Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کاغظ|KAAGHZ

@Kaa_ghz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,156subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001453443330
TypeChannel
Username@Kaa_ghz
Description• We will try our best to be remembered as a #legend in your memories • • ما سعی میکنیم مثل یک #افسانه تو یادتون بمونیم • ارتباط با ادمین : @Mas8586
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kaa_ghz

Growth

9,1569,1719,163.56 August 2026 — 9,171 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,167 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,165 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,156 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,154–9,173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:549,156-9
9 Aug 2026, 18:119,165-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:569,167-4
6 Aug 2026, 07:219,171first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 26 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.31%
avg views ÷ 9,156 subscribers
Avg views / post
761
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (26 April 20258 August 2026)
Views total1,522
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,450
Videos
428
Links
66

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

713 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
41858.6%
👍21430.0%
😢456.31%
🕊212.95%
😁121.68%
👎30.421%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 713reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC482 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

واقعا رمز هر موفقیتی استمراره! میخوای زبان یاد بگیری؟ استمرار. هیکل قشنگ؟ استمرار. ساز جدید؟ استمرار. رزومه ی قوی؟ استمرار... خلاصه که سمج بودن جواب میده. @Kaa_ghz

3👍3

3 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC≈1,040 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

تشکر‌کردن رو یاد بگیرید؛ از نگهبان پارکینگ از راننده اسنپ از شریک عاطفی از دوستی که برات کاری انجام داده از همکاری که کمکت کرده آدم‌ها برده ما نیستند… @Kaa_ghz

👍1711

14 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,970 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

جنوبیای عزیز، عمری سفره‌نشین خوانِ کرَمِ شما بودیم. قلب ما در این شب‌ها برای شما سرمایه‌دارانِ همیشه بی‌نصیب می‌تپه 🫂♥️ @Kaa_ghz

36😢3😁1

14 Feb 2026, 09:46 UTC≈3,890 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

حدود ۱۱۰ میلیارد انسان تا امروز به دنیا آمده‌اند. بیش از ۹۰٪شان حالا زیر خاک‌اند. همه‌شان بعد از خلقت آمدند، نفس کشیدند، جنگیدند، عاشق شدند، خراج و مالیات دادند… و رفتند. هرکدام فکر می‌کردند زمانه‌شان خاص است. ما هم همین‌طور فکر می‌کنیم. تاریخ، قبرستانِ اعتماد به‌نفس بشر است. @Kaa_ghz

28😢4

12 Feb 2026, 14:41 UTC≈3,780 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«رنج‌های ما اگرچه پیرمان کرد، اما از ما کسی را ساخت که هرگز فکر نمی‌کردیم برای آن به دنیا آمده باشیم.» @Kaa_ghz

25

29 Jan 2026, 14:10 UTC≈4,590 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ما كه جوانى نكرديم ! يعنى وقت و حوصله‌اش را نداشتيم ! ما سرمان شلوغ بود، خيلى شلوغ !!! به قدرى فكر و مشغله روىِ سرمان سنگینی مى‌كرد كه درکِ درستى از سن و سال نداشتيم ... ما حتى كودكى هم نكرديم ، چشم باز كرديم و پیر بوديم ... ما قربانيانِ بدترين برهه‌ى تاريخ بوديم ! نسلِ جوانى هایِ بر باد رفته ... نسلِ بحران و بلا تكليفى ... نسلى كه بدونِ فرياد ،در دلِ آتشِ زمانه سوخت ! ما كم سن و سال ترين سالمندانِ تاريخ بوديم

😢1612🕊8👍7

4 Jan 2026, 15:26 UTC≈4,630 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

امیدوارم روزی اگه همه چی درست شد هنوز درونمون شور و ذوقی واسه زندگی کردن مونده باشه ؛) @Kaa_ghz

👍16😢108👎3🕊2

30 Dec 2025, 18:39 UTC≈4,670 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

قبل از اینکه با کسی بحث کنید از خود بپرسید: آیا این شخص از لحاظ ذهنی به اندازه کافی بالغ است تا مفهوم دیدگاه متفاوت را درک کند؟ اگر نه، دلیلی برای بحث نیست تمام @Kaa_ghz

19👍6🕊4

27 Dec 2025, 21:10 UTC≈4,380 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏" بعضی از روابط مثل دندون عقلن " شاید با تموم کردنش یک دفعه درد زیادی رو تحمل کنی اما باید ازش بگذری تا مجبور نباشی مدام یه درد تدریجی رو تحمل کنی... چون این درد تدریجی از درون نابودت میکنه،خوشیاتو، عزت نفس و اعتماد به نفستو ازت میگیره به خاطر چی، به خاطر موندن تو یک رابطه مسموم.. @Kaa_ghz

👍62

26 Oct 2025, 05:37 UTC≈5,900 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

زندگی چیست؟ •داستایفسکی: جهنم است •سقراط: امتحان است •ارسطو: ذهن است •نیچه: قدرت است •فروید: مرگ است •مارکس: ایده است •پیکاسو: هنر است •گاندی: عشق است •شوپنهاور: رنج است •راسل: رقابت است •استیو جابز: ایمان است •اینشتین: دانش است •هاوکینگ: امید است •کافکا: آغاز است @Kaa_ghz

22🕊2

17 Sept 2025, 11:04 UTC≈6,090 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هرچی بزرگتر میشی میفهمی پخته‌ترین و‌ موثرترین راه مجازات برا آدما تنش نیس بلکه تحریم ارتباطی اوناس @Kaa_ghz

21👍19

5 Sept 2025, 23:26 UTC≈7,070 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏خودش شبیه "تراکنش ناموفقه" از ظاهر دیگران ایراد می‌گیره. @Kaa_ghz

17👍11😁11

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Kaa_ghz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 200,621 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کاغظ|KAAGHZ” (@Kaa_ghz), 9,156 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kaa_ghz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.