddi360” (@Kabaddi360_official), 8,844 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kabaddi360_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.