Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

0xAlpha πŸ’Ž (Channel)

@K_gemhunter_L2

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

1,715subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001883151709
TypeChannel
Username@K_gemhunter_L2
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/K_gemhunter_L2

Growth

1,7151,7171,7167 August 2026 β€” 1,717 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 1,717 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 1,715 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,715–1,717 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:211,715-2
8 Aug 2026, 03:541,717no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:321,717first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
30.5%
avg views Γ· 1,715 subscribers
Avg views / post
523
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.506%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (2 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total6,805
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘1435.9%
🫑820.5%
❀615.4%
πŸ”₯37.69%
πŸ•Š25.13%
πŸ₯°25.13%
🌚12.56%
πŸ†12.56%
πŸ‘€12.56%
πŸ‘Œ12.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC484 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ I believe $HOOKR offers an attractive asymmetric opportunity that's worth taking a small position in. @Hookrfun | $HOOKR is a very new token launchpad live on Robinhood Chain, centered around custom Uniswap v4 hooks. The project is led by experienced developers with a strong track record in DeFi. Below is a basic comparison between the $PUMP and $HOOKR models (Image below). @Hookrfun is an experimental but thoug…

🫑2🌚1πŸ‘Œ1

4 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC712 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ“ˆ July marked a turning point for @crediblefin | $CRED as the project achieved remarkable growth: - Reached $162M in monthly payment volume. - Total cumulative payment volume reached approximately $936M, approaching the $1B milestone. - Expanded its payment network across Asia to Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, with support for currency conversion. - Successfully completed its fundraising round: The targ…

29 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC410 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ I've started taking a close look at @crediblefin|$CRED. https://x.com/Karamata2_2/status/2082405073012031755

29 Jul 2026, 03:58 UTC225 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: Anthropic's Claude Mythos AI discovers new ways to attack cryptographic algorithms, including a post-quantum encryption candidate. @WatcherGuru

πŸ‘2🫑2

21 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC519 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: $66,000 Bitcoin @WatcherGuru

πŸ‘1

20 Jul 2026, 04:41 UTC492 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

US National Debt 2011: $14.79T 2012: $16.06T 2013: $16.73T 2014: $17.82T 2015: $18.15T 2016: $19.57T 2017: $20.24T 2018: $21.51T 2019: $22.71T 2020: $26.94T 2021: $28.43T 2022: $30.93T 2023: $33.17T 2024: $35.46T 2025: $37.64T​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 2026: $39.50T (currently) That's an increase of 167% since 2011 @WatcherGuru

πŸ‘3πŸ‘€1🫑1

17 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC594 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ I've started building a bag of $WRKR around this price range. @wrkrdev is the missing piece for the Robinhood Chain. Why? Robinhood already has a massive distribution advantage: - 28M brokerage accounts - Tokenized stocks - RWA - AI agents - USDG stablecoin But to fully leverage that user base, it needs thousands of applications. That means it needs: - Developers - AI builders - Startups - Solo founders - Team…

πŸ”₯3❀1πŸ‘1

15 Jul 2026, 04:48 UTC563 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ It's crazy how quickly $PONS became the #1 launchpad on Robinhood chain after $NOXA shut down tbh That took, what, a few hours?

πŸ‘1πŸ₯°1🫑1

15 Jul 2026, 04:47 UTC591 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

πŸ“ˆ This is why $NOXA collapsed so quickly. The founder of $NOXA became too greedy by taking all of the platform fees, while another developer controlled the launch contracts and the website https://x.com/ElonTrades/status/2077247574063431973

πŸ‘1

14 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC554 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: $100,000,000 worth of crypto shorts liquidated in the past 60 minutes. @WatcherGuru

πŸ‘1

14 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC512 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

BREAKING: πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US inflation falls to 3.5%, lower than expectations. @WatcherGuru

πŸ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @K_gemhunter_L2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œ0xAlpha πŸ’Ž (Channel)” (@K_gemhunter_L2), 1,715 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/K_gemhunter_L2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.