Everyone use my referral link. This is goated https://t.me/Pickpredictwin_bot?start=referral=ppw2kznwyf
π15π9π2π2β€βπ₯1π1π€1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS

Channel
@KYLE_REVIEW
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
4,008subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001752246307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KYLE_REVIEW |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KYLE_REVIEW |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 4,008 | -24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 4,032 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 4,055 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 4,056 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (31 May 2026 β 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,598 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
482 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 186 | 38.6% | |
| π | 160 | 33.2% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 29 | 6.02% | |
| π | 15 | 3.11% | |
| π | 12 | 2.49% | |
| π | 11 | 2.28% | |
| π’ | 11 | 2.28% | |
| π | 9 | 1.87% | |
| π€ | 8 | 1.66% | |
| π«‘ | 7 | 1.45% | |
| π³ | 5 | 1.04% | |
| π― | 4 | 0.83% | |
| π | 4 | 0.83% | |
| π€― | 4 | 0.83% | |
| β‘ | 3 | 0.622% | |
| π» | 3 | 0.622% | |
| π€£ | 3 | 0.622% | |
| π | 2 | 0.415% | |
| π | 2 | 0.415% | |
| π± | 2 | 0.415% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.415% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 482reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Everyone use my referral link. This is goated https://t.me/Pickpredictwin_bot?start=referral=ppw2kznwyf
π15π9π2π2β€βπ₯1π1π€1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
Hello everyone. My Portuguese friend whose best project is over $22M, the founder of teg bot that went over $1M then .He launched whale prediction bot. It went over 4M. He has launched like 4-6 solid utility projects in 4 years and yes he's a good guy. I'll love you to try the prediction bot. Very safe and good. A giver who does a bot with so many rewards. Use this bot to predict sport, crypto, life around you and aβ¦
β€βπ₯3π2π2π1π€1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
Ronaldo nooooooooooo
π11π10π’3π1π1π«‘1π1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
$ 82.74 [ +10.11% ] π
π10π8π2π³2β‘1β€βπ₯1π€©1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
Some of you are still hodling. It did 2x after my call before it went back to this Hold tight.Donβt jeet on our bags . I updated on private few hours ago. Ansem indeed launched this https://x.com/i/communities/1973000952861905315 https://t.me/whooptydoobyansem which deployed this pumpfun token ca: 6ZamaYZcrkSapB4UcGRLr2aLvwfsexx6Sao9AkNEpump
π9π7β‘2π2β€βπ₯1π1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
2x loading. If you can't ape now because of fear of low cap. Then wait till it's high cap. I'll be posting the CA again soon when it goes higher.
π13π6π€―4β€βπ₯3π3π2π1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
Ansem launched this memecoin proof below; i year ago ansem doxxed one of his main wallets https://x.com/blknoiz06/status/1911113724338790882?s=46&t=jfubefR1ukqdWtYem8QKuQ https://solscan.io/tx/7B2kDp5i9knAg3Z5Sk1B59vKzDpUKuLUKRkia4STBs3cxkyDzMNBqm4BpMJfUD9tuMrLPauLyz9jqaBRu6Fz3Db here his wallet is Dt4gYgAUts6puim6yj4m874V5TuGUGFyZVv4RNpFvUkY this wallet then send out 0.2solana to his side wallet https://solscanβ¦
π12π8β€βπ₯2π2π€2π1π1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
Yo guys,we have a proof that Ansem deployed a coin 1 year ago and Iβll be posting it here. Just watch your entry. I believe itβs the next moon. Ive started sharing in privates. Sorry ,channel friends you gotta wait till the update reaches you. Talking to my team(Being transparent) I know some of you would ask lmao
π9π8β€βπ₯2π2π³1π«‘1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
2 weeks now.Ive pulled off over 3k bots I donβt think I have more than 4k subscribers since 2023. Some handful investors left because of Sabicoin too
π14π9β€βπ₯2π1π€1π«‘1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
Happy Fatherβs Day β€οΈ
π7π5β€βπ₯2π―2π³1π1π1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
Photo, posted without a caption
π12π9π’3π―1π1π€1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
He's the only recognized KING in the space Give KING GK is credit β€οΈ Greatest King of All Time GKOAT
π10π7π2π2π»2β€βπ₯1π³1
Signed KYLE IS BACK&DOXXED㪠@SOLIDX verify @TEGBOTS
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KYLE_REVIEW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 612,737 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βKYLE REVIEWS|SOL|BSC|ETHπ(ALL OF OUR COINS ARE DEAD)β (@KYLE_REVIEW), 4,008 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KYLE_REVIEW.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.